EVERYTHING ON THIS MAP + GREENLAND IS RIGHTFUL NORWEGIAN CLAY

>willingly
Try again, sweetie.

"whoops"

Attached: 1530045917850.jpg (620x456, 102K)

That just says a lot about Norwegian 'power', you know. At least Denmark was an actual power once, whilst your 'empire' wasn't ever anything more than a bunch of pathetic barely inhabited islands of questonable value.

Just admit it baka norway-kun, you didn't want us anymore. At the end you didn't even look at us. Guess islands aren't good enough for the mainland viKANGZ

I glad we didn't become part of Norway. We would all be speaking danish then. In dumb centralised norway.

So says the r*Ssoid, who had to toss tens of millions of bags of meat at the german WW2 war machine to "win" the eastern front.
So says the r*Ssoid, who has quite possibly the worst average living quality in Europe despite being its biggest military power for a long time.
So says the r*Ssoid, who was raped by mongols for centuries until he became a mongol himself.
Be quiet, subhuman scum. Your time in the rope will come soon.
We still want you desu, wasn't there a party in Iceland that wanted to rejoin Norway as our 20th fylke? "Fylkesflokkurinn" or something? It didn't gain any traction, but.

i like both of your countries more than i like norway now
n-not that it matters or anything.

ahem

Attached: scandis.jpg (569x141, 37K)

No, none of us would be speaking bokmål or danish. Bokmål wouldn't even exist and danish would be irrelevant.
We would all be speaking a NORWEGIAN language, akin to nynorsk if you've heard of it but even more "ancient".
But alas, history took another course.

>rebel Danish province thinks it can have rights

>First acquisition of sovereignity: 872
We're older than any other fucking country in the nordics. Denmark wasn't united until the mid 900s under Harald Blåtann.
How do you plead, d*Noid?

And yet we won, funnily enough. Guess throwing bodies works after all?

It's pretty funny that Norway exists today only out of sheer Swedish goodwill. You should be grateful to your betters and not LARP as some kind of great power you never were and never will be.

I plead sovereignity over your ass

Attached: 1530697845962.png (225x225, 11K)

>Hungary
You're irrelevant. Don't waste space in this thread.

I didn't give you permission to reply to me, r*Ssoid.
Your rabid musings are chaos to everyone's ears.

What a shame.

Attached: willy.jpg (2431x3508, 727K)

List of based people:

>danish comebacks: the post

Attached: 1515735730359.jpg (300x300, 10K)

>win back clay in court
there is only one way to win clay

Yeah we don't want to lose our independece to som nerds once again
D-denmark..
>Icelandic and Norwegian will NEVER EVER be mutually intelligible again
Cucked out of your own language by danish BULLS, truly sad

mountaindanes

cuck

everything on this map + greenland & iceland is rightful danish clay

Attached: North Sea Empire.jpg (564x449, 28K)

Based and redpilled
Cringe

>Russian talking shit

Yeah. At least I live in an actual country, not a belgium-tier meme construct. Norway isn't a nation, it is a stray province of Denmark. A geographic designation. You don't even speak 'your' language for the most part, you speak butchered Danish. Ever wondered why Russia never had any designs on Norwegian territories? Cause they're fucking worthless, just like your entire 'people'.

>Cause they're fucking worthless, just like your entire 'people

Said the russian

Cringe and bluepilled

Whatever your implications are, they are wrong because Russia has actual power projection while Norway has none.

Blow me.

>At least I live in an actual country
OH NONONONONO

Your country is a corrupt shithole that has a poor population despite being rich on resources.

>Whatever your implications are, they are wrong

You have the highest HIV rate in Europe and you also have the highest murder rate in Europe. Russians have a bad reputation in our country and probably in many other countries too and not without a reason.

Attached: laughingman-580x358.jpg (580x358, 58K)

So? The quality of life wasn't the original point of the thread.

>norwegian
>clay
Lmao, everything on this map is slovenian clay

Attached: 460px-Mitteleuropa_zur_Zeit_der_Staufer.svg.png (460x599, 300K)

You were the one to claim how you live in an "actual" country.

Fjældabe

Attached: 1477117714138.jpg (438x445, 57K)

And how does any of the above mentioned invalidate that I live in an actual country? Yes, it may be shit for the average citizen, but it is still a relatively self-sufficient nation which is capable of asserting itself in the world.

And Norway, if we return to the OP? Norway is nothing and capable of nothing. It might sure be nice to live in, but it will never ever have any relevance. 'Rightful clay'? Pretty fucking laughable if you ever tried to enforce these claims. You don't have any importance: you only have some pity oil which you use like gulf sandniggers for a cozy life. Besides that, there is nothing, no industry, no science, no innovations. Just a bunch of decadents living in luxury.

The last time Norway was important, you were overran by Germans in weeks, being completely incabaple of putting any meaningful resistance. Just to secure some iron from Swedish mines. Pitiful, isn't it? And we, the Russians and the British, out of pure goodwill expelled the Germans and handed over your country back, asking nothing in return. The average diseased Russian alcoholic working in hellish sweatshops did more for Norwegian independence than Norwegians themselves. That is relevance. Not whatever you are.

>Norway is nothing and capable of nothing.

We migth not be compared to Russia or USA but we are on a smaller scale.

>but it will never ever have any relevance

So? Does that matter as long as we are self sufficient?

>you only have some pity oil which you use like gulf sandniggers for a cozy life. Besides that, there is nothing, no industry, no science, no innovations. Just a bunch of decadents living in luxury.

We have had a few scientists before that migth not have accomplished something very relevant but it is something, we still have industry without the oil.

>being completely incabaple of putting any meaningful resistance

If it wasn't for the heavy water sabotage the nazis could have been able to develop nuclear weapons.

>the Russians and the British, out of pure goodwill expelled the Germans and handed over your country back

Yes, of course the superpowers of the world in WWII had the ability to figth the germans unlike
Norway that was not a superpower.

>The average diseased Russian alcoholic working in hellish sweatshops did more for Norwegian independence than Norwegians themselves

Yeah no.

Correct.

Attached: 1501850120988.jpg (492x368, 149K)

I wish I was born in Norway

Attached: 8sHSszt.jpg (1920x1080, 127K)

>on a smaller scale.
Like what? Norway is perhaps the least powerful European state barring the East. What can it do, a vassal of the EU? It only can be a tension point for Russian-EU conflict (Spitzbergen), and that's it. I'm not sure what are you referring to there.

>we are self sufficient?
You aren't. Your 'independence' is guaranteed by NATO, without it you'd end up like in '40. A nation cannot be considered self-sufficient if it is incapable of defending its sovereignty.

>the nazis could have been able to develop nuclear weapons.
One or two bombs wouldn't mean shit in the face of endless russian hordes. Hitler would probably order to nuke London or Paris though, that'd be hilarious in a sense, but wouldn't change the outcome of war.

>Yes, of course the superpowers of the world in WWII had the ability to figth the germans unlike
Norway that was not a superpower.
So fucking what? You had and have relatively the same population as Finland which successfully resisted aggression by a neigboring superpower. And Norway is even more defensible than Finland. You'd need to draft half your male population to retain independence on your own, but you didn't. You had the means and didn't utilize them, that is pretty shameful.

>Yeah no.
Yeah yes, for the reason stated above. Way more russian military personnel died in Norway than norwegian did. What did you Norwegians do when Germans razed Kirkines? Barely anything. And we liberated it. Big difference.

I don't honestly have anything against Norway, but it is simply annoying when morons like OP pointlessly LARP as if their country is capable of anything when it obviously isn't.

Norway is a bitch country. Willingly ruled by danoids and doesn't want to live with the consequences.

Never forget that Vinland=Newfoundland and Marland=Labrador

>I'm not sure what are you referring to there.

What i mean is that we are capable of figthing smaller countries that don't have a military advantage over us.

>You aren't. Your 'independence' is guaranteed by NATO, without it you'd end up like in '40. A nation cannot be considered self-sufficient if it is incapable of defending its sovereignty.

Ok i stand corrected.

>One or two bombs wouldn't mean shit in the face of endless russian hordes. Hitler would probably order to nuke London or Paris though, that'd be hilarious in a sense, but wouldn't change the outcome of war.

It wouldn't mean shit if Stalingrad, St. Petersburg or Moscow was nuked?

>So fucking what? You had and have relatively the same population as Finland which successfully resisted aggression by a neigboring superpower. And Norway is even more defensible than Finland. You'd need to draft half your male population to retain independence on your own, but you didn't. You had the means and didn't utilize them, that is pretty shameful.

Norway was trying to stay neutral at the start of the war but got invaded by surprise and tried to negotiate with Germany instead of instigating the conflict. At this point the germans had already occupied most of our country, it was too late to draft men into war because germans were already in control.

>What did you Norwegians do when Germans razed Kirkines

As stated above the germans already controlled the country so there is no way we could have stopped them without getting killed most likely.

>I don't honestly have anything against Norway, but it is simply annoying when morons like OP pointlessly LARP as if their country is capable of anything when it obviously isn't.

It was probably intended to be a joke, no one is actually serious about these things as it would be pointless to gain these territories.

>What i mean is that we are capable of figthing smaller countries that don't have a military advantage over us.
I... am not sure what you mean by this. You have no possible conflicts where you could emerge as a victor in all seriousness. It could probably work in the colonial era, but now, with whom would you even fight?

Frankly yes, by the time the bombs would be ready (late 1944-early 1945 at absolutely best) the Germans probably wouldn't even be capable of delivering those bombs; their airforce was decimated at the time and V-type rockets would only be capable of reaching Leningrad which was in absolute misery and as good as nuked anyway.

As per failure to mobilize, yeah I know. That's what I am referring to in fact - I am disgusted by actions of your government which just dug its head in the sand and hoped the war wouldn't come. Finnish attitude was different and respecable at that. After Norway was occupied, the Norwegian government in exile took passive position - once again - hoping others would liberate the country for them. That is the attitude of traitors, and more so was their treatment of the more belligerent Norwegian military leadership like Gen. Fleischer who wanted to actively raid German forces in Norway and raise an army. Doesn't it boggle your mind that they actively shat on the man, driving him in the end to suicide, just because he wanted to actively resist foreign aggression? Christ.

And well, of course there is a chance of being killed if you resist. That's the whole point of resistance. Finnish militiamen, Poles in the underground, Yugoslav partisans knew they were going to almost certainly die - and they still resisted, and died. And they won their country back in the end, with a price. The Norwegian government just sat and waited while others (Britain and Russia) liberated their conuntry and actuvely suppressed domestic efforts to organize resistance. Who does that?

Jokes are meant to be funny, this? Unfunny 'banter'.

>I... am not sure what you mean by this. You have no possible conflicts where you could emerge as a victor in all seriousness.

Yes there is.

>with whom would you even fight?

No one, it's just a scenario.

>by the time the bombs would be ready (late 1944-early 1945 at absolutely best)

Do you have a source on this?

>Gen. Fleischer who wanted to actively raid German forces in Norway and raise an army. Doesn't it boggle your mind that they actively shat on the man, driving him in the end to suicide, just because he wanted to actively resist foreign aggression? Christ.

That is not rigth, but our government was like that for some reason and i understand why you would dislike them for those actions.

>And well, of course there is a chance of being killed if you resist. That's the whole point of resistance. Finnish militiamen, Poles in the underground, Yugoslav partisans knew they were going to almost certainly die - and they still resisted, and died. And they won their country back in the end, with a price. The Norwegian government just sat and waited while others (Britain and Russia) liberated their conuntry and actuvely suppressed domestic efforts to organize resistance. Who does that?

The resistance would be pointless because the germans who were already in control would most likely detect any sizeable resistance army and sent half the male population to concentration camps, then what?

>Do you have a source on this?
Nah, just speculation. But consider how much resources spent the Americans on the Manhattan Project (more than the Germans did), how many scientists they lost (to the Americans), and the state of their collapsing industry which started to crack by late 1942. They couldn't mass produce nuclear bomb, much less deliver them.

>then what
Then it draws German attention away, forces them to employ more suppression measures, and generally wears them down. Yugoslav and Soviet partisans were a huge pain in the German ass and probably were one of the deciding factors in the war. Now consider the scenario where Norway manages to properly mobilize and resist German aggression in time. Say, Oslo is lost and the frontline is estabilished, with 100-150 thousand men on Norwegian side. That alone erases Narvik port from the picture, and thus Swedish iron imports in the winter. You also have to consider that Germans occupied Norway without land connection - meaning they had to use ferries from Jutland to Oslo - and be constantly at huge risk of being intercepted by the British Navy. In that situation, if there was a frontline in Norway, it would end in utter disaster for Germany, which would lose hundreds of thousands of troops, which could be used elsewhere (as they historically were).

>Now consider the scenario where Norway manages to properly mobilize and resist German aggression in time. Say, Oslo is lost and the frontline is estabilished, with 100-150 thousand men on Norwegian side. That alone erases Narvik port from the picture, and thus Swedish iron imports in the winter. You also have to consider that Germans occupied Norway without land connection - meaning they had to use ferries from Jutland to Oslo - and be constantly at huge risk of being intercepted by the British Navy. In that situation, if there was a frontline in Norway, it would end in utter disaster for Germany, which would lose hundreds of thousands of troops, which could be used elsewhere (as they historically were).

That is what we should have done but there was too much pointless negotiation and not enough resistance and we acted too late. But forming any resistance after the germans occupied us would still be pointless since then the we would lose most of our troops for almost nothing, that was my main point.

Well, perhaps. Thanks for the talk anyway, it was fine, but carried away for a while. Wasting time in a shitpost thread.

based and redpilled

ITT: Danes take the highroad yet again while dealing with their endlessly bitchy babby neighbors from Iceland-Finland

Attached: Toddlers.jpg (1280x853, 188K)

Yes, i should have used the time to do something else but i get very engaged sometimes.

If you did not want to be dominated by your neighbors, why did you choose to be such meek pushovers?

>Taking advantage of a nation that lost 50% of it's population to plague and bragging about it
How very impressive, truly shows swedish strength and morals