Always was

>a running chicken

Serbs won Eurobasket for them.

can you classify this guy?

Attached: 1531325808961.png (1440x2560, 2.93M)

imagine being called SLAVEnia, having slavic flag, speaking south slaveic language and claiming that you are german xaxaxaxax

she looks extremely russian

no, she doesn't

at least not extremely

Okay, this is danubo-germanic

Attached: eszter balla.jpg (1054x752, 124K)

they are not that similar

A whole bunch of med and pontid stuff i'd say

You should ask that agrippa guy he's a pioneer of internet anthropology and one of the best at classifying ppl at a single glance

don't you see some finnic in him?
i'm too lazy to register on forums, i'll just ask on pol

Attached: 1531326728453.jpg (2592x1944, 1.32M)

I cannot decide whether the morph looks more similar to that magyar martyr woman or that other random slovenian actress

In any case i should prolly strive to finish the recreation of the original phenotype mixer soonish (which is difficult because i never got to see the original one and all of its features before the site went down thanks to antifa race denialists)

Attached: hmm.jpg (874x412, 65K)

You mean ostbaltid/lappid? Nah not really

Wouldn't be surprised if he has some north african markers though with those baboon looking upper lips

Did you goys know that magyar and sumerian are extremely similar? Also the scythians can trace their origins to proto-indo-germanics

Attached: original research do not steal.jpg (2392x1670, 1.07M)

I actually pity Slovenes, probably the most underrated and unfairly treated nation in the world just because they decided to unite in one country with Balkanites for some strange reason and now they're considered "Eastern Europe", "Second world", "Ex-communist country", "Balkan country" and everything everyone associates with poverty, drug smuggling, human trafficking, HIV, wars, ugly cities, commieblocks, bad weather and horrible cuisine, even though Slovenia looks totally western, its infrastructure is far ahead of many actual "first world" countries and their living standards and wages are pretty decent, even by western standards.

i thought because he has rare facial hair, and that skin around his eyes looks like it's a trace of epicanthic folds.

and he has a neanderthal chin

hungarians are mostly celtic imo.

How are they compared to Slovakia and Czechia? I always thought they would be similar to Slovenia.

Not at all, Czechia and Slovakia are typical commie countries. Czechia is slightly better off in terms of salaries than other countries but infrastructure-wise it's not even half that good like Slovenia. Also architecture-wise, most of Slovenes live in Austria-tier nice houses in beautiful suburbs, while Czechs live either in commieblocks or in cube commie-houses like pic related (Poland is also full of them). And Czechs make way less money than Slovenes, believe me, 1000 eur/month is already decent money in Czechia (inb4 Prague chimping out - we're talking about average), while in Slovenia it's rather poor wage. Not to mention, that Czechia has reached a decent living standard just recently, while in almost the whole period ~1960-2010 Slovenia was much, much wealthier and you can see it, especially in architecture and infrastructure.

Attached: screenshot-www.google.pl-2018.07.12-17-44-22.jpg (1599x776, 281K)

btw you yugos probably don't even realize how good you had it in Yugoslavia, comparing to other commie countries, it was a different, better world for us, you can even see it in commieblocks, these buildings in most of commie countries were just grey monstrosities made of panels of bad quality, meanwhile in Yugoslavia, especially in Slovenia and Croatia, they were usually relatively low and more like Italian blocks, they don't look bad at all.

Attached: screenshot-www.google.pl-2018.07.12-17-49-49.jpg (1591x779, 337K)

I thought the proximity to Austria would make them somewhat equal but yea I am aware of the whole yugo thing I mean my parents still think most west slavs are poorer than Croatia. Talk about living in the past huh.

Illyrian/Dalmatian

Informisi me kad saznas vise

>still think most west slavs are poorer than Croatia.

Because it's true. Well, maybe now an average Czech or even Pole makes more money per month than an average Croat or it's easier to find a job for us, but you have accumulated so much wealth for the "fat" period of Yugoslavia that we'll need a lot of time to catch up with you. I mean, you have wonderful roads, highways all around the country, the vast majority of Croats live in big houses, commieblocks are rather rare and still of much better quality than here, you have quite big, domestic industry (especially that you're only a 4 million nation) and I don't even count your tourism industry because it's just your location (but still, you can use it and earn money from it, unlike some Albania). And it's all despite a disastrous war, migrations, genocides just 25 years ago. Impressive as fuck, but it proves how much Yugoslavia was ahead of other commie countries.

>I thought the proximity to Austria would make them somewhat equal

Not at all, the border in the commie era was closed and Czechs had to take examples from Moscow more than from any western country. The most striking example is the fate of the town of Most, a cute medieval old town that was simply blown up in a Soviet way just to make way for a coal mine and a typical ugly grey commieblock settlement was built just nearby:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_(Most_District)

Would Tito blow up Dubrovnik to build a shipyard? No, that's the difference.

whatever you say, radu

Homo Boomerus Ordinarius

NO

youtube.com/watch?v=QCtwfclTFI8

What's the comment saying?

youtube.com/watch?v=r_ZgxYgjkgU

>for some strange reason
Because it's extremely irrelevant.

>Slovenia
>Dalmatian
Dude, what are you doing?

That Rijeka is 88/14 ancient Croatian clay and Shitalians never had anything to do with it.

>I mean, you have wonderful roads
I'm pretty sure all the nice roads and highways were built after the yugo and thats probably one of the main reasons why croatia is in a huge
debt.

Don't think the little we got from Yugoslavia will last, your countries are growing and we're still living in the 90's.

>Because it's extremely irrelevant.

They could have joined Austria or Italy instead.

>Unironically the only istrian city that was used to have strong venetian minority (until 1954) unlike many other istriot cities

Polish education

>I'm pretty sure all the nice roads and highways were built after the yugo

Well, the highway Zagreb-Belgrade is from Yugoslavia afaik. But even if most of them are from the 1990s, you needed to have money for it, in other eastern European countries in the 1990s almost no highways were built, while you did it just after the war.

>croatia is in a huge
debt.

Who in Eastern Europe isn't?

>Don't think the little we got from Yugoslavia will last, your countries are growing and we're still living in the 90's.

Well, but even if we grow with the pace we do now, we'll need many, many years to catch up with Croatia, not even to surpass it.

>minority
* Mayority not minority

Did you really expect a Croatian tv show to emphasize how Italian the city was throughout centuries?

Why not? What's the problem?

It's not a matter of ''muh clay'' or ''muh annexation'', but of historical fact.

ALL of us admit the strong balkanic influence in Trieste / Trst and in the whole Friuli (and the Venetian Giulia region, now reduced only to Triese because the Fiume / Rijeka, Veglia / Krk and Pola provinves are ALL in former jugo states).

for the same reason why Italian TV doesn't show historical facts how Italians genocided Slavs, Albanians or other nations but goes full "muh we weren't fascist it's just that Hitler brah"

this is the problem I have with croats, there exists nothing but croats when it comes to their history.
anything to do with bosnia is always more "croat" than it is not
ie serbian knights are called "bosnian orthodox" or even "croatian" just because there's this belief that bosnia is most definitly croatian land
how any connection with the serbs is diminished (ie serbs in the military border get replaced with vlachs), it's never hungary always hungary-croatia, it's always how much cities and people are croatian than not etc

Tvrtko was a Croat king tho

he was more Bosnian than Croat or Serb.
but look up kosača family. They were orthodox serbs but somehow they're croatian

don't worry you don't have to teach me on my nation's history

nikad nećeš biti hrvat

>how Italians genocided Slavs
They constantly brainwash us about ''muh guilt''.

BTW, it was only after the '20s since before that time eastern regions were still austrians.

During venetian times slavs and venetians (not ''italians'') and furlans and other minorities as the istrorumenians lived all close and in peace.

Even modern chakavian croat is heavy venetized.

Albanians were never genocided, they even joined our Birgate Nere during fascism and during our Civil War (1943-1945).

Based germanic brother :)

Attached: 1531332357224.jpg (800x705, 195K)

nemoj tako

>they constantly brainwash us about muh guilt
>but we never killed anyone, we're good guys, we only prepared pizza for Wehrmacht

No.

We did horrible things in Istria Dalmatian and Africa.

But we tried to assimilate slavs only after the 20s because before we weren't even in these lands as modern states, they were under Asburgic rule.

Venetians and slavs lived together in these lands for centuries before ''Italy'' as a shitty state was even conceived.

The Most Serene Venetian Republic was a multicult and multinational states.

I've (as a venetian) a slav sounding surname too, probabily from some istriot ancestors.

Rijeka isn't even in Istria, you retard. And Venetians got it by conquest.

>And Venetians got it by conquest.
Just as you.

We were both idiots because we genocided each others while for centuries we lived together in that area.

I know isn't genographical Istria, it's Carnaro (i don't know croat name, Kvarner?). But here it's strongly associated with Istria.

>Venetians and slavs lived together in these lands for centuries
>The Most Serene Venetian Republic was a multicult
>while for centuries we lived together
I'm okay with this, but this board is loaded with Italian irredentitist who negate the Slavic aspect of Dalmatian history, so I get triggered too easily. I actually like you guys.

ALL the furlans and venetians know the multicult aspect of our former Republic, we even had slavic admirals nobles and generals.

I've a slavic (i think) surname too from my istrian side of the family (Kocijan, idk if is actually slavic or not).

Irredentists are a bunch of fascist fags who stil fapp themselves over D'Annunzio pcitures and cry lisening Mussolini speechs, don't give them attentions.

Like i said you're better off asking the pros, i only do this as a hobby on the side and only got into it thanks to my genealogical musings

There's maybe a celto-germanic component but their phenotype is overall something quite different from other purely celtic peoples. Austrians, northern croats, slovenians and hungarians basically all form one big racial cluster.

What also interests me is how the sudetic sub-race fits into all of this... Traditionally sudetes were counted as an austro-germanic subgroup. I also get marker hits with czechs *and* hungarians in my autosomal data despite having no recent ancestor from either hungary or czechia to my knowlegde. Just goes to show how close these genetic connections really are imo

Attached: 041f57e78ebad62acaa752a071637577.jpg (236x354, 24K)

I second this. When talking of Slovenia in France, I get answers from
>"Where the fuck is it ?"
to
>"Why do you want to go in Slovakia ?"
or
>"Enjoy our commie block capital city"

Meanwhile, I am sipping šipon along the Ljubljanica or doing some hiking in Šmarna Gora.

there are probably more commieblocks in Paris than in all of Slovenia

I think this comes as a package together with the fact that although having a very long history, your country has been existing as a whole only for a century and a half.
Every occasion was good to try to crystallize anybody around anything at that time.

Well, you can try to compare an "ethnically diverse" country with 65M inhabitants and a decolonization period with an "ethnically uniform" (some may disagree, but I disgress) country with 2M inhabitants and a totally different recent history.

But sure, there are more dirty suburbs in Marseille than in whole Slovenia.
I don't want to say that life in your usual commie block, like in, say, Trbovlje, is totally a bed of roses...
But listening to rap like Slon in Sadež, I find it quite funny compared to french rap.

youtube.com/watch?v=bUZvFuaYQI4

''Italy'' as a concept is relative new despite the claims, even the language is so artificial that spreaded only after the '40s.

Piemonteis were for centuries under Savoye and were used to speak basically a languedoc dialect, lombards were divided, venetians and furlans ruled a marine state that lasted 1100 years, tuscans were independent and creative, centrals were under the Pope for 1500 years, neapolitans ruled the south, etc.

As I was in Bellino, I heard all chaps speaking a variety of occitan. I found that I had less trouble understanding that (I am from southern france) than their variety of italian.

>I don't want to say that life in your usual commie block, like in, say, Trbovlje, is totally a bed of roses...

but how many commieblocks are there? five? how many people live there? 5% of the town's population?

Try turinèis valadois:

youtube.com/watch?v=9UA4XNZrr9c

youtube.com/watch?v=uPcUVvVAtq0

Totally looks alike.
youtube.com/watch?v=OdroBng6Vvc

It's provençau the piemontèis occitan, i don't believe it's vivaroaupenc at all.

Not surpsing at all:

fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duché_de_Savoie