Middle eastern ( iranian, Afghani )

Middle eastern ( iranian, Afghani )

+ aborigines who did reached to Australian content but stayed in indian territory at the ice age

= indian

Attached: 1543027707250.jpg (1031x336, 262K)

Other urls found in this thread:

iran-daily.com/News/112614.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Exactly

So? This thread seems to imply that middle easterners are superior when opposite is true, indians of largely aboriginal heritage (dravidians) are far wealthier than afghanistan, pakisytan and north india.

>So? This thread seems to imply that middle easterners are superior

No people are superior, indians are just equally inferior to all races.

This

so if indians are inferior to all races, logically speaking india should be the poorest nation on planet with least income growth, when in reality neither are true. In fact 'abo' parts of india have actually produced several geniuses (such as c v raman and ramanujam) and even isro is dominated by dravidians. Or is logic too much to expect from a abo shitposter?

So why are the best states in India like Kerala made up of Dravidians like me ?
Also that guy in the pic is from north India

Attached: EF9997E3-9F4D-4172-804D-C58DA2D2597F.jpg (3264x2448, 1.72M)

India is poor as fuck, you retard. You have 1.8 billion people and are ranked 112th on income per capita. Imagine being this delusional.

It seems a new wave of shitposting is needed to keep the deluded 'Superpooper 2020' posters off Jow Forums again.

>indians wealthier than anybody
lmao

>1.8 billion
its 1.3 billion
>india is poor as fuck
did i deny that in my post?
>per capita rank is 112th
there are about 190 countries in the world, the rank you yourself posted logically defeats your previous argument, boy you aussies sure are dumb as fuck. No reply POO since that's the only thing cumskins are capable of.

India, especially south India is significantly welathier than 'aucasoid' pakistan and afghanistan which have, as per Jow Forums, more 'aryan' blood. This can be verified by any organization. In fact even in western world, indians are usually far wealthier than paki diaspora despite both living in same conditions. Now back to sucking zhangs cock leaf.

Ancient Ancestral South Asians were not the exact same people as modern Australian Aboriginals. Rather they were both descended from the same initial wave of migration into South/Southeast Asia out of Africa.

Attached: IMG_8173.png (442x768, 75K)

KEK

POO

>POO is the only thing cumskins are capable of saying when they lose argument
>cumskins replies with POO
pottery

Cumskin is a weak epithet because European skin is not really pearly white like a gob of cum. "Pigskin", "white pig", or "cracker" would work better.

Dioderant should be mandatory for your race. I swear anywhere i go the stinkiest and most annoying are indians. I bullied so many of your kind at international school.

>dioderant
fucking hell mate, you've absolutely butchered that

>indian calling someone dumb

Mate, you work call center jobs for us and clean our slushie machines.

>tranny bullying anyone
lmao. your just angry that your nation is nothing more than a giant porn studio for white males.

>muh call center jobs
Even in IT, majority work in coding or other backend services. Barely anyone works in call centers anymore bruce.

Coding what? html? javascript? I wouldn't hire a poonigger to operate a printer, let alone a computer. You're people are considered as jokes here, your education trash and your respect in IT, let alone any sector is non-existent. In Australia, poos aren't considered for IT jobs any more because your people have extremely terrible reputations.

lol i keep hearing how indians are 'terrible' yet your we keep dominating IT sector in pretty much any anglo nation (and increasingly even non anglo nations). It seems apart from neet virgins, no one has an issue with us given our peaceful nature.

>bullied so many of your kind at international school.
>that flag
>slant eyes bullying anything
TOP LMAO

It's funny that both white racists and indian leftists have predicted that the Indian tech industry will collapse soon for almost two decades. Meanwhile Indian tech companies are earning billions of dollars more by every passing year.

LOL even the stereotypical Indian Java developer in Tier 2 Indian cities like Coimbatore are earning more than many white Eastern Europeans here on Jow Forums.

< eastern europeans
< humans

try again friendo

That is not quite accurate. Here is how it actually went: There were IHG people who were more or less isolated in India since about 45,000 years ago (they are closely related to Andaman islanders and Austronesians). Then about 8,000 years ago Caucasus hunter-gatherers/Zagros farmers entered the subcontinent. These CHG people were not really middle eastern since the middle eastern populations primarily have ENF (near-eastern neolithic farmers) DNA, and, the CHG and the ENF populations aren't that close to one another. Now a days, CHG peaks in certain Iranic, Afghan and North Caucasus populations, so they were wet/central Asians (the BMAC could have clustered close to generic ancient CHG populations for example).. After that, about 3,500 ago the Aryans entered south Asia, and these Aryans were primarily a combination of CHG + EHG (eastern European hunter gatherers). So when the Aryans mixed with the CHG Indus valley upper class, the resulting new generation of the upper classes were mostly CHG + some EHG (the equivalent to a day combo of North Caucasian + some eastern/northern European components). This was something like ~3,000 years ago. Ever since then different populations groups having different proportions of CHG, EHG, and IHG ancestry have mixed and muttified to a horrifying level to give a final product of an Indian population where most people primarily have IHG based ancestry as their primary autosomal component.

So, there is no legitimate middle eastern component in this due to the lack of ENF populations involved.

Standard abo 'jeets are the lowest of the low, simple as that. DO not cite outliers as an argument contrary to this, and certainly do not cling on to the Tamil Brahmins who you vilify most of the time for having some west Eurasian blood.

>bruce.
More like Zhang or Mohammad Abdul Khan.

So much racism on this board, how sad.

>yet your we keep dominating IT sector in pretty much any anglo nation

LMAO, come here dude, you will see the domination... at 7-11.

hmmm

Attached: 1497176250123.png (1578x1738, 715K)

You're literally a neet incel that's on this board and Jow Forums 24/7, you aren't making a good case for your kin, gupta.

You're full of shit. Indians are definitely known for being prevalent in the IT and engineering industries here. It's mostly the newer immigrants that can't get jobs that work at places like 7/11 - moreover its not just Indians, I also see a lot of Pakis and Arabs working there.

>incel
ahh, a word used so often by soyboy incels in denial.

What do you know? You don't even go outside, you deluded ugly cunt.

who the fuck are you talking about? there a ton of Indians in aus, take for example the 2 above me

I'm not indian (thank god).

Haha sounds like I hit a raw nerve, faggot. You're an effeminate, pathetic weak male feminist who thinks defending m'ladies will get him laid. Incel in denial..

That's not what I was talking about. I was talking about the job industries. I highly doubt you are a proper aussie as well, the average aussie at the most may dislike indians and make racist jokes about them, but considering I see you in many threads, bringing up the same jokes about indians I can safely guess you are a Paki.

what? im Indian wtf is going on here?

Now compare that to a Danish or Swedish HDI value and you will quickly notice the difference between abos and Aryans.

Hello rajesh

Fuck, I was referring to the other guy. Thought you were the same person. Anyway, as I said I'm guessing he is a Paki. Other races may dislike Indians but none are as obsessed to the degree that Pakistanis are.

Mate, I am not the one sporting a haircut that screams rapist Gupta straight out of the 70s. You don't hit nerves, you take the hits cause you're a virgin. No one here is a feminist unless you describe feminists as someone that laughs at Indians attempts to get laid on facebook.

>the average aussie at the most may dislike indians and make racist jokes about them,

Why do braindead indian NEETs type shit? This is proof you are clueless and a NEET, anyone who has worked with an Indian even once hates the fuck out of them. They're scum.

If it's developed why are you in Australia

to ruin white lives

Attached: KARA_BOĞA_pepe.jpg (999x963, 75K)

Tamil brahmins are barely 2% of the population, they are not the reason Tamil nadu is prosperous though I greatly admire their contributions to tamil culture. It's not just south india actually, even maharashtra is much more prosperous than the more 'aryan' states. Look my basic point is that the general idea (caucasian/fair skin = rich and good) does not apply to indian subcontinent. If it did then the iranic parts of the subcontinent (namely afghanistan + khyber + balochistan) would be the richest parts but that is not true. Whereas a state like tamil nadu with very high component of 'abo' genes is quite wealthy and has plenty of architectural marvels. I genuinely cannot name even a single architectural marvel of afghanistan. The only thing they had was bamiyan and even that they destroyed.

Cause India wont pay him for being a NEET.

Only life you are ruining is your own LMAO

>Only life you are ruining is your own LMAO

Attached: soyboy displeased face.png (219x230, 6K)

Lol,this what a fucking stupid hahah

Your thread on why you are a virgin NEET loser:

such projection. Cunt, you are a virgin and the literal definition of an incel. Go get cancer. It's literally only male feminist virgin faggots that use "incel" as an insult.

based, Kerala has a communist government

>Cause India wont pay him for being a NEET.
The Indians on Jow Forums are not NEETs. If they were NEETs they wouldn't be able to afford an Internet connection.

Most of them posting under foreign flags are probably richer than you and will probably take you future wife away from you.

Yes even the dark-skinned South Indians in the West are more successful than you hateful racist NEETs.

Attached: 3.jpg (612x903, 179K)

>there is only one Indian that lives in aus
top kekels m9

Attached: 2.jpg (615x960, 167K)

>tfw going to unimelb for postgrad soon
>will earn 100k/year after a couple years
>while incels on Jow Forums will keep crying about Indians

Attached: images.jpg (620x349, 27K)

Stop pretending you are Aussie, Muhammad.

I actually think it's sad that they're getting Danish wives instead of breeding a very succesful community of 2nd generation Indians in Denmark.

Attached: 1.jpg (895x960, 189K)

Based Mallu Christian. One of the funniest people I know. He deserves his hot Danish wife. I hope this pic of him with his wife is making you racist NEETs angry.

>n-no you're the incel n-not me bludy basterd *bobs head*

We done here, ganesh? Your insults are as weak as your skinnyfat body that you feel the need to keep posting on this board.

Attached: 1280727969259.jpg (250x250, 19K)

dis nigga kinda dark skinned for a mallu christian

Well, the north is barely Aryan as well. I could go on a long ass lecture about how modern day Indians are barely 30% Yamna at best, but no, let us take a different approach.

The reason why Afghanistan and other central-asianstans are so messed up is because of nomadic and eventually Islamic influences. Look at how those regions did back in the classical ages. They used to be cultural centers for Indian learning and arts. Look at where your Hindu culture, thought and philosophy came from. Did it come from natives or did it come from people further north and/or south Indian upper castes with more steppe and CHG admixture than their non-upper caste counterparts.

Now as for the Aryan question- look at another Aryan nation- Iran. They are certainly much more Aryan than almost any place in South Asia (with a few small exceptions) and the average Iranian is doing much better than the average Indian in spite of all the international sanctions against them and the presence of many international trade agreements to help India. The reason why "Aryan" parts of India do not do well is simply because they aren't very Aryan to begin with.

>>n-no you're the incel n-not me bludy basterd *bobs head*
It's funny because as I said, incels in denial are mostly the ones who use incel as an insult. It's ok though mate, keep coping by larping on Jow Forums. As for my insults. considering how assblasted just calling you a soyboy got you they clearly work, probably because they are based on reality.

>the presence of many international trade agreements to help India
lol no such thing

yea but the average person Kerala or goa for example is living better than the Iranian and they are in south India

So how come India suddenly surged in the 90s on an economic level? Before that point you were nowhere to be seen on the global economic stage, and then eventually a bunch of multinational companies began moving to India for cheap labour, thus driving up the economy of India. I haven't heard of a single relevant state (other than China) who has strained relations with India, and even with China's case the relations are diplomatically and politically strained, not economically (seeing as how China is India's biggest source of economic imports).

I don't think Iran is doing significantly better than South India. Thousands of Iranian students are studying in India:

iran-daily.com/News/112614.html

Brah, you literally post pics of yourself on here, you literally complain about being an incel, this isn't a case of projection, I am stating things you have said yourself on Jow Forums. Who's coping? You have admitted to being: a virgin, fat, ugly, unemployed.

inb4 'that's not me'. You're the only one autistic enough to post the same pic of your hand and dumb shit about being some dravidian master race, you autistic freak.

you fucking retard you are getting people confused, i was arguing with you a bit ago and now you are arguing withe the other guy

Yeah, nice cope schizo, thread count didn't change when you decided to actually format your posts. You crafty little shitskin rodent.

>I don't think Iran is doing significantly better than South India.

Kerala's HDI is at 0.784 and GDP per capita is at $2,300. And this is supposed to be one of the best parts of India.

Iran's overall HDI is 0.798 (about 0.83 for the "best" regions) and the national GDP per capita is $5,383.

Clearly, Iran is doing (economically) measurably better than even the best parts of India. But of course, the same cannot be said about political rights.

Because unfortunately India had anti-Western socialist governments between 1947 and 1991. Between the 1970s and 1990s it was actually China that had good relations with the West while India was firmly in the pro-USSR camp.

China liberalized and opened up their economy for Western investors and companies in the 1970s. India only did that much later and slower between the years 1991-2007.

LMAO fuckin what Mohammed? why dont you understand there is more than one Indian here, this guy aint me

Indians come here to work as menial laborers. Do not compare us to them in any way or I shall smack your bottom firmly at your earliest convienience.

You're a schizo freak that needs to take his pills. Enjoy dying alone from erotic asphyxation you creepy little virgin.

>Mohammed triggered

Yeah I know that India will do better and all (never claimed that it won't), but the point about India being on (economically) good terms with most if not all relevant states still stands.

Are you retarded? That's a different poster you dumb faggot. There's fucking multiple Indian posters you moron. You're a Paki faggot who tries to make himself feel better by pretending he is an Aussie. Cunt, you guys get mistaken for Indians all the time here.

Kek, almost a guarantee that he is a Paki. Mohammed likes to make himself feel better by pretending that he isn't a virgin and is a full aussie on Jow Forums. What a gigantic faggot.

>literally a minute apart

LMFAO schizo going all out on his samefaggotry. Someone call his mum before he starts throwing nuggets at the screen.

Not a single holy city for hindus nor a single powerful hindu empire emerged from modern day af-pak region. So if these regions are where vedic culture come from, then why are almost all important vedic cities (like kashi, prayag, haridwar etc.) located in the gangetic heartland? Fact of the matter is that vedic civilization is essentially gangetic based, almost all great hindu empires (like mauryans, guptas, palas etc.) came from gangetic plains. After islamic invasions, great hindu empires (like vijayanagar and maratha) came from deccan and south regions. Modern day pakis and afghans love to 'we-wuz' claiming they come from prestigious lineage, when in reality their ancestors were nothing more than tribals and pastorals.

Coming to your second point, Iran remained welathy because it was not de-industrialized like India. It did not see large erosion of wealth like India saw. Given the current growth rates, India will soon overtake Iran in next 20-25 years despite having many many more people and being far more diverse.

you're fucking retarded and very low IQ

exactly, based canadabro BTFOing low IQs

Shut the fuck up Paki. You wish you lived in Kerala.

why would i wish to live in a poor state? kek

> 2 people can't be posting on the same thread at the same time

Just one of the many problems that come with inbreeding. Dumb faggots like yourself end up being born. I hope you get deported to Pakistan and get torn to pieces by a suicide bomb there.

The Vedic culture certainly came from modern day Central Asia, there is absolutely no academic opposition to the claim. Modern day holy Hindu cities correspond to the Puranic and not to the Vedic cultures.

Also, the only reason for India overtaking Iran (if it does so at all) in terms of HDI and GDP per capita would be because it is more or less in line with every relevant and powerful state today and has seen big multinational companies move to India simply for cheap labour.

Seriously, look up India's HDI and GDP per capita average, its pathetic even when compared to the worse off parts of Iran. How the fuck do you go from a great power from the Maurya-Gupta ages to being a laughing stock?

> Yamnaya
> Aryan

Yeah... No buddy.

Aryan = Yamnaya + IVC

By Aryan I mean the population responsible for vedic civilization

except Iran is a literal shithole right now? It has a highly leveraged economy with defunct growth and no scope in the future

The US is going to choke it to death until it plays nice in the middle east. It's located in a perpetual warzone with a demographic that most of the Islamic world hates.

India has a lower GDP per capita due to its population and a few certain states. The parts of India where most urban people live are almost 3x the GDP per capita of Iran and much higher in HDI (compared to Tehran, best part of iran)

India is also growing at 8% + per year which is insane given the size of our economy

seriously you are not that huge jaw guy who u trying to fool?he doesn't type like this at all

Well the IVC migrants were very close to CHG people and the Yamna people themselves were almost half CHG, so its close enough I guess. Speaking of which, wasn't the (political) Vedic culture started by 2 kings? The Trtsu-Bharata alliance was it? I forgot which one of them was the steppe migrant.

check the tripfag you dumbass,

why? i cannot type serious things? i always gotta troll? lmao fuck off

>Vedic culture comes from central asia

If true then why doesn't anyone there speak sanskrit or a language resembling sanskrit anymore. Are you suggesting vedic culture got wiped out in it's homeland but thrived in India?

>Modern day hindu cities correspond to puranic and not vedic cultures

kashi has been recognized as an important place of learning even in early vedic texts

>How do you go from maurya-gupta to present

Din't I already explain that? We got de-industrialized. Our current growth is because of industrialization since the 90's not because we are allies of any power or have favorable trade agreements. I mean pakistan is more of an ally to both UK and US than india.

Well, Iran is certainly doing a lot better than India on average. The average Iranian national GDP per capita is much higher than that of even Delhi, and in terms of HDI even the rather unfortunate parts of Iran are doing better than almost all parts of India. Not claiming that Iran is not a shithole btw, it is, but it is not nearly as bad as India (on average). And as I said, Iran would be seeing a decent growth like India is had it not been for American intervention, though, personally I'd like to see any growth in Iran happen after an anti-Islamic revolution.

>How the fuck do you go from a great power from the Maurya-Gupta ages to being a laughing stock?

India had a literacy rate of 12% at independence. The fact that India can launch satellites to Mars on tiny budgets today is nothing short of amazing.

Yeah, the South central Asian cultures got wiped out by the Huns, then the Muslim Turks and then the Mongols. Haven't you read up the history of the region?

As far as any South Asian/Indian recovery is concerned, how do you hope to achieve it? Would you plan to reduce the numbers of undesirables (mostly natives with a lot of IHG admixture) or somehow have them overperform beyond their normal limits?

on average yes, largly due to our subhumanly large population and 70 years of socialist protectionist policies

our economy opened up in the late 90s only

definitely but the point is important since the original Aryans were 100% ANI

they created the cline and the vedic age, eventually ANI mixed with ASI (IVC + IHG) and created the modern ANI cline

none of them were steppe migrants, this was middle rigvedic period and the battle of the ten kings

steppe migrants had already mixed hundreds of years ago

>South central asian cultures got wiped out

A change in culture does not necessarily mean change in language. Pre islamic culture is extinct in Iran but they still speak persian language. Language is one aspect that does not change even if culture is replaced. Look at UK, their pre norman culture was heavily replaced and french was spoken by aristocracy for centuries, and yet despite that the language english is still germanic. Sure it has a lot of romance vocabulary, but at its root it is a germanic language. So my question is, has a language resembling sanskrit ever been spoken in central asia?

>As far as any South Asian/Indian recovery is concerned, how do you hope to achieve it?

I don't buy the Jow Forums race and iq theory simply because of how unscientific it is. Look at indians in malaysia, they were largely tamil laborers from lower castes and middle castes yet today make almost as much income as chinese do. Even in singapore most indians are tamils and do almost as well as the chinese, despite the fact that tamil migrants to these places weren't selected for high skills (like modern day migration to US) but menial skills. Even in UK there are studies which show sharp rise in IQ of 3rd gen indians compared to their parents. As long as we provide nutritious food to our people and enact sensible policies, we will recover to our ancient standards.

ANI and ASI are composite and sort of moot terms. Go with the general ancestral components like CHG, IHG, WHG, ENF, EHG .etc instead.

If the IVC were purely ASI then that would mean that they were pure Indian hunter gatherers with no external influence from the CHG populations. However the people near the IVC region today have more CHG than the steppe migrants did (the steppe migrants. The only explanation for this would be for IVC people to have at least some kind of a CHG related component (which is currently suspected to be the Zagros farmers). That alone would mean that the IVC weren't non-west Eurasians.

It's very obvious you're a pajeet