Nazi Germany wasn't at all justified

>Nazi Germany wasn't at all justified
>They needlessly killed Jews, Poles, and Roma when they could've just evicted those ethnic groups, and no one had to die
>They even killed members of their own race needlessly
>Now that it's gone and 2 million Aryan men died needlessly, now Arabs are moving into Germany due to German guilt over genocide
>Hitler was only shit for the people he "loved"
>Destroyed more white genetic material than anything

I can't believe people look at that shit and support it today. It was a such a stupid and evil thing.

Attached: nazi-germany.jpg (998x598, 121K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_crimes_against_the_Polish_nation
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Destroyed more white genetic material than anything
sounds pretty based to me

"Muh racism" isn't even the worst part about the Nazis since at the time the allies were equally as racist and genocidal. The main flaw about them is that they based their whole economy around the military and depended on plundering the wealth of their neighbors. That type of shit is unsustainable long term and guarantees perpetual war and suffering.

I never heard of allied genocide (they did drop atomic bombs on the Japanese, but they would've dropped those same bombs on Germany), but I do agree they were racist.

It's the only answer to real life.

>the allies were equally as racist and genocidal.
No, I don't think any of the other Allies deliberately tried to exterminate several million people at any point during the war.
No strategic bombing is not genocide.

>inb4 someone says Indian famines are deliberate genocides despite any relief effort was impossible due to the world war that was going on at the time

>they could've just evicted those ethnic groups, and no one had to die
Evict them to where exactly? They were taking the entire continent, can't send them elsewhere in Europe...

They could've shipped them to Brazil or forcibly moved them to Palestine or somewhere in Africa/the middle east.

They had connections with Italy to do that.
None of it was necessary. Hitler just didn't Jews, so he had them killed.

That's all he was.

>forcibly removing jews to Palestine
Which side are you on?

Attached: ?.jpg (480x527, 34K)

And don't say it wasn't feasible. They only had to shuffle about 5 million.

20 Million Africans were moved in shitty, small slave ships.

The side of the human species.
Jews just had to be isolated with an evolutionary underclass to control (Arabs), and they could live finely.

Then it'd just be a matter of preventing war as it always is.

>the human species
How do you see the human species in the future?

100% kosher circumcised.

Brown (and it will be beautiful).

shut up kike slave

This

Ideally, the same as it is now.
The races all living apart from one another.

But realistically, a race-war or widespread race-mixing. First world countries are going to run out of space someday, and ethnic enclaves won't be able to sustain their isolation. It'll be Asians on top of Whites on top of Hispanics on top of Blacks. People flowing to where the work is. Hell on earth.

The USA will likely start to be Brazil en masse once this happens. Violence will eventually result from the race-mixing.

Just a terrible existence.
A race-war will be necessary once the world is too populated to prevent that from happening, but not yet.

If it had worked out well, people would admire him today in the same way that Stalin is admired.

Either that or population control.
But I doubt that it'll be effective once a certain number of people is reached.

They would admire the positives of what he did, but they wouldn't admire the needless evils.

Also, modern Russian officials still repress criticism of Stalin.