Does your country use based and redpilled nuclear power?

chernobyl was not enough

Yes. We get bonus points for pissing off Austria with it.

We're actually dependant of the Uranium-producing countries, so it's not very different from oil or coal

nice meme africa is still a french colony. You own their money and central banks, you own them basically.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFA_franc

Yeah but they are our dependencies so I say it evens out

Attached: Armenia - Nuclear power station Mezamor.jpg (800x450, 201K)

Yeah, but its really lacking funding nowadays. We should be investing into them so they prpduce more energy and less waste, its by far the cleanest energy source that was developped.

you frogs should stop having so many nulear centrals, its only time before an islamist make one explode. At least build them all in bretagne.

It's way better to be dependent on African uranium than on Russian gas.
At least in this schema we have the military upper hand.

Holy fucking shit

Attached: brainlet__27_.png (610x612, 62K)

Believe it or not but there is a very long term plan to stop using nuclear. It involves replacing nuclear energy only with renewable energy.

>largest proven uranium reserves in the world
>can't use nuclear because ''where could we ever find a place to dump the hazardous waste in this 7.6mil sqkm desert???''
ah yes, very good
we do technically have one, but it's a tiny 20MW thing for research purposes

well we have a really big mushrooms growing in our forests because of nuclear power

Yes, but stupid people are preventing more from being built in favour of unreliable and unprofitable sources of energy.

This.

>even Armenia has a nuclear power plant while we don't

>even Armenia

classic polack
what makes you better than him you nuclearless subhuman?

I'm pretty sure Poland is superior to Armenia in a lot of other fields

Yes

That shit's dangerous

When you actually maintain them it's not that dangerous.
But you can't expect Russians and proto-Russians to be resistant to corruption and public funds appropriation.

Yes

Attached: atucha_790.jpg_525981578.jpg (790x440, 47K)

don't know, don't care

Currently yes, but the greens made sure that this ends and now we are tearing down forrests to gather coal and build Windparks.

The greens got made about the coal, but they actively support the Windparks in the Forrests.

>chernobyl
>could have been avoided by not having idiots run stress tests on an active reactor with backup systems turned off
>fukushima
>forces of nature, could have been avoided by not building reactor in an earthquake prone area

but at least you have an interesting city to explore now. Have you been there?

Enjoy no more free gas once Nord Stream 2 starts

not enough

>research purposes
Suure.
Who are you nuking first?

Selling EPRs
Anyone wants some EPRs?

Wind energy is the worst form of energy

world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/china-nuclear-power.aspx

This is beautiful to read
I literally cry at how smart they are.

We closed another one today...

Yes. I can even say France was (perhaps still is) the leader on this domain. It was popular and somewhat a national pride.

Then Fukushima happened and now it's see as a bad thing. Ecologists wants to close them all.

The fact is, we are one of the developped countries with the smallest carbon footprint, thanks to this.

>no river nor piece of water in sight
Stop it immediately you stupid commie nigger !

Sad!

Not enough. There should be a nuclear reactor on every street corner.

We'd fuck it up and mutate into those monkeys from Planet of the Apes.

H*ngary

We should do the same, too.

>dig a hole
>dump the waste in the hole
It's not exactly rocket science.

But in the end they win, you should consider it.

Yes. Not so long ago nuclear plant in my city launched last generation VVER-1200 V-491

entirety of japan is an earthquake prone area. They just have to keep building them on the coast, so ocean currents would carry radiaton away to america

Attached: 300-tons-radioactive-water-japan.jpg (790x550, 287K)

What fucked Fukushima was the Tsunami, not the Earthquake, it actually withstood the latter.

yeah, a second one is actually being built RN by the russians

Attached: Paksi-atomerőmű1.jpg (1280x851, 832K)

Yes, not that much tho, around 20% of our total energy is produced by nuclear plants

You know this map isn't about radioactivity ?

I was there this January, took a couple of pics of the new sarcophagus and Pripjaty

Attached: IMG_20180127_125246.jpg (2976x3968, 3.42M)

local kindergarten

Attached: IMG_20180127_141425.jpg (2600x3466, 2.46M)

the bumper car track in Pripjaty, still waiting for the grand opening that never came

Attached: IMG_20180127_132955.jpg (3000x2250, 2.33M)

But they have more tourism now than they could ever dream of.

No.

Wut, polaks dont have nuke powerplant? Commies built us one in the 70s. Why not some for Poland. Russkies didnt trust Polaks with nuclear technology?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Żarnowiec_Nuclear_Power_Plant

to the guillotine with you

He's not wrong. Greens really are that dumb.

There are friendly Uranium countries at least like Australia and Canada. Or corruptible ones in Africa.

I wish. We did a referendum years ago but the people decided not to because "Muh nuclear is bad muh" and now we rely on other countries' energy

Greens are afraid it could irradiate the underground rock... I mean 500 m underground, who cares?
Personally I would dump it in a volcano, problem solved.

No. Coal, gas and a tiny bit of hydro.

We have one nuclear power plant

Attached: nek-iz-zraka.jpg (2272x1704, 837K)

how do you even breathe

We got our energy:
>1/3 from coal plants
>1/3 from a nuclear plant
>1/3 from hydropower
Coal and hydropower should be abandoned though, we should build one more nuclear power plant and then slowly transition to solar energy in a span of 50 years.

It's cheaper to ship everything to India.

>hydropower should be abandoned
Why?

Based retard! That is not a map of radiation, that is a map of the tsunami wave amplitude.

But the radioactive material is taken from the ground in the first place

Nuclear power sucks because it'll fuck the earth and animals in the future if things go wrong.

(((research purposes)))

The other sources will fuck shit up by design

No because fucking cunt faggot NIMBYs and subhuman greentards.

>hydropower should be abandoned though
Why? It has literally no downside.

We use hydraulic energy too, on top of Nuclear.

Attached: Yacireta1-e1495463684776.jpg (960x427, 82K)

>It's way better to be dependent on African uranium than on Russian gas.
I don't know man, Russia has dependably delivered gas even during the Cold War. Meanwhile any meme civil war in negro Africa could cut you off your supply.

Wrong, what people are afraid if is that it could irradiate ground water.

A country that doesn't have nuclear reactors is not a country at all

Germany btfo

I wish. People just automatically hate it for whatever reason. I think they hate it because it has irreversible waste and the possibility of meltdowning. But tbqhwyf I think the pro's outweight the cons.

>Meanwhile any meme civil war in negro Africa could cut you off your supply.
That's why we have troops all over the continent.

>environmentalists are anti nuclear power
Why do they do this?

We were this fucking close
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jervis_Bay_Nuclear_Power_Plant_proposal
Fuck McMahon.

Yes, but not enough and may not get more because the (((public))) hears nuclear and thinks of dangerous shit

they also get BTFO by the brainmore mutants using a nuclear weapon
pottery

t. gaylord

Great, so how much does nuclear energy end up costing you?

Low intelligence.
GMOs, nuclear power and coal-seam gas are gonna do more to help the environment than cheap, shit-arse Chinese PV panels that'll be landfill in 15 years.

Nuclear + Hydro are the best options until we can start sapping a large amount of Sun's output from near its surface.

t. ghoul

Hol up you're telling me a country full of autists obsessed with efficiency aren't using the cleanest and most energy efficient method of electricity generation in the world?

Anti-nuclear people sort of remind me of NPCs.

Don't even need that. There is far enough energy coming from the sun directly to earth to sustain humanity growth for thousands of years. Only thing missing is a technology to capture this energy efficiently and cost effectively.