So the only solution would be to de-urbanize Brazil and turn its economy into agriculture-based one again?
Btw, I think your point of view is kinda flawed and limited since I guess you're part of white middle class like probably every Brazilian itt. Even if the cities (where white middle class lived) were safer/wealthier 50 years ago than now, it doesn't mean Brazil as a whole was such a paradise. If there were no blacks in the cities, it means they were in rural lands and suffered there even more (that's why they migrated to the cities after all, as life in rural areas was hell). So overall Brazil wasn't as good as you imagine it to be.
Brandon Richardson
I think buying/making nukes shouldn't be a big problem for such a big and rich country like Brazil.
Daniel Hall
>So the only solution would be to de-urbanize Brazil t. Pol Pot >and turn its economy into agriculture-based one again? It's already that. You don't need millions living around farmland for it to be productive. In fact, it's the opposite.
Easton Evans
I would love to have parliamentarism, federalism, first past the post voting and descentralize the revenue but I don't think it will ever happen. >So the only solution would be to de-urbanize Brazil and turn its economy into agriculture-based one again? No, the solution is to police shit, actually incarcerate criminals and un-fuck the smaller local economies. >Brazil as a whole was such a paradise >Brazil wasn't as good as you imagine it to be. When did I say that? All I said is that crime rates were low then.
Isaiah Moore
> So overall Brazil wasn't as good as you imagine it to be. It was never "good", it just wasn't as criminal.
Anthony Rivera
>All I said is that crime rates were low then.
Or maybe rural nigs killed other nigs for a piece of bread but simply no one cared about that and report it to the police?
>No, the solution is to police shit, actually incarcerate criminals and un-fuck the smaller local economies.
Your prisons would explode then.
>t. Pol Pot
I'm actually surprised how urbanized Brazil is. You could relieve housing shortage by moving more people into the villages.
>You could relieve housing shortage by moving more people into the villages. And have them do what? Raise chickens? It's cheaper to have them in cities because you can have most major companies in one place. Urbanization is an inevitablility around the world, and happens independent of government. And whenever a particularly murderous commie tyrant tries to de-urbanize the country (like fucking pol pot), millions die. This is a recipe for disaster. We could maybe develop the interior more and make more smaller cities, but that's also expensive and it wouldn't necessarily work.
Jeremiah Evans
>Or maybe rural nigs killed other nigs for a piece of bread but simply no one cared about that and report it to the police? Conjectures. >Your prisons would explode then. They already are, but it's not enough, I don't care if we have to build prisons to incarcerate 20 million people, it's one of the things I don't mind paying taxes for. People in here commit crime because there is easy opportunity and very little consequence for doing it. Once that stops being the case the trend is for crime rates to go down, for example in São Paulo even the bigger crime syndicates are more careful about murder because the more well-funded police in this state investigates a much higher % of murders than in other states.
