Which is the best?

Late war 109s could hold with the mustang with MW50 at some altitudes. If they had had 150 octane fuel, maybe it would br pretty close. But they didn't, so the p51 is the best by quite a margin.

FW-190 and F6F Hellcat were the best planes of the war.

>Germany for early war

yes because that showed during the Battle of Britain

as warthunder expert I can safely say that La-5 was best plane of ww2

Attached: la5.jpg (800x482, 162K)

AT THAT TIME , JAPAN QUALITY? wwwwwwwwwwww (笑)

No love for this Mediterranean cutie?

Attached: 260px-Macchi200_c.jpg (260x155, 7K)

Normies can recognize the other planes but Ki-43 isn't famous at all.

I'm not. Soviet elite pilots used american fighters.

The P-51D is undoubthably best on that list, possibly on par with some late model Bf-109s (G models)

Retarded tactics isnt an indication of how good the planes where, also, its allways easier to be on the defence.

Hellcat would get raped over Europe.

Fw190 had a billion models over the course of the war.

I dont think quality was a concern for suicide pilots.

>warthunder
Spitfire F Mk24, Ki-84 Hei and P-51 H-5 NA are better

>tactical edges win or lose wars
>slightly better equipment wins or loses wars
Germans had better planes, pilots and equipment in general at the Battle of Britain. They lost because the operation was strategically not viable and they made dumb targeting decisions.

Best of the single-engined pistonfighters of WW2 was probably the F4U Corsair

>Normies can recognize the other planes

No, they can't

depends on the model

And most effective, Kozhedub, who was from ukrainian SSR, uses this

stand aside comrades

Attached: Lavochkin_La7.jpg (852x522, 61K)

P-51

>P-51 H-5 NA
Maybe at high heights
>Spitfire F Mk24, Ki-84 Hei
Lol they're miles worse
t.warthunder pro

>as a russian bias pro

Maybe for different countries there is different flight models, pretty sure takechi plays on dmm. Japan bias, lol.

Attached: a9pvm2K_700b_v1.jpg (700x961, 71K)

Im pretty sure he has j7w1

You need a 5th option

Attached: 954_rd.jpg (500x277, 37K)

Noice

this
RAF was great as well though, and Britain as well as the Soviets made some outstanding planes

Attached: 68780_1348919436.jpg (1280x867, 645K)

Spitfire vs Mustang 1v1 who wins?

Germans

depends on the pilot

Actually very nice just not produced in significant numbers

Italians had no good enough engines though, they had to use German engines instead

Attached: rgegregttrg.jpg (1347x930, 182K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_II_flying_aces

Any questions?

why you've lost then

just because the German air force was retarded enough to not make aces train youg pilots but keep them in the air until they were shot down eventually doesn't mean our aircraft or air force as a whole was best
Luftwaffe absolutely got raped from 1943 onward, no need to be delusional about that

>Counting by bomber engines

Attached: erih-hartmann.jpg (378x500, 28K)

IF I WAS IN WORLD WAR TWO THEY'D CALL ME SPITFIRE

CAUSE YOU KNOW THAT I CAN

Attached: lead-lr[1].jpg (1100x618, 51K)

as warthunder expert I can safely say that Yak 9k was better

Attached: Yakovlev_Yak-9K[1].jpg (700x306, 53K)

Nah you're bad at WT

>all these warthunder babies
True cancer play cliffs of Dover

hartmann served in the eastern front,and had under 20 bomber kills,so touche,vasili blyatkov

>shoots fridge at you
>rips your plane in half
heh nothing personnel comrade

Cherry Blossom

Attached: 桜花.jpg (1080x1131, 834K)

for ww2 fighters
spitfire for aesthetics
mustang for performance

The Bf-109 and the Zero were good... in 1939. Late Mustang shits all over them.
>take-off from your comfy uk base
>escort the bombers all the way inside germany
>chill at 35K+ feet for hours
>boom and zoom helpless germs
>bubble canopy that would make some modern fighters jealous
>engine is merlin but made to be mass producible
>fucktons made

It's cool but
>fails to do the main thing it was designed for: carrier ops
later they fixed it i think but too late for ww2

allied fighter pilots usually went to aviation school after they get some kill counts to raise greater number of skilled pilots

axis fighter pilots keep participating into mission

when after axis ace pilots killed in action, only school boy tier pilots left

Not so fast

Attached: p_4514ec56ab.jpg (800x600, 43K)

How good is it compared to late war prop aircraft like say Bearcat ?

Attached: 6ade30830974d48480cb128e5228c722[1].jpg (750x502, 53K)

Attached: 1526284210845.png (808x565, 530K)

The pilot of the bearcat wouldn't know what hit him
youtube.com/watch?v=7KFdtGo4vpU

back when I played it(2012-2013) la-5 was so good that wehraboos were literally forced to buy german premium one otherwise they faced entire team of soviet la-5's and bf-109 couldn't do SHIT

spit = bf109 >>>> p51 >> zero

what's that ? Australian internet friendly Shrek ?

>Mitsubishi Motors

He should have asked it to Mitsubishi heavy industry.

French boi

Attached: 555.jpg (274x184, 4K)

These modern light attackers have tricked out avionics and turboprops that give great realiability and good low altitude performance, but a late war piston engined fighter would simply leave them in the dust in a dogfight. They're low and slow, built for dropping JDAMs on goatfuckers not dogfighting.

Attached: maxresdefault(10).jpg (1280x720, 84K)

I always thought the Spitfire was based as fuck, Keith Miller used to fly one