/éire/

>tfw no fluffles dgf

Attached: 04007e876c0b46ccaf970c471c7cf4f9a836b0c5_b.jpg (340x425, 12K)

When is it going to start feeling like Christmas?

Attached: 1545271214101.jpg (679x679, 93K)

Either:

- Jesus didn't exist. This is consistent with the lack of evidence, and he was made up.

- Jesus a man existed and he was the basis of a made up story. Possibly, like say King Arthur, or Robin Hood.

- Jesus was a man, and he was executed, then a story made up afterwards. Possible also, as his followers irked their leader actually got killed.

- Jesus was visited from afar by 3 rich people who then didn't document before during or after, managed to be in Egypt and not (gospels disagree), managed to evade the undocumented child massacre of Herod (who died 10 years different from the census claimed), managed to have his ransacking of the temple undocumented, managed to have large crowds of 5000 fed and this not to be documented, managed to enter Jerusalem with crowds undocumented, managed his execution to be undocumented, managed to have Pilate behave totally different from all recorded evidence and have an undocumented local custom, managed 2 earthquakes to go undocumented, an eclipse go undocumented, zombies managing to walk around Jerusalem undocumented, managed to have 4 different type of resurrections (gospels materially disagree), was actually killed (and not just near death and cut down too early), and managed to walk around without the authorities noticing. None of this was documented and yet significant records from the 5 cultures in and around at the time with plenty of written evidence doesn't mention this one person with the large number of significant events over 30 years to have NO documentation. The probability of this extremely low.

- Jesus story actually happened, and god was going around ensuring none literate got any sniff of it, none literate ever wrote anything and if anything ever got written down he ensured it was destroyed but no other evidence destroyed, to ensure there was no proof Jesus ever existed, because the message was important it was heard but not written down as the god needed the bit of himself he created man to be suffered to resolve a sin of a law he created due to tree he put right next to a woman and a snake he allowed to exist to explicitly make the woman do not what she was told. Now come on, and this god created a universe for this to happen? Extremely unlikely.

I think the most likely situation is either a man existed and made legend or never existed at all and the story of a man then inserted afterwards, a bit like Spiderman inserted New York to make it more believable.

The laughable bit is his gullible are those believe. Most grow up and stop believing in tooth fairies, and Santa Claus and yet don't realise this is a faked made up story?

yikes
yikes mór
sár-yikes

I see the fedoras are out in full force today

I think it's the second or third option. I recall hearing years ago that there was some documentary evidence about there being a real guy called Jesus who claimed to be the son of god at the time, but I wouldn't be sure where to find that. Additionally, I think Christianity wouldn't have gained as much traction if it was all just made up for a book, I feel like there must have been a big guy going around telling everyone he was the messiah and it would have spread from there.

Poor working class feen

*Poor working class fren

Attached: 1537518400190.gif (220x220, 17K)

kys religitard

Attached: kek.jpg (792x612, 93K)

Are you looking forward to Christmas lads ?

Attached: 1545268993777.jpg (640x360, 35K)

Somewhat. For some reason I'm worried that it might not feel magical this year.

Attached: 1512087159200.png (300x300, 81K)

youtube.com/watch?v=AJMd5UiTeys

Yes absolutely. I only have 2 gifts left to get so nearly there 8)

Attached: 1541700244383.jpg (588x345, 32K)

youtube.com/watch?v=JMuzTJdDNxw

youtube.com/watch?v=pIrOAyXIjak

Abortion is now legal, do you think user will be punching his gf in the womb instead of hitting her head off the ground from now on?

Attached: 1523970593906.jpg (800x800, 207K)

Leo we know it's you

If a woman sat on a dog and it went up her arsehole, she could stab it to death, on the grounds that since it's inside her body it must be part of her body and therefore her choice.

Attached: 1505810677107.gif (382x450, 704K)

drinking

Attached: DSC_0015.jpg (4208x2368, 2.66M)

that's a lot of ice. What's the drink?

whiskey

Make the pro-lifers live with an African or Arab immigrant of the opposite gender.

enjoy it, make sure not to drink too much

Never. Once you get beyond a certain age, Christmas stops living up to expectations.

Attached: 1532262389908.jpg (967x1400, 230K)

Based Irish woman

Attached: IMG_20181220_182313.jpg (636x727, 69K)

>No comments allowed on the journal
I'd love to compare the comments on this verdict against the guy who took a judge hostage today.

every woman is insane

Absolutely killing it in Universal Challenge lads

Indeed. It promises to at the very least be a comforting distraction from life for a brief while.

Christmas is one of the few things that still makes me as happy as it always has.

Attached: Warm and fuzzy.jpg (1920x1080, 290K)

>a couple of drones shut down the UK's second busiest airport for the entire day
The entire situation has been reminding me of this scene for some reason: youtu.be/oY-pdk_FWh0

Attached: 1538310427241.png (778x1000, 653K)

it is against the angrylad code to inflict collateral damage

A more reasonable assumption would be that it's a "stress-test" of the airport and airport-derived economy rather than an actual threat. False flag as ever.

Well the authorities have ruled it out as being terrorism-related. And it being a false flag makes no sense because nobody stands to gain anything that couldn't be achieved with a sanctioned stress test.

>nobody stands to gain anything that couldn't be achieved with a sanctioned stress test.
They do though. Nobody except the people initiating it would know that it was coming, therefore it adds more realism.

That's improbable and a bit too tinfoil hat for me. I initially jumped to the conclusion that it might be people with intention to carry out an attack of some sort in the future testing their equipment and the airport defenses. But that seems unlikely now because the longer they perpetuate the disruption, the more they increase the likelihood of not only being caught, but the airport increasing its defences in the future.

Now I just think it's some autist being a cunt.

I doubt it. I'm fairly certain they have jamming/detecting equipment. And they could snipe or AA a drone fairly easily if they actually wanted it gone.

>I'm fairly certain they have jamming/detecting equipment
They don't. Drone jamming equipment is still an emerging technology and as far as I'm aware, only the military has access to it in the UK.

>And they could snipe or AA a drone fairly easily if they actually wanted it gone.
They considered this but were concerned about stray bullets considering that they would be aiming into the sky.

>or AA
>mfw

Attached: 1536211382170.jpg (474x285, 63K)

Suppose someone ascended to a tall, flat rooftop in an area with no other buildings to match its height. Assuming the rooftop is difficult to access and the man covered his tracks in getting up there so as no one would suspect his being there, there were no witnesses, the man had no prior association with the building to warrant it suspicious and he properly anchored his body to the roof to prevent the wind from knocking him down.

If all that's taken into account, then how long would it take before his body is discovered?

My figuring is that any search party would only search the ground areas for the man as they would have no reason to assume his body would be above them. I think the body would eventually be discovered by a drone enthusiast or possibly a passing helicopter. Though helicopters might not fly in the area and it could be months at least for any drone to notice depending on how common they are in the area.

Attached: 1538843689888.png (147x208, 44K)

It's almost definitely just a prank. The only reason I can think of for someone doing it would be a demonstration to show how an entire airport can get shut down by something so minor, but that's a little out there.

The military guard the UK's airports. Hell, London is probably better guarded than the entirety of Ireland.
Stray bullets aren't that big a problem. If it was actually a big enough problem to them they would have shot it down, and even if hitting planes was an issue, after a long enough shut-down they would know that no planes were in their airspace.
AA missiles would also prevent the possibility of hitting something random like an unguided bullet, so long as the airspace is clear.
And there's probably all sorts of anti-drone technology in the works.

The other thing to consider is that it's an "incident" at a UK airport, and not another country, let alone a small, un-paranoid country without all the militarisation they have, like Ireland for example. In the same week there's talk of preparing a militarised response to economic disruption from Brexit...

Bounced the gfs head off the ground again lads

If it's some autist in a basement somewhere, he's risking being murdered or life in prison for no reason.
If no one is arrested for it, is it more reasonable to believe the spooks sat on the runway twiddling their thumbs, or that no one needed to be caught in the first place?

Fucking hell these Project Maths questions are getting out of hand

Attached: 3khrnri.jpg (610x357, 79K)

>The military guard the UK's airports
No they don't. The military had to be called in especially by order of the Minister for Defence to assist in the operation.

>Stray bullets aren't that big a problem.
Stray bullets from a rifle can kill people by accident if fired upwards. It has happened before. It has nothing to do with hitting planes.

>AA missiles would also prevent the possibility of hitting something random like an unguided bullet, so long as the airspace is clear.
Are your really this retarded?

Tall buildings require so much maintenance especially in the ventilation systems which usually come out at the roof that it wouldn't be long.

"Project Maths, Section 1, Question 1: Write a 1000 word essay about how Mathematics makes you feel"

It's just more simple to believe that early Christians did have a leader who was the basis for their sect as opposed to Jesus being made up wholesale. It's similar to how Colm Cille existed but most of the stories about him are bullshit.

>No they don't.
They aren't the ones wandering around with guns and black tacticool armour, but there are contingencies to call them in immediately.
>Stray bullets from a rifle can kill people by accident if fired upwards. It has happened before. It has nothing to do with hitting planes.
Yeah, but I know they would chance it if they really needed the thing gone.
>Are your really this retarded
Do you really think there are no contingencies for removing hostile drones? Do you think their military is as pathetic as ours?

I am the very model of a model of a modern mathematician

Attached: hqdefault-2.jpg (480x360, 14K)

>but there are contingencies to call them in immediately.
Clearly there aren't in the case of a drone being on the runway considering it took them so long to be called on to assist.

>Yeah, but I know they would chance it if they really needed the thing gone.
No, you don't know what at all.

>Do you really think there are no contingencies for removing hostile drones?
Well Galwick airport certainly doesn't.

> Do you think their military is as pathetic as ours?
I literally said in a previous post that the UK military has access to drone jamming tech, which is most likely why they were called in (eventually).

*that

Yes, let's all just take events where rogue flying objects allow the Anglo-American security state to tighten its grip at face value

Does Gatwick airport hiring a hawk to attack drones or getting one of those anti-drone net guns really suggest to you that the UK is tightening its security grip? The most likely legislative result of all this is that the range ban on drones near airports will be extended just as pilots have been campaigning for.

Get the fuck out of here you god damn spaghetti fuckers.

The most likely public outcome.
Expect more funding to be shovelled to BAE or whoever to install anti-drone jamming/AA to all the UK's airports.

Your countrymen are free to deport all the diaspora and those of Irish descent back to Ireland should you wish

>British government funds British industry to develop solution to safety threat at airports
If this were to happen, I'm not seeing how it is an issue.

What if this was a false flag to facilitate that though?

I still don't see how it's a bad thing. The worst possible outcome of your proposed scenario is that drone-jamming tech is commissioned by the British government for installation at British airports.

>false flags aren't bad things

Once the IRA is revived they'll have a lot more difficulty getting airports with the newest method of bombing

>Once the IRA is revived

Attached: 272d3f1985fbb13fd8701390fa2c8723.jpg (640x628, 38K)

>implying the revived IRA won't have the finest Chinese orbital stealth bombers equipped with ICBMs

A false flag that doesn't service a negative purpose is as detrimental as a simple prank.

>the government can lie to you and it's good if it does what the government wants
y i k e s

Just realised that dabbing is over a year old now after seeing the same Vodafone ad as last year with the young fella doing one. Not sure how to feel about this.

Attached: 1541815003130.gif (900x500, 285K)

Dabbing will probably live on as a gesture of smugness.

It will live on as the way I sneeze when I don't have a tissue on hand.

But why throw the other arm up as well? That just seems like a waste of energy.

I don't, but that doesn't stop people from making comparisons.

Oh, you're one of those people that interacts with others, are you?

Attached: 1545061361419.jpg (543x584, 13K)

Is anyone else alarmed by the growing numbers of manlet packs roaming around? Groups of lads used to be composed of normal sized lads with a token manlet. Now it seems that there's 4 or 5 manlets together with a token tall lad. I'm worried they're taking over. I can't help but feel that all my problems socialising are down to society's continuing discrimination against the non-manlets.

No, but it doesn't stop them from interacting with me.

If manlets rise up are they really manlets anymore?
Putting yourself in situations where others will interact you means you're still partly to blame

Maybe Michael D becoming president gave parents the false impression that manlets can live normal lives. Clearly we need deeper manlet pits.

remember that virgin from yesterday who browsed reddit

>using virgin as an insult on Jow Forums
Have we not already gone over this?

no
ive already gone over your mam tho lol

lmao, nice.

GAS THE LANKS, SHIN WAR NOW

5' 7" is the average male height

Male height for a transvestite maybe.

transvestites are girls

What about the other transvestites?

>5' 7"
kek this is me.

Sure doesn't feel that way

Attached: 1458836911681.jpg (852x478, 29K)