Socialism is good for Asia

thanks to yankbux

지랄마 빨갱이 프록시 새끼야

*That wouldn't be the case without Japan and America.

reminder that japan got half of all of american investments into asia. korea only got like 15% of it

they're gonna have to go back to it whether they want to or not after Trump's done with them

Socialism is not the worst for a country of retards.
Japan will continue to take capitalism.

It's good for eveyone, in all lands.

>using this pic unironically
>not using it to mock China's commitment to socialism
Gucci has no place in a workers state.

Attached: international working womens day socialism rosa luxemburg bourgeois feminism imperialism.jpg (600x529, 110K)

Lmfao, Australia is literally and unironically more socialist than china.

Attached: 1530683288348.gif (352x240, 458K)

Is it though? How would results have been under a more capitalist system with more freedom of choice and movement. China is crumbling under it's shadow banking and municipalities have insane debt levels that are unheard of even in the us.

Attached: 61eb3a326543456b95a0c43995dfb552.jpg (770x1120, 89K)

answer this

Foreign investment is not done by governments but by individuals seeking a more profitable area than their own area of investment. Apparently Japan and Korea had better opportunities for investment and especially more security of revenue. Since China's government is very restrictive on foreign investment and rather invest themselves by increasing credit for municipalities and state banks. Obviously people won't invest in countries where it is more unlikely to realise a revenue or where the government might get in your way of doing business. It's not weird that the more free, open and capitalist economies got more foreign investment than the others, because it's a safer bet while still making profit.

Not really, since investment is done out of self interest and you will be the one with an asset that returns a profit. The other person who gives you the asset in maybe the form of stocks chooses freely to do so and isn't obliged to do so. How is that socialism?

yeah it isn't actually socialism. but when a country is invested in for it to develop its infrastructure and institutions, it seems like socialism at a macro scale

China is actually national socialist

It's only invested in infrastructure because the contractors promise a good return in the investment. The same applies to China but then China just extends credit and gives it to the contractor to make the infrastructure.

What the us government, not individuals, is doing with investment in infrastructure is aiding the economy to grow by helping their infrastructure but in return they want the money back for it with interest obviously, and us businesses to get a special treatment there. It's different from socialism, in China maybe, but they only indebt the population by basically taking money from them from the future to fund the infrastructure projects.

>state capitalism is the means for communism

lol, state capitalism is a tool against starvation, the party have no intent of bringing back that corpse philosophy

>The party have no intent of bringing back that corpse philosophy

Exactly, they still want to remain in absolute power but not in the same way as it was under Mao where everything was determined and planned. They can't afford to it and why would they? Even out of the party's self-interest it would be a stupid thing to do.

Russia is Asia

are you chinese btw

No, I'm half Dutch half Spanish

no it's fucking not
y'all niggers betrayed the revolution
we need communism

Because a system where generally there is no ruling class or people at the top works just fine right? The ideal of communism is completely based on the assumption people will accept it and won't aspire to be in power, which is ridiculous.

dude
there can't be a 1% if everyone's poor as fuck
this is why we need communism

1% is relative. The income inequality is and was worse under hevay socialist and communist countries in the past than in capitalist societies. There are always going to be people at the top no matter what society or country.

Attached: 1528779332985.png (297x198, 87K)

That's just double spanish

1568 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN

>chinese
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>socialism

State owns profitable companies so citizens have to pay less taxes. The main downside is that it stimulates corruption and nepotism.

대한공산죽창화연합회 4계년계획

capitalism is still capitalism even with red flags

Asians could achieve so much thanks to western capitalism. Socialism will only hamper the Asian diligence.