Why was colonization of the new world so different than of the old world? I.e. mass euro immigration...

outside south africa and some islands the portuguese settled, mulattos aren't common anywhere

African Mestizos means mesitizos (European/Native) with African ancestory.

Most Cape Coloreds are more multi-racial then that.

Because Africa is ugly and filthy.

>Why didnt euros migrate to africa/imdia like they the americas?
because india was full and africa was too poor
>Why are there no african mestizos?
There are.
>Was it the distance and the length of the journey that required larger colonies to be set up?
No.

> africa
> old world

malagasy descend from austronesian and bantu peoples

>africa isn't the old world
t. brainlet

>African Mestizos means mesitizos (European/Native) with African ancestory.
That would be a tri-racial, user. Also those don't exist there because there. was no reason to take Native Americans to Africa.

user being a white settler in Africa outside of non-brits in SA was legit being pampered lol.

>first continent to ever be inhabited by hominids.
>not old

Africa in SSA was nothing old to euros it just was ugly and filthy filled with disease.

Attached: Maya-Lin-Storm-King-8087342696-700x467.jpg (700x467, 158K)

how the fuck is that related to europeans or mulattos?

>That would be a tri-racial

Yes but how the group identifies themselves differs.

Its not old world as Europeans have never been there before and Africa is completely different biomes to europe.

In the new world you could fish, hunt, trap furs, raise cattle, chop wood, farm, and develop cities and villages.

I'm saying they're mixed

How can you know how a group identifies itself if said group does not exist?

As in Afro-Mestizos not existing?

how about you start commenting some actually related stuff?

the western cape has a Mediterranean climate, which is why it was settled first

In a nice climate without hearing africans.

Afro Mestizos aren't a thing

the ethiopian highlands have a temperate climate, but it's a bit difficult to try to settle when you don't control a country

although individual euros have settled there a lot in the past

And the Mestico's in Mozambique, Angola and Guinea-Bissau and in many parts of the American South, The Carribean and many Coloreds in Southern Africa like the Basters and the Sudanese Arabs if you consider Arabs white.

>user being a white settler in Africa outside of non-brits in SA was legit being pampered lol.
im going to need proofs of that

Well, but it definitely not new since their coasts were explored by the Portuguese even before the discovery of the Americas. The Roman Empire even had a good part of Northen Africa, as well.

But they are. It's not even weird really. There's mestizos with Black ancestry in many parts of Latin America.

The free land Britsh gave to white people in Kenya?

Most of the time the African admixture is insignificant.

Not really. why is this so problematic with you. It's a region by region basis. Guatamala has 3.2% of it's population having significant Afro ancestory.

autistic fuck is that the hdi of your cunt?

It's Afro-Latino, not Afro-Mestizo disgustingly ignorant agenda driven leaf

Those aren't mutually exclusive.

do you know what the word common means
>American South, The Carribean
you realize we're talking about africa, right?
>and many Coloreds in Southern Africa
which is why i mentioned it in my comment lol
>if you consider Arabs white
of course not wtf

tf
tp

They are. Deal with it.

n-no...

>not really
>3.2% significant Afro ancestry
That's not a lot

he's talking about "afro-mestizos".

How so?

>Outside south africa and some islands the portuguese settled, mulattos aren't common anywhere

What did you mean by this then because that sentence implies that outside those areas mullatoes aren't common. You didn't specify Africa.

3% of your population having visible African ancestory is pretty notable though.

>thread is about African colonization
>asks him to specify location, making his post redundant

i don't need to when the original comment is talking about africa...

Mestizo = White/Native

It's really not

>problematic

Attached: 1534310072441.jpg (336x357, 66K)

Afro-Mestizo=Mestizo with notable African ancestor.

Native Americans died in massive numbers from Eurasian diseases. Smallpox spread fast, most who died never even heard of Europeans. This made colonization easier.

India was too populous already to colonize in that manner. China likewise. Unfair trade deals and safe harbors could be extracted, but population transfers were limited. There already was a low-wage labor force in those countries.

Africa, on the other hand, was full of deadly diseases. It was only colonized in the late 19th century. Coastal slave trade is not really colonization. Africa, without modern medicine, is simply an inhospitable shithole.

That's a tri-racial

>problematic

Attached: 1533922811877.jpg (1280x720, 108K)

Then that's not a Mestizo anymore

Africa is the oldest world

>Why was colonization of the new world so different than of the old world? I.e. mass euro immigration. Why didnt euros migrate to africa/imdia like they the americas?

The first Europeans tended to exercise a lot of their own private authority and power, conquering territory in the name of their patron so they could manage it themselves. This incentivized a lot of people to come because they could get a lot of land. Also, the focus was on conquering and getting land to settle and rule with the New World while Africa and Asia was more about the mission to civilize and imperialism. The distinction is that with the New World, the intent was to settle it with Europeans while the Old the intent was to set up a colonial administration for the exploitation of resources and people for the sake of the colonial power. In exchange, they gave the colonial peoples access to their technology and protection.

Also, a lot of Euros did migrate and settle in Africa and Asia. But a lot also left when colonialism ended.

>Why are there no african mestizos?

There are, look up Cape Coloreds and Anglo-Indians. There's load of racial intermingling there.

Yes Afro-mestizo's are tri-racial group but it also has another meaning. Mestizos who have African ancestory but overall are like their other Mestizo counterparts nearby with less/no African admixture culturally for the most part.

Why is this leaf literally making up identities that don't exist here? For what purpose?

Your census literally has it on the paper.

Afro mestizo is used more as a synonym for mulatto, the original meaning of mestizo is "mixed race".

Afro-Mexican is not Afro-Mestizo

Well the Intercensus Estimate. 2020 it will have it on the census itself

Stop talking about Latin America

We pulled the white Indonesians back to the Netherlands.
This didn't happen to South Africa, because it was taken over by the British.

>Afro mestizo is used more as a synonym for mulatto

Since when? Any source on that?