60% percent of Mexicans are Amerindian and the remaining 40% are Indo-mestizos that have 65-75% indigenous blood...

60% percent of Mexicans are Amerindian and the remaining 40% are Indo-mestizos that have 65-75% indigenous blood. Is it safe to say that Mexico is a modern Amerindian ethnostate?

Attached: 2000px-Flag_of_Mexico.svg.png (2000x1143, 190K)

Attached: 1532141406028.png (796x859, 365K)

yes

Yes. It's why Mexico is shit.

but we're too influenced by western consumerism & cultural imperialism (Mostly Murrilard)

I'd say Bolivia is more akin to an "Amerindian ethnostate" thing.

No but the percentage rises every year so maybe in the future

IoI

bolivia is the closest to an amerindian ethnostate.

It reads in their constitution "plurinational, pluriethnic state".

Mexico is a Coca-Cola property

Why you say that any link ?

No. Most Mexisharts are mongrels with varying degree of Medoid and Indian blood. Their culture is Iberianized with some degree of indigenous influence. Their Mexicah LARP goes back to Criollos trying to form a national identity by admiring the Mexicah and basing their identity to that.

i have no doubts that european admixture peaked before the revolution and has been losing ground since then

i am not complaining tho, this is epic

Attached: mexicobirthratemap.png (1280x837, 296K)

these percentages are completely false

What happened to kysposter?

He already kys himself

Rip

>american OP
>thread is fucking shit-tier

as usual

Attached: 1526149355308.png (400x400, 178K)

99.9% of threads are complete shit on this board.

but especially american ones

Wow you are actually spot on 100% correct, Thank you.

El MexicANO

I’m sorry you have to see this.

El gringANO

were you getting your stats?

el mamajuEVO

Is the mexican flag the most unnecessarily convoluted one on earth?

No, it's yours unironically

nah it's mexico's

Attached: average mexican.jpg (770x1038, 68K)

No, it's yours unironically

¿por que el mexicano?

Attached: el mexicano.jpg (550x545, 32K)

>Mutt gets trips
Very unfair!

Who's asking?

>mfw my bait failed

I know you guys aren't predominantly Amerindian, I was just trying to trigger you.

Attached: AUHehhS.png (1480x1401, 765K)

Kiss me

>ruled by subhuman degenerates that make sure that they remain euro as heck
No?

Mexico is pretty much the ideal mestizo nation, their genetics are like 51% euro 49%% amerindian with some black here and there

Attached: 1531764460180.png (5832x4198, 1.68M)

why is peru so much more amerindian than mexico despite being THE other viceroyalty in the americas?

ALMOST

Peru has a huge amerindian population, roughly 40% of peruvians are amerindians (with some euro influence tho look for example at the quechua chart, they are fairly euro)
These amerindians live mostly on the highlands tho, you are not that prone to meet them in places like Jow Forums

Concerned citizen

im here

Are guys like Paolo guerrero common in Peru? He's handsome as fuck.

Attached: paolo-guerrero-tas.jpg (611x458, 31K)

because its easier to survive spa*Nshits if you are on the mountains

>Q: why is this thing this way?
>A: this thing is this way

I wouldn't take those charts as a definite genetic representation of a population since results vary a lot in different studies, but either way, I'm guessing city Quechuas have more European admixture and those in the sierra are more Amerindian.

Attached: Untitled-1.jpg (1291x544, 272K)

most of mexico is highlands, too

we dont care about it either way.

this, too

He is mestizo af, so yeah

Are you asking why so many natives are left in Peru? Because the spanish adopted the government of the incas by giving nobiliary titles to the caciques and various other leaders, that way the native communities operated as always but swore loyalty to the king of spain rather than the inca. In fact when San Martin came to "liberate" peru, he had to murder lots of loyalist caciques and ended up forcing the natives to fight.

>city quechuas
Lol wtf is that

is he mestizo?

i think we had that, too yet we don't have as many natives

>"""highlands"""

Those that are in urban areas lol

Nah you definitely didnt have it in the same way as we did.
Also the conquest here was a lot more peaceful, most natives here were extremely rural and agropecuarian, you had lots of tribes

No such thing, perhaps in the last 30 years a lot of quechuas migrated to the cities but they quickly married mestizos and their descendants renounced to quechua culture and dont identify as quechuas nor speak the language

We don't talk about that here unless YOU want problems

Attached: images(7).jpg (738x416, 48K)

and a whole lot of genocide, all that started in mexico

They'd kill all the able men, and then continue killing the rest until their sword arms gave out, then repeat for more "for fun" and bets later. The region was heavily populated before conquistadors came along and most would die of smallpox. And there were still enough left over for unimaginable killing sprees, and under the poorest, no-effort excuses.

Add in rural people getting perpetually shat on throughout the years (often nativesand native-descent folks) and latinos of mainly native descent getting genocided during the civil war (and likely the war of independence as well) and of course mexico ends up with far less natives than it should have

>their descendants renounced to quechua culture and dont identify as quechuas nor speak the language
mfw

Attached: 1515514954344.jpg (645x773, 87K)

WE ARE 100% AZTEC