Who is the most influencal person in history besides Jesus?

love him or hate him
but i would say Adolf Hittler

Attached: 15368492660521.jpg (2121x1375, 3.32M)

Unironically Hitler. The ramifications and aftermath of ww2 caused bigger shifts in attitudes, cultures and political dialoque than ever. Not even touching how much it changed the landscape of warfare to come.

Attached: 20170322_nato-leaders-montgomery-1.jpg (1345x896, 231K)

mohamed was only importand for sand niggers and irelevant on the rest of the world
his legacy is camel piss drinking, peadophilia and non-human horde tactics

But Islam has had a great impact on the world since its Inception

No Mohammed no Islam
No Islam no Crusades, and a whole lot of other things

Alexander the Great

Fucking based.

So has christianity. But in the end both developed differently and impacted different areas of the world. Muslim and christian worlds didn't really collide outside ottoman conguests and the crusades. The question of islam and christianity in contemporary world has only become relevant in the last 60 years.

Aristotle

so did the mongol invasion and the slavs migration but at it's core was the same human horde campaigns that replaced the native population destroying anything in it's path, the only add on muslims had is that they took the human horde phenomen and turned it into non-human horse, the effects where the same if not worse, whole cultures destroyed, technology lost, great damage done to trade routes etc

>redditler
yikes

Its probably Muhammad or that Buddha nigga

or Beatles

i don't get why people bring up the crusades, they were retalatory campaighns and they were sparse in number compared to the raides orchestrated by the muslims,

need i remind you that before the crusades muslims had taken over 3 holy cities and a lot of holy places from the christians?

>they were retalatory campaighns
no they were not
>muslims had taken over 3 holy cities and a lot of holy places from the christians?
Muslims freed semitic lands from roman empire, who corrupted a semitic religion (christianity) to further their colonial power in west asia

he

Attached: 1461190274046.jpg (513x510, 59K)

20 IQ

this guy

Attached: Charlemagne.portrait.jpg (501x650, 54K)

>no they were not
yes they were, those sand niggers pillaged the whole southern border of europe continously long before the crusades were organized

>Muslims freed semitic lands from roman empire, who corrupted a semitic religion (christianity) to further their colonial power in west asia
hahahahah, stacking up coposes :as high as a mountain:was your way of freeing regions hahahaha stop spewing bs

what was his legacy then ms intelectual coackroach?
tour horde started to develop signs of a civilization only after you took over christian cities

he was an inportand figure in the west but thaat was about it, not theat influentian on the grand scheme of things

>yes they were, those sand niggers pillaged the whole southern border of europe continously
nothing wrong with that

Attached: spread of christianity.gif (1130x745, 61K)

compare

Attached: spread of islam.jpg (638x479, 87K)

then admit it and do not pretend that the crusedes were not well deserved you fucking barbarian

Had Mohammed not been born, the Byzantines would've eventually capitulated to the Sassanians.

Had Mohammed not been born, the works of Aristotle would've never seen the light of day.

You honestly seem biased. I don't care if Mohammed or Islam were evil, we're talking about influence here.

what are you trying to say here
that the better religion spreads faster?

this wwas spred by killing all those that did not follow
while
this was spread relativly peaceful in that era

Muhamad is more influential since his actions had direct geopolitcal influence

Romans were literally worse than the Umayyads. At least, the Umayyads kept the local government intact when they annexed regions to avoid chaos and whatnot.

it's funny you should say that, considering Christianity is the biggest religion in the world, thus is it better?

> the Byzantines would've eventually capitulated to the Sassanians.
nope, even you could not beat them if not for those ransacking venetians

>they would've been in the light of day if you did not came

that's bs, they brought new tach better code of law to their regions

the umayds brought death and enslavement

>>they would've been in the light of day if you did not came
What did you mean by this?

>this wwas spred by killing all those that did not follow
Islamic world remained majority christian centuries after islam took over
only after the mongol invasion did arab Christians start mass converting to islam
it's common knowledge really

Attached: 1536705719249.gif (447x328, 959K)

sory i forgot to paste , i was refering to aristotel's papers

dude, they started to convert because they were treated like slaves, and had their life threatened daily

Two out of the four major/powerful churches existing between between 1054 and 1517 were headquartered in Alexandria and Baghdad, two out of three between 451 and 1054.

'Nestorians'/'Assyrians' had an island of political autochthony in the mountains of SE Turkey until the 1830s.

The Nestorian Church was geographically bigger than the Roman Catholic Church during the Crusades. Translation of Greek works into Syriac and then into Arabic, done by Mesopotamian Christians (and wrongly claimed as being by Arab Muslims) was essential to the "Islamic/Arab golden age" of science, and some of those translators were also physicians in the imperial court.

Just saying.

How did my post seem biased?

Attached: 0b5ea79e.png (404x354, 157K)

>had life threatened
>treated like a slave
>endure literal centuries of it
>only mass convert when Islam is severely weakened if not castrated as a political force

dude stop with the taqia, there were continous wars between islamic faction where if the christians were taken prisoners they were given 2 option conversion or beheading

Lenin

name one such war

Attached: 1518752489217.jpg (807x659, 42K)

Surah Al-Fath:
>52:23: They will exchange with one another a cup of wine wherein results no ill speech or commission of sin.
>52:24: There will circulate among them [servant] boys [especially] for them, as if they were pearls well protected.
What did Allah mean by this?

you know getting wine and stuff

Attached: a18ee7e4f4d0b69f914b66d9a96f1479.jpg (473x750, 62K)

Didn't mean to (you) you, sorry.

>Be Egyptian/Syrian christian in Byzantine Egypt/Syria
>Be a supporter of the Miaphsyte view
>Literally get killed in a civil war over a dumb schism because some retards in the Chalcedonian Council think Jesus' divine nature is separate from his human nature

here's your final (you), retard.

It's a book written by some desert madman. What do you think?

How did they manage to conquer Afghanistan? That has historically been extremely difficult.

the ones with when you guys beat the crap out of diferent sects of islam and destroyed their tombs and all, i don't know it by name, it's not that important of a region

i don't thing he lived that long to be one but stalin could be a viable proponent

Is it true that the virgins in heaven are described as white skinned and that this makes the darker muslim wome quite angry?

52:20: They will be reclining on thrones lined up, and We will marry them to fair women with large beautiful eyes.

this applies to 2 historical cases
the ottoman ransacking of Hussein's tomb in 16th century, and the wahabbi ransacking of hussein's tomb in 18th century
Christians were not involved in neither

nietzsche

Arabs refer to themselves as white skinned, and to europeans sometimes as yellow (blond) or red (rosy faces you have)

some old pages of the quoran discovered by some german in an old mosque said in that paragraph that they willl be given 72 grapes no a thing about virgins

are you sure? because they always knew that very pale slavs existed so they would know what light skinned is

i do not know the names of the wars, when you fagots did not act like locust you butchered eachother quite freqently ,

Arabs historically referred to themselves as fair/white-skinned and to more central/northern europeans as "Red"-skinned.

This is very evident in Ahmed ibn Fadlan's account of the Volga Rus/Vikings in which he called them the equivalent of "Ruddy-skinned".

look it up, plenty of old arab writings in that era

el peruARIO

i can understand the red skin for europeans
but how tf do you come to the conclusion that yellow brown to dark brown skin tone is white? do you all have bad eyes?

There is no faggots or feminazis in Islam, so they are greater.
fuck off jesus.

Attached: bucket.jpg (430x241, 48K)

It's funny you say that because apparently bad eyesight is a traditional/historical stereotype for Arabs. The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica says Arab roads are crooked because of their eyesight.l

feminazis exist because of atheism

>It's funny you say that because apparently bad eyesight is a traditional/historical stereotype for Arabs. The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica says Arab roads are crooked because of their eyesight.l

Attached: 1511529891007.png (426x309, 68K)

But Christians lick their asses. Muslims drop them from the cliff.

>Christians
Post-WW2 people who call themselves Christian just because of tradition even though they practically never go to Church != Christians

I can't change your willingness to make low quality posts, but do you mind if I ask why you respond to my post like that? I'm just as willing to give the benefit of the doubt, that perhaps you misunderstood.

What about missionaries who are in places with no church to attend? Clearly church attendance is not the only criterion.

They don't. Only Jews and atheists lick feminist asses

Great trump'll soon slaughter the femi-faggots in California. great again!

>I believe in a book that was made in 1911 in Britain talking about Arabs at a time when the British were justifying colonialism in MENA and Africa by publishing works claiming that other groups of people are simply inferior.

The crooked roads could've been attributed to the fact that in a desert, the terrain barely changes over vast areas. So, if you drove between Riyadh and Mekkah, the terrain around the road barely changes during most of the trip and it only changes when you reach Hejaz which is a bit more mountainous than Najd.

Attached: 1500998614635s.jpg (250x250, 7K)

Fucking mudslimes ruining another thread with their autism

Gavrilo Princip

Attached: Gavrilo_Princip,_prison,_infobox_crop.jpg (1004x1201, 537K)

>Some Finn and a Canadian answer "Mohammed"
>Christcucks seethe and start ramming their keyboards about how Mohammed's influence is only limited to the deserts of Arabia and "sandniggers"

Why do so many europeans and other westerners hold this view that they're superior to posters from other parts of the world?

Attached: 1540945588789s.jpg (125x102, 2K)

>Christcucks seethe and start ramming their keyboards about how Mohammed's influence is only limited to the deserts of Arabia and "sandniggers"
thats true tough

>I believe in a book

Sorry, I stopped reading there. I'm truly sorry, but you're not very convincing in pretending you can't tell the difference between saying a book says something and saying it yourself. Try harder next time.

Moses

The artist that created Pepe.

feelsgoodman.jpg

do non-europeans believe themselves to be human beings?

Attached: 1425292366026.jpg (327x316, 41K)

Hitler only seems incredibly relevant because he is near history. Definitely not nearly among the most influential.

Kanye West

this incel fuccboi

Attached: sir-isaac-newton-wikimedia_commonsjpg.jpg (1026x1200, 152K)

Genghis khan, maybe? If not in historical influence, then by genetic legacy alone.

real answer is pythagoras or aristotle or someone like that

>he's still here

? i'm not OP

The guy who crusified him?

indians sell hittler icecrean
thay people like natzi fasion
and even now decades after he is dead the west still get;s their nuts in a pinch when someone barely mentions the word heil

Charlemagne, Alexander, Caesar, or Constantine probably

It's not Jesus, it's Mohamed. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a dimwit.

Alejando magno, guy imparted hellenic culture to all that he conquered, and inspired every other comander. That guy sent his culture to every corner of the world

Musk will be in 20 more years

the guy with the electronics store and brass balls with lightning as pubes

Well Caesar influenced history a lot