MAKE INDIA BUDDHIST AGAIN.
Even India's flag and crest are Buddhist symbols.
MAKE INDIA BUDDHIST AGAIN
Adam Cook
Other urls found in this thread:
Austin Parker
Hindu >> Buddhism
Christian Taylor
Nah Hindu+Buddhist+local religion syncretism is the patrician way
Brandon Ross
>local religion syncretism
hinduism is there local religion you fucking monkey
Evan Taylor
>local religion syncretism
Biggest possible mistake desu. Aryan Hindu + Aryan Buddhist syncretism is the way to go. No need to force native pajeet fantasies into this.
Michael Nguyen
india wasn't not buddhist
the only reason why buddhist has been so big because hindus can easily accept buddhism
Gavin Mitchell
Are you retarded. India is a Western comcept. Hinduism greafually spread across South Asia and into Southeast Asia. Khmer Hindus worshiped local gods and ancestrial spirits. Tamil Hindus also have local gods and spirits. Balinese Hindus also mix it with thier indigenous religion.
Hinduism is essentially religion stemming from Vedas
Christopher Lopez
Cringe and bluepill
The republic of India is the land of tolerance and co-existence
Matthew Miller
Buddhism came from the most Pajeet region of India.
Caleb Johnson
It was founded by a man more aryan than almost anyone in modern India. Back then, the people who lived in India weren't as mixed, hence the stereotypical 'jeets were normally limited to lower social classes.
Jason Mitchell
nice try mallu , but sikh or buddhism is part of hinduism
Jonathan Lewis
Siddhartha was Nepali aka Chink
Brayden Clark
>India is a Western comcept.
India as a concept originates in Ancient Iran and meant "beyond the Indus river."
Hudson Clark
"india" name is given by them but the concept was/is "bharat". .
nah , he was indic.
Elijah Cook
The concept of only the republic India being India is flawed. India was never one country. It was only under British rule that the closest thing to a unified India came into existence(Mauryans and Mughals never conquered all of India). If you want to think of India as a geographical location like the world thought of it for thousands of years, then everything inside of the sub-continent is India. Meaning all the land between the Indus valley, Bay of Bengal, the Himalayas and the Indian ocean. Meaning the republic of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are what make up modern India.
Pic unrelated, it's just the only map of India I have.
Kevin Wilson
Yet the entire world calls you by the Indus (Al Hind, Hindustan, India, etc...). Only Hindus use Bharat for religious reasons.
Wyatt Garcia
But what was the boundaries of "Bharat".
Did people on the Ganga consider Tamilians to be the same people?
Jonathan Nelson
Nope, the mongoloid populations of Nepal are relatively new and all of Buddhas physical characteristics point towards him being an Indo-Aryan.
Well, the "Bharat" thing comes from the early Vedic age when the Bharat alliance defeats the other Indo-Iranian and Dravidian tribes to establish a new kingdom.
Elijah Nelson
Buddha was a prince and the ruling class of ancient times were DRAVIDIAN BVLLS
Henry Turner
I mean you can pull up any ancient, heck even Buddhist texts that talk about dark skin being evil and inferior, but okay.
In all likelihood, Siddhartha was light-olive skinned and blue eyed (racially and not just linguistically) Indo-aryan chad.
Juan Robinson
He was not Indo-Aryan. He was a Saka aka Scythian, meaning his ancestors likely immigrated AFTER the Indo-Aryans established India.
Indo-Aryans don't have light eyes, Scythians do.
Hudson Martin
Sorry, my bad. Yeah, well if he truly descended from Scythians then wouldn't he also have light hair?
Bentley Brooks
india was always democratic .there was states. and there was indian ness.
Dylan Gonzalez
en.wikipedia.org
Sakas were descended from the Andronovo culture, who were indeed, light-eyed. Pic related explains the situation of the Aryan expansion into India.
Kevin Reed
Cringe. Those states were kingdoms and empire that were ruled by monarchs. And those monarchs were fighting each other and trying to expand their territory and influence. It wasn't democratic. Modern India (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) are democratic. But before that they were not.
Jose Morales
I think that he is talking about the old Vedic kingdoms where the rulers were selected from a small pool of candidates by certain people.
Christian Lee
even England, italy, germany had kingdoms. that does not mean concept of their country is flawed.
you are trying too hard fag.