Are you happy with your country's leader and bonus in Civ 6? Your country IS important enough to get in, right?

Are you happy with your country's leader and bonus in Civ 6? Your country IS important enough to get in, right?

Attached: Civilization 6.png (1489x1360, 1.25M)

Teddy Roosevelt is a good choice

I'm more unhappy with how shite the game is

is this game worth spending the time to pirate or should i just keep playing civ 5

Worth it for like 3 games then uninstall

>Victoria
>England

Triggers me every time

No.

Everyone has lewd faces

Nervous?

Attached: dsaads.jpg (279x240, 19K)

where is the ukraine leader?

Not at all

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-08-13 at 02.20.38.png (460x336, 217K)

Poor whoever the fuck that girl is.

>country
>ukraine

Attached: 15334742071280.png (447x447, 91K)

>alexander
>macedonia

yes, trajan's alright :)

there are definitly better choices than hardrada but i like that we finally made it this time

Didn't he genocide you or something?

Civ5 > Civ6

Kek, I just noticed how much Roosevelt looks like Alex Jones

Civ4 with all the add ons is better than both

Not, I'm not. Peter is way too overused and his bonus doesn't match my playstyle.

>Jadwiga - bonus to converting cities
Noooo, my pagan ass is on fire!!

Civ4 is great but I like how Civ5 gave all the civs unique abilities. Civ4 civs are too vanilla, and 95% of the unique units are ho-hum.

>Cree
>Scythia
>Nubia
>Zulu
Why did so many literal who civs get in

>american education strikes again

Give me one achievement the Cree made.

I wasn't talking about them but about the other 3.

The Zulu are remembered exclusively for winning one battle.

>are remembered
You said that. It doesn't matter why are you remembered. It only matters if you are remembered at all.

Why is alexander so smug?

no, i miss bismarck :(

Attached: 2B848B7F-557A-4F4A-8AE1-F9514352687E.jpg (511x363, 152K)

I only remember them for losing one battle

Is that like all of Russia's foreign policy?

omg worst historical line up ever

Attached: 1533685958613.jpg (379x364, 81K)

Attached: 1.png (227x152, 64K)

It seems they just picked a bunch of literally who civs/leaders to get ((((diversity)))))

No i am not, because Peter is overrated as ruler and overused in games and mass culture.

same as every civ

>no Pheonicia
>no Turkey/Seljuks
>no Portugal
>no Siam
>no Polynesians
>no Ethiopea
>Norway instead of Sweden or Denmark
>no Austria/AH
>no Venice/modern Italy
>no Yugoslavia/Serbia/Croatia
>Second Indian leader isn't Akbar or at least someone from a different area or culture group than Hindustani Hinduism

>Fucking Australia

>no israel

Honestly if Australia is in then we (and Mexico) should be in too.

Somehow Israel has not made itself in any of Civ series. Kinda weird why. Yet some of the series does have Judaism as one of religions

Would be too contraversial I guess, both modern and biblical.

>Siam
>Polynesians
>Ethiopia
>Balkan shitholes

lmao no.

As a longtime fan of the series, I really wanted to love Civ 6 but I find it totally impossible to get into like I always did with the previous ones. I'm not even totally sure why, I just don't feel it. If I were to play Civ right now I'd start a new game in 5.

delet

He's the only acceptable choice

Tomirys was sorta gay but alright choice

>bonus to combat on home continent
It should be the opposite, bonus to expeditionary warfare.

I think they're more about representing natives and sub Saharan Africans in general.
But fuck they added Australia because there are lots of civil fans here so they'd get more sales so who knows

alexander and phillip op

Peter was allies (sort of) with Poland, though. It was Catherine that started raping them.

If they wanted to do Australia they should have done the abos.

He's better than Catherine the Overrated, at least.