Who would win in a war?
Who would win in a war?
Other urls found in this thread:
web.archive.org
en.wikipedia.org
nationalinterest.org
foreignaffairs.com
twitter.com
Russia
USA. More nukes, more forces. less gay.
50% of american army is private
Europeans just need to pay more to the mercenaries of the Black Water
England.
The US has troops in Europe.
RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN
Russia
The rest of the world, specially of shartmerica gets nuked
>Who would win in a war?
the jews
they're the only ones who win when humans kill each other
Xaxaxaxaxaxa...
The US in 3 weeks.
Nothing would happen. The USA can't conquer Europe. Europe can't conquer the USA.
You realize that the EU depends on the USA for protection?
Lmfao, if the US disables its Aegis system the EU is fucked. The only thing preventing the EU from being steamrolled by Russia is the burgers Europeans like to make fun of.
Literally biting the hand that feeds them (in this case, protects).
USA, because which European country would fight the USA anyway?
The US because it would be extremely easy to D&C a bloc of 28 vastly different nations. Neither side would be able to conquer or hold territory from the other though, so it may as well just be a stalemate.
Dutch ships can even target satellites and missiles from space.
>The USA can't conquer Europe
What a fucking retarded and baseless assumption. The USA not only has the manpower but also much more advanced military technology to buttrape the EU if they wanted to. Europe is a vassal of the US whether you like it or not
>inb4 calls me a burger on a proxy
just stating facts.
I don't like the USA but it's the truth.
The USA literally hasn't enough troops to occupy such a vast area with 510 million people living in it. How on earth are you going to occupy Europe?
Even against civilians their soldiers are outnumbered 1000 to 1. And as they train soldiers we also train soldiers.
The USA has literally the greatest projection power in the fucking world.
China doesn't even come close to it, what the fuck do you think Europe would be able to do in a war against the USA?
The U.S. defense budget is $609 billion.
Burger on proxy
What?
Why do you assume you need to occupy every single territory in order to maintain control of it?
That's a ridiculous premise.
Europe has enough submarines to sink their entire fleet. Getting troops across the ocean is a problem by itself.
The same goes for American submarines. It would literally be impossible to land on each others shores.
Europe also has troops in europe you dumb fucking retard
eu is almost toothless
answer is usa, for now
another question why would they attack europe
He said Europe would be fucked if they shut down the Aegis system.
But we have the best radars in the world. We also export them to the French and British navy.
Anti missiles/ICBM systems are a meme. They never work.
>As of February 3, 2017, Aegis BMDS has performed 34 successful intercepts in 41 at-sea attempts.[45]
web.archive.org
You were saying???
Our ships can also detect stealth.
In practice our ships are used to ping target for the American navy so they can shoot them down. Basically extending their range. We save money as we can keep our missiles, and they get extra range.
jews probably
why do they always win lad
The USA obviously. But this is a dumb question because the EU is not a country, if you take France, we are allies with the USA, so there will never have a war between us.
bump
>WW3 against Russia inevitably happens
>tens of millions of white men dead again
>the world grows exponentially darker literally and metaphorically
Never say never
>such a vast area
Your whole continent isn't much bigger than Indonesia.
>Russia
This. The US could just pull out assets, and win.
yfw the netherlands are the secret superpower
*fucks your americans shit up*
nothing personel kid
It must be their superior internet that skyrocketed them into such power.
>WW3 against Russia inevitably happens
>tens of millions of white men dead again
>rest of them migrate as refugees to the darker countries
>refugees welcome(?)
>darker countries become WHITED
>war games
>an entire carrier task force vs one small diesel submarine
yeah lucky it is war games
>yeah lucky it is war games
Thanks for the intel goy.
I've seen this brought up a lot. Is this war game really the only proud moment in Sweden's history?
US without question
Is this a rhetorical question? Of course the US lol
en.wikipedia.org
They had the Thirty Year's War until Poltava
Nothing, because a massive international reshuffling like 'the US and Europe go to war' would almost certainly shatter the European Union as the different constituent countries begin looking out for their own interests.
I'm surprised most people, even Europeans said the US.
>more forces
Wrong
>US lost to US
About right.
Obviously the US. America has put more money into it's military than the rest of the country for decades
Who was the fucking retard that designed that image? The misinformation in it is amazing.
Both sides would lose.
>Our ships can also detect stealth
Any radar can detect stealth, you silly clod. The point is that you will need to get closer to detect it when compared to a non-stealth craft. If the opponent has stealth and you don't, they have a definite advantage to launch their missile salvo and change their vector. You're pushed immediately on the defensive.
Who would win if Finland commands Europe's forces?
US would "win", but they could never hope to secure EU countries.
Why not?
Didn't the same happen with a French submarine in another wargame?
The US has neither the manpower nor the forces necessary to do so. We're not a land power - we're a naval and air power. Which is why our involvement in European wars consists almost entirely of amphibious and aerial assaults.
nationalinterest.org
Here it is. How come Americans get btfo by subs?
Because subs are designed to be hard to detect, and the whole wargame situation is basically a worst case scenario for USN, but still worth it to practice.
In a real situation, it would be very unlikely for a sub to sink a carrier.
>Thirty Year's War until Poltava
Wrong war, dude.
we've already done it twice.
the third world.
Because our traditional foes (the Germans, the Russians, the Chinese) all specialize in sub warfare, so we keep our anti-sub countermeasures classified and out of the wargames.
>Europe has enough submarines to sink their entire fleet
>people think subs matter in 2018 for anything other than being a moving nuclear silo
It's 2018 and nobody still has a space force.
literally no one does. that's why you have screens and helicopters. plus must people are out in the ocean on passive sonar only because of the whales and dolphins. once war is all out, you'd have everyone and their mom using active sonar.
in honesty, that's the real goal for anyone serious about being number one in military. anything else is dickwavy, muh jobs, bullshit. literally most of our military is basically all about muh jobs.
>literally no one does. that's why you have screens and helicopters. plus must people are out in the ocean on passive sonar only because of the whales and dolphins. once war is all out, you'd have everyone and their mom using active sonar.
You're forgetting the difference in speed. Carriers go 40+kn while diesel-electrics on AIP go barely 10. If they turn on engines while submerged, they'll generate more noise and be more visible to sonar. And even at max speed, they aren't catching a CSG.
Frankly, Trump is going to be president of the EU as well.
Better than Juncker.
Russia should just glass both so you can stop asking stupid questions
Try conquering Detroit back from the chimps or LA back from the spics and then talk, you haven't won anything in forever in home or abroad lmao
Proxy
Yes. Then hand in hand Putin and Trump will unite in a common cause, leading long awaited right wing death squads to victory to establish many post-scarce ethnostates and global white superiority. This will effectively cure humankind of parasitic, lesser, races, and allow the rest of us to focus on a peaceful, technologically advanced future, and do all sorts of amazing science and art shit and live long, happy, rich, important and meaningful lives.
I think Trump and Putin will be remembered for longer in more households even better than any north korean will ever be able to admire any Kim nigger.
The rest of the world.
european readiness is a fraction of what it's supposed to be. The US fleets are built to take on submarines, 50 some-odd dated diesel submarines (half in dry dock) aren't going to do anything. The war would be over in a month. Then europe would be BLACKED once again.
foreignaffairs.com
EU
>americans trying to discuss European history
Russia
lol