Is the final redpill realizing that this timeline is all one big joke that you have zero agency over...

You unironically say the same I say

Not really. Why is everyone else my fucking responsibility? Why should I give a fuck because they apparently speak the same language as me? I have my own life to deal with.

Yep. If you create the soviets, eventually the provisional government cannot last.

don't dismiss collectivism just because you disagree with traditional ethnonationalism
consider other forms such as ideological/philosophical collectivism, where you find other people who think like you/came to the same conclusions as you
you could form a group with angry memers like yourself and look out for each other

gommies gotta go

It's not your responsiblity. It's just that if you turn inwards you only have power over your own autonomy. Only by mutual action can you change the conditions and systems which empose the will of others upon you. As an individual you are weaker than a group.

Just using a historical metaphor. Although
>being unironically anti-communist

Attached: grug meme.jpg (582x449, 35K)

the ideals of communism are great but as it is theorised and understood in practise, it doesn't work
show me a working form of communism that doesn't rely on violent oppression of its citizenry to maintain itself and I will give you a revolution

The final REDpill is realising that the workers of the world must unite in their fight against the captialists and seize the means of production

Attached: Great October Socialist Revolution 1917 Lenin Speech Painting.jpg (1000x692, 165K)

I guess, but I just can't find the energy to really care about politics or get militant about it. I feel it's a waste of time and not a very fulfilling way of life when I have to consider other peoples goals alongside my own. I doubt other people would really think of me in the same way I'd think about them, so I just won't. In theory what you said makes a lot of sense, but reality isn't like that unfortunately.

>show me a working form of communism that doesn't rely on violent oppression of its citizenry to maintain itself and I will give you a revolution
Show you the results of the revolution before the revolution? How would that work? I could show you a democratic workplace, I suppose, and tell you that through revolution all workplaces could be like that.

The point of revolution is to get rid of flaws systems that exist now. The people don't revolt because what they have isn't socialism, but because what they are living under is bad. Socialism is an idea for a direction after the revolution, not the idea causes it to magically spring into existence.

Based and REDpilled

Attached: workers rising up revolution proletariat bourgeoisie capitalism.jpg (856x1200, 732K)

>Show you the results of the revolution before the revolution?
show me the theoretical version of a communist ideology inspired economy that works in non-ideal situations

there's no other timelines though, this is the only reality that could possibly exist, you're the only possible version on yourself. all things are subject to chemical disintegration. physicalism is the ultimate redpill.

Great post
Low IQ post

Fighting the revolution is romantic, but helping accelerate late stage capitalism to its collapse is more realistic.

Happiness and fulfillment are life's greatest achievements

Attached: 1527934518904.jpg (565x407, 119K)

At this point it's just this : do you want New York Jews or Mocквa Jews to rule over your people.
And because of that I'm pretty Vargpilled right now, even if I think he can be very stupid at times.
Fuck being a slave, free and poor all the way.

Attached: Vorg.png (235x215, 9K)

This, fuck everybody else. Now you understand americans

If you have that mentality, it certainly explains the absolute STATE of america

Attached: Sweat pledge.jpg (2048x1724, 355K)

i'm happy, can you say the same?

That's a shitty argument. Submitting to awful bosses and working conditions doesn't sound like self-centeredness to me

Attached: 1535230851587.png (1000x1400, 915K)

They both comes from the same "do it yourself, nobody owes you anything" attitude

Attached: stupid-individualist-america.jpg (500x325, 47K)

And collectivism comes from the same "I want my piece of the cake even though i worked 1/3 as hard as the next guy" attitude

Nobody owes you anything =/= I owe nobody anything

Take what you can, and give nothing back. You sound pretty stupid and bitter, to me

Attached: 1532826594110.png (500x612, 247K)

Why do we die and degenerate this timeline is shit.

The final redpill is that no system built and managed by humans can be good, because humans are too stupid/ignorant/emotional/greedy to be trusted with leading millions of others. Both capitalism and communism are doomed to fail, at least under human rule. The best you can hope for is benevolent AI rule.

Okay? Whatever you say, I'm not trying to defend some "collectivism" spook. The motivation behind socialism though is "I want to stop parasites from growing fat off of other people's work while doing none of their own".

Attached: WQKu0.jpg (512x662, 67K)

The red pill is that marxism is not the route workers should follow

you won't do any of that tho

That type of dog-eat-dog won't end well for anyone.

>capitalists make their money by doing nothing
Lol how do you think they got rich in the first place?

Normal people do it all of the time

Usually by having rich great grandparents who did something. Or ruthlessly stealing ideas, getting lucky, and stepping on others to get to the top.

Nah, that's the anarchist/libcom blue pill.

Good question. Your president for example got rich from being born into it. Inherreted wealth. But I guess that's just a small, small minority of the richest in america, huh?

normal people don't come to this utter shithole

Dog-eat-dog founds our existence. You're living because others are dying. Claiming otherwise is pretentious, arrogant, and incorrect. Wouldn't expect anything more from you, though

Attached: 1533706869805.png (1365x767, 1.23M)

Individualism/collectivim is a false dichotomy

This, too

Attached: 1531944552202.png (854x480, 309K)

Uncle sam takes the majority of inheritance money
Trump is a very small portion of the wealthy who have had a substantial inheritance. He did however make a fortune for himself with the money he inherited. It's not like he didn't do anything. I hate trump btw
I go here to laugh

You think its a good idea to have a dictatorship or a ruling party to build socialism.

I believe in a democratic system of congress that represents everyone and each person to expand their rights and sovreignty a castle and nobility to all, expansion, and beyond, and beyond a king in power everyone.

Every man his own sovereign ruler, in peace and unity of course among those part of our community and fit to be part of our evolutionary future.

If you take away half of a 1 billion $ inheritence that still leaves you with 500 million $. The more money you have, the easier it is to turn it into more money.

by being born in rich families

>He did however make a fortune for himself with the money he inherited.
>It's not like he didn't do anything.
He did tho. He's lost a shitton of the money he's had. It's been calculated he would have had more money now if he'd left all his inherritance in a bank and not done anything with it than if he invested it.

he inherited 120 million, still a lot but he's worth 3.2 billion now

>You think its a good idea to have a dictatorship or a ruling party to build socialism.
Thanks for telling me what I think. That's a nice strawman to hear is me.

Brother they're eventually going to fuck up anime and everything else until there is nothing left. Anime death squads soon brother.

Attached: 1535473081680.png (680x779, 420K)

I'll start panicking when Americans force the original audio to match the dub.

the finn posting itt is a moron

have you SEEN the high guardian spice trailer?