>Italy should face disciplinary action after “serious non-compliance ” with EU fiscal rules, the European Commission said today.
>The EU’s executive arm made the announcement in a report containing a damning opinion on Italy’s draft budget plans for next year, which include a flat tax and a basic income for the poor.
What's the purpose of the e""""u"""" anyway?
>What's the purpose of the e""""u"""" anyway?
making Greekoids seethe
Seething
pay denbts
no u
pay
Gib
Finally, some good fucking spoils. Picking skin off Greece's bones was barely worth the effort but Italy has over 10 trillions in underutilized wealth, ripe for plundering.
>plundering
So, the e""""u"""" is Germany basically.
the EU is Neo-Francia, Charlemagne's empire reborn, continuing our gallo-germanic tradition of mercilessly dominating and looting the continent.
France is a lesser to Germany though.
based as fuck my Frankish brother
>Frankish
>Brother
To BTFO populist cucks
>implying any of that money goes to france
your big government reliant economy has no place in the new Europe.
>a """"union"""" of """"equals"""" isn't populism
As it should be. The Gallic man exists to serve his Teutonic masters.
Are you German by any chance?
I'd be absolutely fine with Italy making whatever budget they want if they publicly announce that after they go bankrupt in 2023 they won't receive a single cent from the EU and they can go beg the IMF for money
>basic income for the poor
I'll never understand how it's a good idea to incentivise laziness and incompetence, or how it's moral to steal from the productive to give to the parasites.
>proclaim unsustainable socialist populist bullshit
>get elected
>steal as much as you can
>when the economy collapses blame Germany
The productive need a consumer class, don't they now?
The productive wouldn't be productive if they didn't have a consumer class.
that too
So in order for there to be a productive class to steal from, there had to have been a consuming class.
>What's the purpose of the e""""u"""" anyway?
Why the fuck would consumers have to be unemployed?
You can have a job and still be a consumer and the economy will do better.
Purposefully creating a class of non-working people that live off the working people and spend their money for them is like the most retarded thing I've ever heard.
>What's the purpose of the e""""u"""" anyway?
dabbing on m*Doids apparently
>steal from
I said consumer class not merchant class
There can't be full employment. Besides, low paying jobs aren't even worth it anymore. It's just a step above living on welfare and you get taxed for it.
They dab on you too.
We dab on them, something that m*Ds cant afford.
Yeah but why would the productive be productive if the only reason for a productive to be productive is to sustain the consumer class?
Should of won the war, kiddo.
Heh, the EU and all its attendant bullshit were worth it for these posts.
>sustain
a consumer buys a product the producer profits
no you can't. One of the most common argument against you is the fact that you get tons of funding
Thank you, Italy, for taking away from us the burden of being eurocrats' favourite virtue signalling target
I think EU is moving away from the current "bash Eastern Europe" fad and going back to the old, well-tried "exploit South and then call them lazy" classic
Maybe this pause is only temporary. I mean, why not go for both?
Literally any other flag
:^)
That's why welfare is a problem.