Chainlink is finished?

why do we fall, master bruce?

Attached: nolinkersbtfo.png (3546x1456, 941K)

> it is a network of trust that enables trustless tech like blockchain to connect to a world in a manner that is also trustless.

This is literally what a decentralized oracle is.
You have proven you have no concept of the current reality of chainlink. The project has done nothing of note and the testnet is not at all revolutionary. Chainlink does not have a solution to the billion dollar oracle problem, stop deluding yourself. I have researched chainlink, it is a bad investment.

70k linkie here, didnt care about the OP but the cult like braindead replies ITT has got me worried..

Attached: 1446085921296s.jpg (241x228, 8K)

>delduded.
yeah no.

dude dgb hype lasted for 2 months. its been, what 7 months and counting since LINK came out. so whats your fucking point?

There is a difference between their test net code and what they did as a proof of concept for swift. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT EVEN IF SWIFT USED THE CONCEPTS IN THE POC THEY WOULD USE THE TOKEN.

See you when you’ve been holding this for two years and it still hasn’t mooned.

Attached: sergey punching tv reporter.webm (640x360, 2.83M)

The true idea of a decentralized oracle solves the problem of centralized data sources. Nobody has come up to a solution to this billion+ dollar problem. Multiple data feeds could still be gamed.

I was merely representing the fact that chainlink testnet only incorporates one datasource and the contracts are hardly optimal even with one data source. Chainlink has not done anything notable and from an investment perspective seems poor.

market sell your shit

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-05-11 at 12.11.19 AM.png (872x130, 31K)