Republic or Monarchy?
Republic or Monarchy?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Neither
Monarchy obviously
Monarchy
absolute monarchy
Elective Monarchy
I wonder how the personality of Republican 02 would change from Monarchic 02
SAVOIA WILL RULE ITALY AGAIN
how
r*public is for Moors, remember the Northern Monarchy
en.wikipedia.org
Monarchy
Only republic if it's ethnic exclusive
Federal republic
Autocracy is good but monarchy has too many problems to reimplement.
In Heaven there is monarchy and in hell there is democracy.
Please remember that monrchies are usually rich nations while most of the poor countries are republics
add the portuguese girl
monarchy
King and country.
You dumb fuck both of the flags are wrong, the colors are flipped.
They are right, but since they are waving it, it looks wrong
Monarchy, always and forever.
>implying the guillotine didn't just make monarchy even stronger
Al-ándalus
Based princess is based.
The ideal philosopher king will never exist, I'd prefer a republic
estado novo
Monarchy is anachronistic and all it's supporters fall for it's pretty propaganda of fancy courts.
Monarchy
In heaven there is a monarchy because God is sublime and therefore needs not be checked.
In hell there is a democracy because the masses are flawed and unchecked.
On earth there should be a republic because no man is without sin, therefore every man in a position of power needs to be checked.
The very fact that an American of all people is arguing for monarchy should be enough to get you hanged.
>Inb4 HA SEZ YOU LOL MUH WILLUHM
1. the Netherlands was traditionally a republic until the Britcucks forced a monarch on us as part of the Restoration
2. The Netherlands keeps calling itself a democracy. This means you either support the monarchy (making you a traitor) or want to abolish it (making you a traitor).
based
Republic of course
based
i would rather have a lineage of non-partisan individuals who are literally born and raised for the sole purpose of the burden of leadership rather than some guy who got interested in politics in high school and joined the political party his parents vote for
>Non-partisan
Because they are their own 'party'. The king rules in his own self-interest.
>born and raised for the sole purpose of the burden of leadership
What are you, a behaviorist? There isn't any education the world that will prevent inbred mongrels from having double digit IQs and drooling all over themselves during their 20th seizure that day.
>rather than some guy who got interested in politics in high school
When was he supposed to get interested in politics? Kindergarten?
>and joined the political party his parents vote for
Wait, was he interested in politics or not? You lost me?
[spoiler]Also political parties are cancer and need to be abolished[/spoiler]
anarchy
Monarchy
Royal republic, duh.
Social Republic.
>The very fact that an American of all people is arguing for monarchy should be enough to get you hanged.
I wasn't arguing for monarchy. Just making a statement.
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.
Communist dictatorship
Tengri Theocracy
Do a britain and get a parliament and a monarch
Monarchy
At least a monarch cares if a country is stable for more than 4 years. And what the long term effects of policies actually are.
more republicans than monarchists died under that thing.
based and redpilled
If you mean an elective monarchy among nobles (like pre Habsburg HRE) than I approve
Those are """Monarchies""" where Parliaments control everything
You don't have a monarchy. You have a Republic with a celebrity figurehead
Based
Republic >>> Monarchy
The first one you have the freedom to elect your leaders, and the second one you are under the control of a inbreed family to pretend be descendents of a divine grace. At least if people had a mistake to elect the wrong leader you always have a second chance the next time. A monarchy sound more a dictatorship for me
Syndicalist Communes
kiss princess feet
Wouldn't an enlightened leader be superiour to a string of corrupt and populistic leaders?
Classless world that needs no state.
Such regimes are going down with their leader
The people has the responsability to chose their leaders according with their preferences, if the people just elect for the populist ones then in this case its the people fault. In my point of view monarchies just see for the beneficts for their clan, just see how they spend in their ceremonies and expensive palaces
>tfw we didnt change the flag when we switched to democracy
are we missing out
That is why marxism and not only turned the politician into a proffesion with channeling and boundaries.
I WILL CHIMP OUT AND TOPPLE YOUR WORKING GOVERNMENT BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE A POPULARITY CONTEST BETWEEN TWO BILLIONAIRES WHO 99% HAVE THE SAME POLICIES WHERE A MILLION RETARDS HAVING AN OPINION IS WORTH MORE THAN 999,999 EDUCATED PEOPLE HAVING AN OPINION VOTER TURNOUT 50% ANYWAY WOOT I WILL BOMB YOU BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THIS KIND OF GOVERNMENT
Dictatorship
ANARCHY!
based
Monarchists should be executed in the public square.
Monarchy flag is much more aesthetic tho.
monarchy because the flags are usually better