Imo a real human language cannot have more or less than two verb tenses.
Something either happened, happens atm or will happen in the future.
Do you agree?
Imo a real human language cannot have more or less than two verb tenses
>three verb tenses.
What a fail
Real human languages don't give genders to inanimate objects.
VERY based and MEGA redpilled
på tal om riktiga språk
And on that note, russian is shit tier ooga booga language which should take notes from bulgarian.
>he doesn't have genderless as a third gender in his language
lmao
This
>>genderless
The absolute state of us.
I walked.
I have been walking.
I am walking.
I am going to walk.
I will be walking.
slavshits on suicide watch
and in New York, I'm walking here!
And "I will have walked"
>I will have walked
I don't think that's correct.
>tenselets
seems fine to me, e.g. "i will have walked home by then" could be an example
I think you could use it if telling someone during the present that you're going to walk - I will have walked 5 miles by the time you finish
true
where's present perfect/future perfect?
oh right yeah that makes sense now that it's given a proper context
silly me