How is Mexico more Amerindian than the USA and Canada when they have no reservations?

No need reservations if you don't systematically genocide them

Attached: trailoftearspainting[1].jpg (640x480, 60K)

Since 10000 bce

This

I can't grow a beard, i can just grow (pic related)

Why are you so obsessed with being white?

literally no one here is

Forgot the pic

Attached: fdhduesghstd.png (136x98, 24K)

sometimes I'm jealous of people like this, shaving is a fucking chore

meant to respond to OP

>It's literally a native American country
>mexcrement un/int/elligents wish this
keksimus

It's "Mexico" because Cortes(?) renamed the ashes of the Aztec Empire's capital "Mexico City" and crioyos don't givea damn what they name their slave state. It don't mean that they are an Amerindian state by any stretch.
They're hispanicraps mutted with Afriturds.

>*No need for reservations if you systematically genocide/assimilate them.*

What native american influence does Mexico have?

You dont see those, they live in the highlands or in the amazonean rainforest, most peruvians you meet are your average hispamutt

this

from a practical perspective beards are a disadvantage

worse if you have curly hair and it stucks in your skin

Everything

lel since fucking when?
i am forced to deal with you from time to time

like when i come to int

Why is Greenland unknown? Their entire country is fucking natives

Retards made the map

The parts near Guatemala are the more indian parts, the rest are mestizo.

i heard the reason why countries like Mexico and Peru have more Indians is because of a mix of climate (as in the Spaniards had trouble colonisng rain forest and mountains) and population density which was much higher than say the u.s and canada. i don't know how accurate this is though

*also just to be clear im not saying there wasn't a genocide against the indians in mexico and peru just that there was more of them at the time of euro contact

Americans shit on Amerindians but they venerate niggers. Fuck them.

there were more indians in Mexico than in USA and Canada so they were able to more readily assimilate the white colonizers through intermarriage. there were probably more people living in some Aztec cities than all of modern day USA and Canada

Mexican injuns lived in cities by the gorillion. The north was comparatively sparsely populated.

Yes, that's true. They had the conditions, organization, trade, etc., to support massive amounts of people. Population densities were far higher where civilizations flourished.

We could have built our houses out of wood, but decided to keep with hard materials like concrete. Because the construction techniques for it were more developed at that time.

Pretty much all the food and drinks.

The dollar sign $ comes from the Spanish Peso btw. But as everything the US like, decided to use the symbols and reclaim it as yours.

Attached: main-qimg-ebba9739758e447929779849b81db969.png (600x600, 520K)

There are a few indian communites the Spanish could never conquer, but nowadays they beg for money in touristic areas, because the government don't give a shit about them and also displaced them to built or take advantage of resources, you know, the usual.

where's the pic Huan?

We didn't kill off all of the natives and we basically raped some. Most people aren't even mestizos. This applies to every country south of Mexico too.

most of our indians died from disease, they were also near neolithic in their cultural sophistication to begin with, unless you discount the interesting peoples of the pacific coast

No joke, settlers and colonizers from the south of Europe shagged every type of native they encountered. French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italians... In Africa, in Asia, in Americas. Everywhere they came... they came.