what does he gain by supporting a competing project (bch)?
seriously asking, no troll, i'm just a brainlet
Serious question
Joseph Flores
William Brooks
When was it found out that he does?
Colton Myers
Isaac James
Mason Wilson
Bch is more damaging to BTC than eth so by supporting bch he brings the flippening closer
Wyatt Moore
Divide and conquer.
He knows bch is inflammatory garbage, but he also knows that a house divided cannot stand.
Camden Thompson
he doesn't gain anything, just like he doesn't gain anything by developing ethereum, he's already a multi millionaire. He's an autist who sometimes is right and sometimes is wrong and just wants do develop crypto and thinks that bch is the future of bitcoin, which is not surprising for anyone who isn't a brainlet.
hijacking development + bcash propaganda + censorship showed the true colors of the btc devs. It's easy to see for anyone that's not a brainlet like yourself that they will kill bitcoin sooner or later
Henry Price
Maybe because BCH works better than BTC. He is also a fundamentalist when it comes to the true purpose of BTC.... BCH is closer to the original value set
Elijah Howard
compelling perspective
Jeremiah Myers
>BCH is closer to the original value set
No, actually it's not. (Muh EDA). Your chain is forever invalid.
Dominic Cox
Yeah two bitcoins creates a lot of confusion and weakens the original.
Josiah Barnes
Because if big blocks were implemented in the first place, Ethereum would never have existed... Vitalik wanted to build smart contract programming language on the bitcoin blockchain becuase that would be more secure and not divide the hash power. However he was cock-blocked by core Devs who didn't want "spam" on the bitcoin blockchain. His end game is to kill Ethereum the coin (ETH at zero dollars), and put Ethereum the code (what he really cares about) onto Bitcoin(BCH) so the world computer system is more robust, for the benefit of all humanity.
One coin will rule them all, and its name is Bitcoin(BCH)
Blake Gutierrez
delusion
Anthony Roberts
this
Brody Perry
interesting. why would he want to kill his own project though? where's the upside?
Oliver Kelly
Adam Gray
What did Zuckerberg get out of buying instagram?
Gabriel Bailey
He's butthurt because the core team rejected him so he made ethereum
Jaxon Murphy
Eth is a security, while BTC and bch aren't.
Blake Taylor
>The 24 year old developer
Connor Harris
He only like bch becuase corecucks are to scared of using new ideas to scale and he supports innovation
Aaron Adams
In all seriousness, I think he really doesn't care about ETH as much as the general crypto space and using it to better people's lives. He likes BCH because it lowers transaction costs but is caution about Ver and whatthefuckhisnameis. He likes bitcoin as a truly indestructible currency system but is obviously looking beyond PoW.
Christian Green
I think Bcash will win because it seems like in the last few years, every time the western world has had to make a major political decision they pick the most retarded option possible. In this case Bcash.
Michael Sanchez
This
Aiden Turner
why doesnt vitalik employ a dermatoligist
Hunter Anderson
Nothing. He's a super autist, so he zeroes in on facts and emotions confuse him. There is no doubt that keeping the blocksize at 1mb is a bad decision and is holding bitcoin back.
Jason Lee
that hasn't been formally decided afaik. and if bch gains the smart contract capabilities of eth, wouldn't that technically put it in the same category?
Wyatt Richardson
>uses Segwit
>calls other chains invalid
Josiah Reyes
No, the reason eth is a security is because of the original sale method, not the smart contracts.
Owen Robinson
More than 70% of transactions in BTC don't use segwit. That 70% is still 100 times the bch usage.
What is your problem with segwit anyway?
Landon Peterson
He was maligned by the core developers for the entirety of his project.
Noah Butler
oh, ok interesting. looks like I need to do more research.
Jayden Johnson
>eth is a security
Andrew Morris
It literally removes signatures from transactions. Technically making it not a crypto, as a blockchain is a series of digital signatures.
Matthew Moore
It's not a security yet, but it satisfies the conditions to be defined as one.
Connor Brooks
Ethereum is not a security lol
Nolan Thompson
>twitter.com
>That said, *right now*, I think trying to claim "BCH = bitcoin" is a bad idea, as it *is* a minority opinion in the "greater bitcoin community".
Alexander Rivera
Who told you that crap? Remember, 70% of BTC transactions would still be fine by your standards anyway even if that was correct.
Adam Green
Told me what crap? Do you seriously not understand how Segwit works?
Nathan Phillips
Actually, I do. That's what makes the crap you just produced so baffling.
Kayden Price
>Technically making it not a crypto, as a blockchain is a series of digital signatures.
Please stop with this nonsense. Retardation like this damages the image of BCH.
Jayden Perez
he clearly qualifies that it's a minority opinion, but his prior statement denotes his support does it not?
Levi Jones
Tell me how Segwit works then.
Okay fuckboi. This magic DLT we call blockchain is nothing more than a database in which a ledger of transactions are recorded. Each transaction has a timestamp and digital signature which is validated by a miner and then added to the next block in a chain of blocks. So do tell, how is a blockchain not a series of digital signatures. I'll wait.
Jonathan Reyes
He owns both bch and btc. He thought BTC would scale to be used as money, rather than a digital beanie baby turd smear on a blank canvas.
ETH was meant to be used for fueling contracts. It was never intended to be used as a store of value or medium of exchange. Just a medium to support dapps.
BCH is the bitcoin chain that actually runs faster and cheaper than ETH. And he doesn't seem to have an issue with the inflation or brand dilution that BCH has caused.
At this point, ETH's main use case is shitting out coins whenever anybody feels like they should print their own money to either bypass VC funding or just LARP like a central banker.
Ethan Johnson
he's a man of principle, I can see him supporting a bigger block size
but if a single tweet is all you have, then I don't think he gives a shit about either at this point
Adrian James
Well, I"m wrong about how I thought segwit worked, but you're still way off. The signature is still part of the transaction in segwit.
Joshua Gutierrez
the witness is not the signature retard
Nathan Robinson
He knows there is no future for core coin so might as well suck up to the future winners
Zachary White
Segwit's entire function is to separate transactions from signature data to make more space on the puny 1MB block.
Nice self portrait.
Asher Allen
Vivaldi hates Bitcoin and wants the number one spot for his coin.
Bitcoin Cash is no competitor. This whole smartcontract, extension blocks, colored coins, etc. meme is a joke.
10 minute blocks and no plans for something like sharding. Bch is just another one of these eth killers with no code, no adoption, no anything.
Tyler Wilson
He's already made a hundred million or more, why does he care which blockchain is more prevalent going forward? Maybe he wants the entire idea of blockchains to flourish, whether it means Ethereum is #1 or it completely falls to the wayside in a decade.
Tyler Scott
This. I honestly don't think he has some ulterior motive. He's just speaking his mind.
Eli Brown
I don't understand how you could even separate signatures from transactions. The signature is the only way you can verify the sender.
Brody Turner
he follows what is logical
Carson Reed
agreed, some people care more about the idea than the money.
Landon Martin
Vitalik is literally Jesus
He is here to redeem our sins and show us the way.