Assange will likely be handed over to the UK within the coming weeks. What does Jow Forums think about this?

they had material on Republicans and decided not to release it
they had apolitical material and decided not to release it
they timed releases to do the most damage to the Clinton campaign, rather than as it came in/was vetted

They stopped being an advocate for transparent government and become something more vindictive and seemed to be holding a personal grudge against her. And I hated Hillary

Can't wait to see this fag executed.
A fucking communist pig deserves death

>of all countries he can flee to, flees to russia
nah bro hes not a spy

He went full alt-right in 2016. At this point he's basically a Trump propagandist with actual documents.

Attached: flynn was charged for lying to law enforcement and doing the bidding of a foreign power.png (593x297, 70K)

So what are the charges against him? Apart from that rape bullshit of course.

Attached: suggs43.png (419x393, 144K)

Thank you for Correcting The Record. Lol
They release everything they have. The timing was against Hillary only because she was corrupr and the evidence was there. It would be dishonest of him NOT to realease it. Besides he's by far not the only one working on wikileaks.
>flees to russia
What the fuck are you on about? That's Snowden dumbass
Nah. Hw took jabs at Trump amd republicans too repeatedly. Somehow you brainlets and the media seem to ignore that

i always get those 2 confused haha whoops

Is it even Assange who is typing ?

>"the DNC leaks came from a source that has no relations to Russia"
>turns out that wasn't true
>"o shid :DDD"

unlikely not
he (usually) has other people do stuff on the wikileaks account

Can't wait desu

I didn't say he shouldn't release it. I said they timed it to do the most damage rather than when it came in and was vetted. They are dishonest.

For example releasing a bunch of hacked emails the night before the DNC convention. Or releasing more hacked emails (which they'd had for awhile) the day the "grab them by the pussy" tape comes out. Pretty clear they were working either with or with the same goals as Russia.

This mong is one of the biggest living frauds on the planet.

>I said they timed it to do the most damage rather than when it came in and was vetted.
No they didnt. And it really doesnt matter. If she fucked up then people deserve to know. Obviously they'd want the truth to go as public as possible.
Your russia paranoia shouldnt factor into it

>reveal state secrets
>expect them not to fuck with you

If he did the same to russia he would have had more than his lethal dose of plutonium by now, public figure or not.

Great news. Hope he goes to Guantanamo.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Allegations_of_Russian_influence

>Hope he goes to Guantanamo.
wait, you *Nglos don't have a version of Gitmo?

>Obviously they'd want the truth to go as public as possible.
Ding ding ding. They delayed the release of things to do the most damage, rather than releasing them immediately. Like I said, they are dishonest.

They actively collaborated with and Assange himself worked for RT, which Russia uses for propaganda.
They turned down a bunch of documents which would have been damaging to the Russian government.

Serves him right, I hope he gets killed.

THIS JUST IN: Julian Assange found to have committed suicide. Apparently he shot himself in the back of the head 3 times, stuffed himself into a duffel bag and threw himself into the Thames. More information as it comes in...

They’re basically the same desu.

>They delayed the release of things to do the most damage
Clearly they're in league with the Russians then
>they are dishonest
HOW is that dishonest lol? They were rightfullu hurting the reputation of a dishonest shrew running for the highest office. It would be dumb and pointless if they didnt do that.
>They turned down a bunch of documents which would have been damaging to the Russian government.
No they didnt actually. They've realeased fuck loads of documents damaging to Russian officials including the panama papers. You're full of shit
>he dis an interview for RT when no other channel would have him for exposing the truth
>he is therefore a Russian propagandist
Kek. Keep shilling

Both heroes

*betas

Good

Hope they give him to us and we give him the needle

foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-leaks-on-russian-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/

>No they didnt actually.
See:

YEAH ARREST IT

also
>Kek. Keep shilling
Oh the irony. Turn off your proxy, Ivan.

>steals government documents
>oi y u want him arrested?

Fuck off

People like this do nothing but negative shit

Wikileaks had nothing to do with the Panama papers

Guy went out of his way to fuck up our elections so hopefully he gets at least 15 years.

This. Assange even criticised the release of the Panama Papers.

>In April 2016, WikiLeaks tweeted criticism of the Panama Papers, which had among other things revealed Russian businesses and individuals linked with offshore ties (Vladimir Putin's associates had as much as $2 billion in offshore accounts).[284][268] The WikiLeaks Twitter account tweeted, "#PanamaPapers Putin attack was produced by OCCRP which targets Russia & former USSR and was funded by USAID and [George] Soros".[23] Putin would later go on to dismiss the Panama Papers by citing WikiLeaks: "WikiLeaks has showed us that official people and official organs of the U.S. are behind this.”[23] According to The New York Times, both Assange claims are substance-free: "there is no evidence suggesting that the United States government had a role in releasing the Panama Papers."[285] Assange also falsely asserted that the Panama Papers gave Western figures a free pass, when the leaks in fact reported on a number of high-profile Western politicians, including UK Prime Minister David Cameron.[268]

He's so clearly a Russian asset, along with the entire WikiLeaks organisation.

>Putin also said: "WikiLeaks has showed us that official people and official organs of the US are behind this."[228]

Lol
>but muh wikileaks isn't pro-Russian
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers

I love Snowden and I used to like Assange until he turned into a weird kremlin agent.

>according to partial chat logs reviewed by Foreign Policy.
LMAO
>betas
>risking their whole life for the pursuit of truth
No u
>Wikileaks had nothing to do with the Panama papers
Ok. Even so
techcrunch.com/2017/09/19/wikileaks-releases-documents-it-claims-detail-russia-mass-surveillance-apparatus/?guccounter=1
medium.com/@caityjohnstone/wikileaks-has-published-leaks-on-trump-admin-and-russia-and-is-seeking-more-e36d53151394

>Clearly they're in league with the Russians then
Read the whole post, don't just pick apart each sentence as if it's separate, Vlad.
>HOW is that dishonest lol? They were rightfullu hurting the reputation of a dishonest shrew running for the highest office. It would be dumb and pointless if they didnt do that.
A real media organization releases it as it's vetted. It doesn't hold onto it for months so it can do the most damage to its target.
>No they didnt actually. They've realeased fuck loads of documents damaging to Russian officials including the panama papers. You're full of shit
Wikileaks had nothing to do with Panama Papers other than criticizing its release, lying about it being Anti-Russian, and insinuating it was a George Soros false flag. It was reported on initially by a German newspaper and then fully released by the ICIJ, an American group. Nice try, though.

foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-leaks-on-russian-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/

>>he dis an interview for RT when no other channel would have him for exposing the truth
>an interview
They literally gave him a show.

The Germans, British, French, and Americans have all concluded they've been infiltrated by Russia and used as a front to launder documents stolen by Russian hackers. Their agenda can't be trusted.

>snowden isn't a kremlin agent
>he literraly takes residence in Moscow and constantly espouses pro-Russian anti-US government material

Are you, by chance, retarded?

assange did nothing wrong

The Russian surveillance documents were already public

he shouldn't have been a spy for Russia

>I was with him until they decided to release items that damages the person I was rooting for politically because truth is less important to be than ideology, and the russia narative

>A real media organization releases it as it's vetted.
Where is the evidence to the contrary?

wrong
Snowden is bae and helps others learn about security
Assange is out for himself while being locked in a closet

Attached: snowdenisbae.jpg (576x694, 211K)

thats snowden you nigger

This

>a
>fucking
>sharepoint
>admin

funny how you are literally describing wikileaks only releasing documents that damaged hillary clinton

Your entire political system is entirely fucked already.

I didn't want Hillary to win. Nice strawmanning, though.

Lenin Moreno is such an hypocrite

>how DARE he tell us the truth

Organization 1 is here Wikileaks
>In the summer of 2016, according to the D.O.J., “Organization 1” wrote to Guccifer 2.0, asking it to “[s]end any new material [stolen from the DNC] here for us to review and it will . . . have a much higher impact than what you are doing.” Then they added: “if you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo [sic] days prefable [sic] because the DNC [Democratic National Convention] is approaching and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.” Guccifer 2.0 responded: “ok . . . i see.”

Pic related also. Message between Donnie jr. and wikileaks. You've been played like fools.

Attached: DOjVGt2WAAAglXR[1].jpg (927x1200, 79K)

>democrat “leaks”
>supporting a specific candidate from within their own party like political parties always fucking have
>republican leaks
>conspiring to make the country a vestige of Russia and protecting literal child molesters and money launderers

but arr rook same amirite

Snowden warned about mass surveillance who kept being larger and larger and who could not prevent crimes from happening but who could be used to prosecute you.

I'm honestly not a fan that every phone call, every shit I'm writing in private is processed by a foreign governement, maybe now several, it makes some people crazy to think there are being taped or listen too H24.

Assange is an idealist who was manipulated by foreigns governements, his transparency policy is exactly what I feared. The guy released everything whitout blanking names and adresses.

if they had anything on trump the should have released it, but the still they did great work by leaking what they had on hillary, the only way did anywrong doing is if they lied and passed something false as fact

Why the fuck should I have a problem with him only releasing documents about western countries?
Corruption is the biggest bane of countries, far more than any ideology, and whistleblowers help fighting that.
I don't care at all if russian officials are avoided.

>24508▶
>democrat “leaks”
>supporting a specific candidate from within their own party like political parties always fucking have
if its such a nonissue why are you butthurt by people knowing about it?

I’m not. I’m more disturbed that people think it’s something to actually get worked up about in the first place.

Glenn Greenwald is also a piece of shit.

this

i don't think if they were aiming to get one person elected over the other, but i still thing people deserved to know that the dnc was rigged for hillary

Please don't forget the part where he was forced to get help from russia because banks worldwide decided, out of any legal realm, that they refused money transferts to wikileak.
The system doing all it can to kill its whistleblowers is far more dangerous than a russian support.

>Message between Donnie jr. and wikileaks.
Kek you idiot. That's literally wikileaks trying to persuade Trump Jr to finally release their tax returns. Assange was the one to disclose than conversation

Is there a meme in this?
No meme no care.

Based and redpilled. This guy became a literal tool.

>B-but muhh Russia
They fell for the political punditry.

Wikileaks or the Russians?
If you looked at wikileaks twitter feed leading up to the election it was pretty clear what side they were on.

As long as they don't hand him over to the US it doesn't matter.

wikileaks

And there's a good reason for it.
Hillary is corrupt as fuck

>Americans voters are babies and I must prevent them from voting wrongly

What incredible arrogance.

based zoomer

I mean, yes that's what it says in the message. Did you not read why they wanted that? Completely missing the point.
And Assange didn't release that conversations, it was Donnie Jr.

>the dnc was rigged for hillary

How, exactly? People voted in the primaries and that was it. Nobody forged the vote in her favor, they just took out more ad space for her (which is pretty useless in the digital age).

Just out of interest, can you name what is so corrupt about her?

>UK not doing what US tells them to do.

Your hopes are.. unreal.

>Did you not read why they wanted that?
What's wrong with it. They were trying to convince him that it would be in his interest to release the truth

The very reason the leaks had such an effect for one. The DNC rigged the candidacy in he favour. Also the Uranium deal, her behaviour during the Clinton affair and last but not least the murder of Seth Rich (who really leaked the DNC documents)

>muh uranium one
>muh emails
>muh Seth rich
screaming
STATE of this Ivan

I figured.

You forgot about pizzagate.

Attached: tenor[1].gif (220x167, 157K)

Messing with the voting times/dates, closed primaries, colluding with the media to control mainstream narrative etc etc. You should know about this shit better, it's your own country.

there's also the time Assange/wikileaks got caught talking to Roger Stone, who's a long time Trump ally.
frankly I'm against the mass hysteria regarding Russia.
but only a retard wouldn't find this shady.

>YEAH!

>i-it doesnt matter
Try making an argument next time

Gonna need a source on all of that, friend.

Nothing shady about it

>the murder of Seth Rich (who really leaked the DNC documents)
but he didn't

investigaterussia.org/timelines/everything-we-know-about-russia-and-president-trump

If you read this, it goes way deeper.

>thread about wikileaks exposing hillarys corruption
>cant come up with a thing from her emails that showed her corruption
What a waste of time.

Lets not forget about that time they tried to cover up the email server scandal (where she tried to hide evidence)
>HOW DO YOU WIPE A DRIVE LMAO?
bostonherald.com/opinion/op_ed/2018/07/bill_clinton_dishes_out_fiction_on_loretta_lynch_meeting