Why isn't India as developed as China?

The rich and developed part is capitalist

Other than colonialism the caste system really hinders progress by preventing the brightest and the best from being successful

Yes
Fascist capitalism

You can't fix a brown country without ethnic cleansing

democracy, in china they don't need to go through a gridlocked government that barely works

How did you get past the censors?

>The British tried to keep the Indian people weak
kys

Jow Forums nor 4channel are banned in China

Ununified languages and caste system

>muh caste system

The correct answer is lower IQ.

there were no censors in india. my dad had a temporary teaching job in some state near himalaya where dalai lama lives,it was interesting

I think he was referring to how are you able to post from China

Just by hearing about it I can tell the caste system has had horrible ramifications for Indian society. I swear to god Pajeets are the only ones who will defend that shit to the death.

Chinks are superior asian masterrace
while Indians are shit-brown people who are not islamic retards merely by accident

ummmm by using internet???????

The brits fucked them up.

Based

Your dad is a secret agent

they're both shitholes lol

but you need to pay a whole days wages to afford a vpn
is it really worth it

yes i like talking to international ppls

Not really. There is no way to properly verify the IQ of a entire country.

looks pretty comfy though. china is becoming too isolated and westernized

Easy answer?
A lot of factors.
Colonialial exploitation and post partition famine, chaos aside, the current day reasons boil down to mainly three factors.

1) India opened up it's economy in the mid 90s, around 10-15 years after China did. Meaning China got a pretty solid start on India who was socialist at the time.
2) China's government being authoritarian in nature means that decisions, policies and the like are passed and enforced much easier than in India. For example, after years of playing with the idea of raising FSI/FAR (floor space index or floor area ratio, i.e how many floors/stories a building can have in a given area), the government only increased it by a little. It is still 0.5 -1.7 in most areas. The highest is in some parts of downtown Mumbai where it is between 3-5, if I'm not mistaken (compared to 15 in Hong Kong and 23 in some parts of Manhattan).
3) This is the obvious one, corruption. Most Indian government officials, politicians and bureaucrats are corrupt as fuck and a large portion of taxes and government revenue goes into their own pockets rather than into development. Most development actually takes place during the year preceding election time so the party in power can make it seem like theyve done a lot of help while they were in power.

Due to all of these various reasons, India is still far behind China, at least by 15 years minimum. Things are progressing, albeit slow but it's better than nothing.

Because China liberalized their economy in the 1970s and India liberalized their economy in the 1990s.

And because colonialism was more extensive and brutal in India.

Lynn's and Vanhanen's IQ numbers are bullshit they made up out of thin air and doesn't explain why China was as poor as India in the 1970s before they opened up their markets and liberalized their economy.