Belgium is closer genetically to England than Wales, Scotland and Ireland

>Belgium is closer genetically to England than Wales, Scotland and Ireland
I'm surprised as the rest of you so all I can say is wtf I love Belgium now

Attached: similarity_to_england.png (4592x3196, 1.06M)

also can someone please explain Armenia? Surely there is a reason behind this outlier

All this does is proof the English don’t belong on the British isles

Love you too bro

They are both mongrels

So that's why it's an ugly shithole full of inbred bastards?

wtf we didn't rape you well enough
also
>israel

fuck off scwheini

all a*Glos should be deported to Belgium

who does then?
love you :3
define mongrel? every single human being on this planet is a 'mutt' if you want to get autistic about it
I did think we'd have more in common with you lot to be fair

Certain regions (the south-east) probably have more in common with you and Scandinavia,

Attached: turks.jpg (1200x996, 161K)

Now show brazil

this colour scheme is retarded considering it's pretty low all around
and no one would claim Europe has no relation to turks but it's still too low to matter that much

>y-dna haploshits

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1280x720, 114K)

>81 to Spain
Can you plz don't

Armenia is also r1a

what's the problem my brother, we are one and the same Pedro, let's make peace
*offers you an olive branch*

but why though? how did this happen?

>Y-DNA
this is basically meaningless

>Israel
>100% match

Wait a fucking second cowboy

It's not the be all and end all but the data still means something and it generally seems accurate from what you'd expect
Didn't notice that at first hahaha

>south-east
you mean the north east coast, yeah?

yorkshire was the danelaw stronghold

>Belgium is closer genetically to England than Wales, Scotland and Ireland
>JUST Y-DNA

HAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>It's not the be all and end all but the data still means something
no, it really doesn't.

And of course from al andalusia

>Israel

Crusaders

Why not consider sudan etiopia kenya and nigeria?

Yorkshire too. The south-east had the heaviest Germanic settlement though.

Attached: anglo_saxon_migration_by_arminius1871-d85tqiw.jpg (948x842, 158K)

>no difference between anglos and jews
who would have guessed?

our Celts came from iberia

can't comment on the anglosaxon settlement as i'm not too versed in it, can tell you though that york has the highest paternal norse ancestry in england (only beat by orkney & shetlands) and yorkshire has the highest overall germanic ancestry in the uk as a whole

excuse me but yorkshiremen are 100% pure brythonic

Attached: 1447348668792.jpg (1024x724, 155K)

This map is wrong, we share 0% DNA with anglo monkeys

Attached: ire-eng-scot-wales.jpg (1547x856, 1.06M)

>west yorkshire
try reading your own image mate, west yorkshire is distinct from the north, east, south due to its history as the celtic kingdom of elmet

the west riding is the only riding that matters

Attached: 1524063744845.jpg (1600x1204, 641K)

listen pal we all know its the north riding

What website did you use for this?

britishIsraelites.com properly

*waves from Liverpool*

the north riding is only relevant thanks to york, which itself is only relevant because of its history and population-wise is basically just a large town

west riding has the 2nd, 3rd and 4th largest cities in england

Y-DNA ≠ genotype

Y-DNA is just an infinitesimal part of your admixture. There are African Americans who carry the most common haplogroup in Britain, that does mean they are Britons or closely related to them.

based celtic bull

It just means Belgium has a lot of R1b.

>tfw I have a small bit of br*tish ancestry thanks to the sp*nish

Attached: rope.jpg (480x479, 20K)