There's more genetic difference between west Africans(majority of African Americans) and east Africans then there is...

Also Africa is the most genetically diversity place on earth. So it's not like a rocket science that they dont look exact the same.

So europeans are closer to KANGZ than african americans?

Yes
all the great pre-colonial African kingdoms were in North and Eastern Africa who are more closer to Europeans
west African were isolated and had not achieved anything for thousand of years

Attached: transatlantic-slave-trade.jpg (1488x996, 171K)

They did have some civilisations like mali and the yoruba kingdoms but yeah, pretty grim for the most part.

Its kind of weird to think that east coast africans and europeans are more similar genetically than west and east africans are

all non africans are descended from small groups of ancient east africans but modern east africans are the result of a back migration from the middle east. they are mixed african-caucasian.

Yeah it just made me stop and think about how dumb all those pol memes about race are

Jow Forums memes is why swedes need to replace themselves with somalians.

That's just a result of so called origin diversity, in which there is a greater diversity of genetics within the origin population of migrating species than the migrating ones. Nothing special.

a true testament to how primitive they are

just go outside moron

Like I said above African Americans and by Americans I mean 99% of Blacks in the America continent and neighboring Caribbean islands are descended form western Africans while the girl in pic is east African

Attached: Americas_(orthographic_projection).svg.png (1200x1200, 342K)

the genetic distance between a west African and a Japanese is actually higher than between a coyote and a wolf

>He genetically close to east asian.
ew

>just go outside moron

Attached: Nick-Bateman-4.jpg (473x697, 74K)

What do you mean by "East African"?

If you are talking about the Horn, then this is true. But this is not true with Bantu East Africans or Nilotic populations.

Niger-Congo populations probably originated from the East(Nuba Mountains).

>west African were isolated and had not achieved anything for thousand of years
Come on....

Some of the finest works in metals of sub-Saharan Africa(ile-ife sculptures, Igbo-Ukwu), some of the wealthiest commercial states etc... were all in West Africa.

Attached: 320px-Cabeza_de_rey_(ciudad_yoruba)-Brass-16thcentury.jpg (320x596, 55K)

Functional difference is the name of the game though

i thought people from oceania were the most genetically distant from africans but this pic shows them closer to africans than east asians.

No, this pic show that they are closer to the people of the Americas and East Asia, while less close to Africans.

my point was i thought oceanians were the furthest from africans but that pic shows east asians as the furthest from africans.

>Mfw genetic anthropology has already revealed some massively uncomfortable truths about our species' history but the research is too taboo and new to be widely reported

Human races from different parts of the world have been on their own divergent evolutionary paths for hundreds of thousands years, not tens of thousands as previously thought. It also seems like we're much more mixed with our ancestor species (neanderthals, erectus, X number of other unrecognized fellas) than we expected, which only amplifies the genetic differences between regions. Screenshot and remember this post when inevitably (if this kind of research is allowed/funded in the future) we're going to start seeing headlines like "new scientific data might look like it confirms racist theories, but here's 10 reasons why you should ignore that".

Btw this "more genetic diversity between Africans than Africans and Eurasians" study is from 2002 and not that relevant anymore. It just became a worldwide "feel good" story because of it's nature. Genetic research these days is light years ahead of that time.

Attached: 1481131682772.jpg (353x424, 30K)

>self-hating Timur's wet dream to fight for muh white race
That's right, coincidences should serve as major measure in the determination of enmities, that's why you're going to get kicked out of Europe back into Siberia

why do you even care, you aren't white, you dumb ching chong

what does it even mean by "more genetic difference"? i've read research saying people within an ethnic group are actually more genetically different to each other than to someone from another ethnic group.
i'm no polf*g but this really seems deliberately misleading. the important things to study would be what actually are the genetic differences among members of an ethnic group vs what are the differences between two ethnic groups. wouldn't it make sense that we have *more* differences to members of our own race since we breed with each other and genetic diversity is important? whereas there may be less genetic difference between any given european and african, but the actual differences are major things literally not found anywhere at all in each others respective population. I mean we're 70% identical to a banana.