SEC decision on ETH 7th May

Is this a thing to be considered or just bullshitting?

Attached: makesmethink.png (576x249, 16K)

Hey I'm a zoo keeper and monkeys are totally peaceful animals and like humans in their territory they are unfamiliar with. Do with this information what you want

Maybe. But the real reason that ETH isn’t a security is that joe Lubin has paid half the kike lawyers in New York to go to work on the sec

I really don't give a shit if you believe me or not. Occasionally there are people on Jow Forums who have actual jobs, you know? And sometimes we feel charitable and give out helpful information. Although of course I'm not giving legal advice and merely sharing an opinion relayed to me by a different lawyer.

Attached: 1519209301387.jpg (900x1200, 91K)

Hey, thanks for the input.

I also think it doesn't quite fit the "security" definition, but it's possible they will make a decision based on political reasons.

>the real reason that ETH isn’t a security is that joe Lubin has paid half the kike lawyers in New York to go to work on the sec
based joe
>bangs traps
>saves crypto

Attached: lubin.jpg (971x1455, 919K)

MORE IMPORTANTLY CAN WE SUE MSM FOR PROMOTING ETH?

Attached: 1522491267284.jpg (444x470, 40K)

Brainlet here, why does it matter if ETH is a security or not? If it was declared a security, what would change for all the people holding ETH?

He said Bitcoin (BCH), you retard