Why doesn't Europe re-colonize Africa? It would be doing most of them a favor

It’s not neo-colonialism, China is just looking to expand their market. Buliding infrastructure in Africa helps both the African countries and China.
China has asked the African leaders first, and they agreed to build infrastructure.

OBSESSED
¿por que siempre que sale españa en un hilo tienes que decir tus pildoritas? podrias hacer namefag, obseso

Do Mexicans still hold a grudge against Spain? I wonder if the American born ones are more mad than the Mexican born ones.

Thats interesting, well i guess theres hope for Spain and Portugal. Are the birth rates for Spaniards and Portuguese high or are they German level, which is tiny atm.

Spain has a very old median age and low birth rate, wich is a huge burden for the country since a lot of taxes go into inflated retirements for old people. The laws that pass benefit old people instead of new people because thats where voters are.
very few do, i think they're a minority

Spain and Protoplasm offer nothing though in general from the well educated to the lowly labourer.

>neighboring african countries to illegally immigrate

Is a meme though user.

Well thats unfortunate. Maybe the birth rates will go up sometime soon. I heard that in Romania all the young people leave and the old people stay behind, left to I guess take care of themselves. Crazy stuff. Also would you say its safe to travel to Spain at the moment with all thats going on. Someone from Germany told me that its not safe to go out at night. I've heard Portugal is nice.

>with all thats going on
whats going on?
i live in the north its pretty quiet here, ive heard theres some minor stealings in Madrid or Barcelona towards tourists that dont pay attention to their luggage, but violent crimes are super rare
if you want to have a 100% safe experience go to bumfuck nowhere or some of the minor "touristic" places like Segovia, Santiago, Mérida...

Oh i was referring to the constant income of refugees. Italy seems to have put a stop to it on their side. I always read that Germany has it bad. Sweden too. I was just wondering how Spain was holding up. Also thats good to hear. And Ill keep those places in mind. Would it be expensive to travel to Spain?

>how hard could it be winning against guerrillas with no armored vehicles?

Ask to americans after Vietnam and Syria

Colonies are net lost

fuck off to Jow Forums

No they aren't. That's like saying public schooling is a net loss.

>constant income of refugees
3 refugees per day in a 46 million people country isnt a big deal

Doesn't stop the hysteria though.

Because its not worth it
And because governments are not lead by autistic gsg players

>And because governments are not lead by autistic gsg players
and thats a bad thing...

still, you have as many gypsies as the hungarians or romanians

fpbp

Why?
Most of europe is empty undeveloped african tier

Nothing is gained by colonies we dont need any resource.

Colonies are a meme, the british managed to lose money on india while making us poor at the same time.

Seemingly equitable business arrangements and regime changes in Africa are way better than colonialism at securing resources.

>Nothing is gained by colonies we dont need any resource.

But powers did gain resources and more from their colonies? What the hell is with this revisionist "we'd got nothing from da colonies" bullshit some morons spew?

Can't, Europe is mentally ill and suffers from brown cancer at the moment.

>the british managed to lose money on india while making us poor at the same time.

Pretty sure they made a "profit" (what people mean by profits is vague) but colonies aren't really for the profits (much more).

Tell me what exactly any European economy wants from Africa.

You are forgetting Americans actually believe this

Colonies in Africa were a venture of state power, and for the trade of some ivory and other trade goods now abundant in the west.

Most of europe and the us is empty without civilization why waste money and time developing foreign lands.

>Why doesn't Europe re-colonize Africa?
Why would they? The whole point of colonization is the extraction of natural resources and markets for selling goods. Africans now doing that by themselves.

For example the US developed miami a city of 2.7 million and a gdp of 282 billion in 1910 it had 0 civilization and a population of 1910 now it rivals the total economy of Greece.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-09-10-06-45-53.png (720x1280, 135K)

Why, what's the point? Is it so you can go and wank in Jow Forums with your le epic magapede friends about how it's 'the return of the huwite man and a strong yurope' just cause of it? Colonisation stopped being profitable ages ago.

>for the trade of some ivory and other trade goods now abundant in the west.

I dunno minerals, land, food+cash crops, access to ports, large pool of soldiers to draw from, tourism, large captive markets etc etc.

>what's the point
To help africans since they are a bit handicapped.

Like does france or America have cocoa bean plantations?

None of which are wanted or needed for import or trade.

I buy all my farm goods locally from farms.

China is already doing that. At the cost of huge debts, sure, but it's a better idea than colonisation. It's just what the Chinese do best, they know how to economically entrap other countries to depend on them. The Chinese are smart and a lot more subtle in how they do things, it's a better way nowadays.

>Colonisation stopped being profitable ages ago.

It still was, if coverage media didn't exist back then, the mau mau rebellion would have been another failed african rebellion in imperial history.

Now you are bring obtuse as hell.

>Ore resources in Africa are abundant, and extremely more so nowadays as other continents are beginning to face depletion of resources. The copper belt in Katanga, the diamond mines in Sierra Leone, Angola, and Botswana are well known for their abundance and rich produce

>70% of the world's Phosphorous is located in Morocco

>Guinea has the largest bauxite reserves in the world

>Niger and Namibia hold the 5th and 6th biggest Uranium reserves respectively

>Madagascar, Mozambique and South Africa contain some of the biggest reserves of Titanium in the world

>Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone and DR Congo are some of the biggest exporters of diamond worldwide.

You are a clueless subhuman.

None of which are wanted or needed.

lol are you even older than 18? Do you know what bauxite is? It's aluminium ore. Do you know Aluminium is used for?

I think you're just being a "le epic troll" here desu.

I'd like to see how would any country actually attempt to colonise any part of Africa now and not be scrutinized by the UN. You're also forgetting it's a bigger logistical headache to actually colonise people nowadays, it's not as easy anymore. Colonisation just isn't that profitable anymore and it's not that easy to do. The golden age for it passed, now other things are more profitable.

Alluminium recycling has been a norm here already for many decades.
We effectevily use only small amounts of it every year.
Phosphor. Who the fuck needs this?
Uranium is ok but the entire reserves already go to Europe from Niger and Namibia.

Steel is also there in abundance and rare earth for electronics you can't find in Africa.

Oil is a thing but the usage is in decrease.

Africa is way more interesting for developing Nations. For us they have very little of value.

>You're also forgetting it's a bigger logistical headache to actually colonise people nowadays, it's not as easy anymore.

Back then it was quite easy. The british actually refined it to an art.

>Colonisation just isn't that profitable anymore and it's not that easy to do.

Considering the many places in the world with massive untapped resources both renewable and non-renewable as well as the sheer utility says other wise. I didn't say they could do it now (they could but sanctions) but back then if independence efforts had no sympathizers, us and ussr weren't a factor and people outside colonise areas gave no shit it could have easily stayed much longer.

>Oil is a thing but the usage is in decrease.

Still extremely important.

>For us they have very little of value.
You say that despite the massive amount of western companies working in Africa, foreign meddling from the developed world's (and ussr), many developed nations seeking out africa fir trade and dialogue(turns out China scared the West to realising they aren't entitled to the continent).

Tanzania and helium, cocoa exports as well. Tourism and wildlife too.

None of those resources are needed.

We have VW in Ghana.
But that's not resource extracting rather to get a consumer market and succesfull buisness in Africa.
You know some African countries develop get cash and want to buy things.

>Ethiopia
>Colonize

Oh come on, they didn't even occupy all of it during the OCCUPATION.

You guys also have a lot of companies that make mining equipment for companies on the continent.

Because colonization isn't as profitable as it used to be, back then looting resources and killing the locals was an easy way to get wealth, but now that capitalism has taken over globally it is far more profitable to just have them give you the resources in exchange for "investments" that are basically just a way to get cheap labor since your populace isn't willing to work for slave wages.

I wish that Europe re-colonize Asia(ex-JP).
It will be for both Europeans and them.

Attached: main-qimg-44cf5e7d9dd0a926b71d226959d7a6a3-c.jpg (602x522, 127K)

So you should GET OUT of middle east

>None of those resources are needed.

So GET OUT of middle east

Ohhh yeahh.. Russians are already kicking your mercenaries out of there