Imo a real human language cannot have more or less than two verb tenses

Imo a real human language cannot have more or less than two verb tenses.
Something either happened, happens atm or will happen in the future.
Do you agree?

Attached: simple_verb_tenses.png (539x325, 33K)

>three verb tenses.
What a fail

Real human languages don't give genders to inanimate objects.

VERY based and MEGA redpilled

på tal om riktiga språk

And on that note, russian is shit tier ooga booga language which should take notes from bulgarian.

Attached: 1531679965361.png (1988x1204, 231K)

Attached: 1004152.jpg (640x480, 37K)

>he doesn't have genderless as a third gender in his language
lmao

This

>>genderless
The absolute state of us.

I walked.
I have been walking.
I am walking.
I am going to walk.
I will be walking.

slavshits on suicide watch

and in New York, I'm walking here!

And "I will have walked"

>I will have walked
I don't think that's correct.

>tenselets

Attached: l.png (640x480, 24K)

seems fine to me, e.g. "i will have walked home by then" could be an example

I think you could use it if telling someone during the present that you're going to walk - I will have walked 5 miles by the time you finish

true

where's present perfect/future perfect?

oh right yeah that makes sense now that it's given a proper context
silly me