Prove to me that globalization is bad

Prove to me that globalization is bad
Tip: you can't

Attached: worldmapnoborders.png (4378x2435, 194K)

The endgame of the concept is to make sure every person can be easily sold the same products. Corporations peddle it because it makes their life more convenient; the actual societal effects are of no concern to them.

dream for the 1%

>Prove to me globalization is bad
ok
globalization is bad

Define globalization first.

So some guy in Tanzania who wants to buy jeans is bad.

Every person being the same is a bad thing. The legitimate diversity of the world is what stops information harvesters/context controllers like Google from dominating everything. If everyone was a mutt with no culture, corporations would easily be able to take over that void in their identity with consumer goods.
Also notice how mutt countries like mine end up becoming extremely individualistic (as people see nothing in common with their countrymen) and therefore become greedy and backstabbing as a means to get what they want.

What is this

GOMMUNISM :D

op btfo

anything that kills wh*Tes is good

Attached: 1545364174703.jpg (1242x598, 70K)

No ordinary people want it.

There you go.

BABYLONIA IS EUROPEAN.
LONG LIVE CYPRUS.

I'll be fine with no borders as soon as people can freely leave Earth for other planets.

Cultural diversity won't die user. Look at Japan. You btich about "muh diversity" but colonization was 10000x way more autistic about destroying people's cultures and reshaping it into a modifiable mass that powers can control and extract labor+resources and sell shit too as well as straight up ethnic cleansing and forcing massive amounts of people off land.

>Also notice how mutt countries like mine end up becoming extremely individualistic (as people see nothing in common with their countrymen) and therefore become greedy and backstabbing as a means to get what they want.

That's solely due to your culture.

Yes it will. We didn't have information controlling transnational giants like Google, Facebook, etc. that have pervaded every aspect of life and are unavoidable.

Why do you think that culture arose? You can see South Americans talking about the same thing.

IIRC, the British were determined to let the territories they conquered keep their culture and govern themselves.

You are looking this whole thing from a completely wrong angle. Globalism isn't about people dancing and singing together under a rainbow. Never. It's about the extent and intensity of political control of a definitive entity. Globalism is only and always supposed happen under the terms of a determined group. That's something that you completely fail to understand. Because of the angle from where you are looking at things, your view is distorted.

In their African colonies they sought to manipulate their subjects in various ways. Religion, taxation, land seizures, government policies ( all of these Nit restricted to Africa at all colony wise).

Alteration of family and social structures to be able to sell products better. Swahili women got taxed if they were single. In Congo Belgians enacted laws to try to increase Congolese numbers.

In British Africa blacks had barely any role in administration asides from dead end shit. Most of the people running shot or pushing papers were Europeans and indians (in eastern Africa) and they were pretty adamant of keep the native out.