Japheth is the father of Whites, Indians and Iranians
Ham is the father of Blacks, Canaanites, Egyptians, North Africans, Minoans, Philistines and probably the Sumerians, original Indians, Aborigenes, Amerindians and East Asians
When God confused the language of people in Mesopotamia, that is when humankind spread across the world
Archeology, linguistics and history confirm this, why do you still doubt ?
>Archeology, linguistics and history confirm this, why do you still doubt ? dont think this is true
Josiah Bailey
Lol, it's just a story.
Isaiah Cooper
the book of Genesis states that Greeks, Anatolians, Persians etc all have a common origin
the Bible call them Japhetites, modern linguists call them Indo-Europeans
the Bible confirmed something thousands of years ago before researchers made a link between these peoples in the 1800s
Benjamin Miller
Ham is the ancestor of africans even the one from the Sahara. Shem of arabians and israeli, Japeth of everyone else including those from turkey caucasus and iran
Michael Wright
It is not just a story
The ancient Indians still remembered their father Cush (a son of Ham) as they named a mountain chain after him
they lived in cities built by their brethren Nimrod, the first king on earth
Tyler Ward
Ham also begat descendants that settled in the south of Arabia, that is why Yemenites are seen as blacks
Ethan Hill
but aboriginal australians diverged from other humans before modern indian populations settled boss
Parker Johnson
>Ham is the father of Blacks, Canaanites, Egyptians, North Africans, Minoans, Philistines and probably the Sumerians, original Indians, Aborigenes, Amerindians and East Asians How can he fuck up his descendant genes so bad?
Christian Sullivan
no they didn't
Cooper Watson
ok you got me
Hudson Allen
Why did the Summerians have glue before 4000 BCE?
Christopher Cox
...to repair broken things?
Owen Brown
He was a damn pig.
Daniel Hernandez
What about abo?
Angel Roberts
they didn't
the flood occured in the 3rd millenium BCE, it is during this millenium that they later spread across the land
Hudson Powell
like I said, they descend from Ham, posibly from Cush
Aaron Lopez
>no argument Where did all the water go? If evolution is impossible because of thermodynamics how can a chick develop from an egg? How do you explain radioactive dating based on half lifes dating things to be much older than 6000 years? Especially with sediments unaffected by radiation from the sun?
Kayden Taylor
and modern genetics can tell that this is bullshit due that heavy inbreeding would lead to broken dna in not so many generations in as complex organism as humans and you don't really read about earth being populated by literal tards later in bible.
Ethan Morgan
not at the beginning, we were close to perfection so inbreeding wasn't an issue back then
modern genetics of reliable sources confirm that all of mankind descend from a single human couple
Connor Collins
>Where did all the water go?
prior to the Flood the waters above the expanse shielded out some of the harmful radiation and that, with the waters gone, cosmic radiation genetically harmful to man increased
This may have caused tremendous changes in earth’s surface. The earth’s crust, which is relatively thin and varied in thickness, is stretched over a rather plastic mass thousands of kilometers in diameter
Hence, under the added weight of the water, there was likely a great shifting in the crust. In time new mountains evidently were thrust upward, old mountains rose to new heights, shallow sea basins were deepened, and new shorelines were established, with the result that now about 70 percent of the surface is covered with water
This shifting in the earth’s crust may account for many geologic phenomena, such as the raising of old coastlines to new heights. It has been estimated by some that water pressures alone were equal to “2 tons per square inch,” sufficient to fossilize fauna and flora quickly
Remains of mammoths and rhinoceroses have been found in different parts of the earth. Some of these were found in Siberian cliffs; others were preserved in Siberian and Alaskan ice. In fact, some were found with food undigested in their stomachs or still unchewed in their teeth, indicating that they died suddenly. It is estimated, from the trade in ivory tusks, that bones of tens of thousands of such mammoths have been found. The fossil remains of many other animals, such as lions, tigers, bears, and elk, have been found in common strata, which may indicate that all of these were destroyed simultaneously.
Brandon Sanders
Nice copypasta, you’re totally not shitposting from some creationist blog you found How did the population of the world grow? How does it account for having enough labourers to build the puramids of egypt at their time? How did Emus end up in Australia? The lifespan for DNA is 150,000 years. Why can’t we find intact DNA within dinosaur fossils but we can in found Mammoths?
Alexander Jenkins
Bible also said God made Balaam's ass start talking to him, who cares? Broken clock is right twice a day.
Henry Adams
Takes this to /his/.
Anthony Ross
Do you have any proof that didn't happen?
Kayden Taylor
>How did the population of the world grow?
by breeding and eating healthy
How does it account for having enough labourers to build the puramids of egypt at their time?
the bible doesn't talk about the pyramids nor the early history of Egypt besides that Mizraim (a son of Ham) is their ancestor, but it does talk about slavery so they probably used slaves to build the pyramids
>How did Emus end up in Australia?
the findings of oceanographers indicate that at one time land ridges connected what are now isolated land areas. For example, oceanographic studies indicate that the Mid-Atlantic Ridge may have crossed that ocean above the surface. Possibly there were also other ridges, and animals could have migrated by means of these before such ridges sank below the surface of the ocean
Other oceanographic studies have turned up evidence that once there existed a huge South Pacific continent that took in Australia and many of the South Sea isles
the animals had no difficulty in migrating to these lands.
>The lifespan for DNA is 150,000 years. Why can’t we find intact DNA within dinosaur fossils but we can in found Mammoths?
I don't understand what you are saying
any other questions ?
Jayden Murphy
Burden of proof lies on you. Next.
Lincoln Cooper
Continental sediment and them being composed largely of granite is explained by them emerging from volcanic activity at the bottom of the ocean as so called ‘cratons’ your explanation does not explain the peculiar composition of continents as compared to land under the ocean.
Cooper Brown
the ass didn't talk, it was an angel
Jayden Martin
So a non answer for the first question The second question was a meme question from how a creationist who edited the article on wikipedia for evolution for some reason dedicated an entire section to emus and on the third question you just short circuited. Nice.
Hudson Barnes
Now you're revising your own source when it doesn't suit you. Coward.
John White
He and his descendants were literally cursed by Noah.
Also, anyone who believes this is a retard.
Aiden Jones
another proof of the deluge having happened is that you can find the flood myth in EVERY culture on earth
from the Chinese to the Babylonians and the Mayans to the Africans
they all have recorded the history of the flood because it was a true event
God brought the flood to destroy the wicked humans on earth as well as the Nephilim, who were half-men half-demon
there are similar accounts across the world, like in Greek mythology when Zeus brought the flood to destroy Giants, and so did the Incan god Viracocha
No only Canaan was cursed, he either raped or castrated Noah
Isaac Barnes
all the African cultures have a flood myth
Ian Smith
Because those societies either lived in river valleys that flooded or were in contact with societies like that. Besides the first flood myth is over 6000 years old lmao
Nathaniel Gonzalez
I edited it so it can be read more clearly
stop being paranoid you weirdo
Easton Wilson
Prove it.
Nathaniel Evans
no, the deluge occured in 2370
all these cultures know about the deluge because they have been told by their ancestors Shem, Ham and Japheth
in time they distorted the account, the real version being preserved in the Genesis
Daniel Hernandez
Yeah you gave a non answer. I want the rate of population growth during the ages from having only a few siblings 6000 years ago populate the earth to having enough workers to build the pyramids at the time they were built and this not resulting in the population of today being like fifteen trillion without having some arbitrary slowdown in population growth somewhere in history. Protip you can’t.
Eli Cruz
there is no such thing as perfect, there is at best middle road when it comes to genetics and dna. You can't have elephant with mouse metabolism and vice versa. You can't have high resistances for everything harmful meanwhile having high complex functionality. Also there is this thing called "evolution" that you must have heard of that can quite well tell you why there isn't single human pair as common ancestor.
Alexander Flores
You're larping as a biblical fundamentalist for laughs whilst changing scripture when it becomes impossible for you agree with it. Weak sauce.
Dylan Adams
It is completely arbitrary that you say the genesis version is the real version when older accounts exist(some of which likely inspired the genesis version)
I’m not going to give your desired answer for you. The math is there already: it’s impossible without some completely arbitrary slowdown in population growth. So you’re willing to accept my mathematical conclusion? It doesn’t matter because you’re probably not even a creationist, just a shitposter.
Evan Moore
Those are millions of people whilst hugely diverse cultures between them. Of course you're going to find a story involving flooding somewhere in there. Doesn't mean they share the story, or even have the same story.
Lincoln Diaz
>it’s impossible without some completely arbitrary slowdown in population growth
where's your proof ?
Landon Diaz
they do share the same original story, that broke into different versions
Ian Jackson
Objectively incorrect. We have versions of the Babylonian flood myth from securely dated contexts thousands of years before the Israelites even emerged as a distinct group around the beginning of the Iron Age. It's Babylonian myth, that was almost certainly picked up during the Exile around 500 BCE.
Robert Ramirez
Rationalisation.
If we contradicting stories, Occham's Razor demands that they had alternate origins.
Xavier Gomez
wrong again
the Hebrews started writing the Bible somewhere in the 1500s BCE after their deliverance from Egypt
The Babylonian and Sumerian flood myths were written before, but the Jews inscribed the true event
Justin Myers
So do you think the Jews foresaw the decline and disappearance of Mesopotamian legends, thus giving credence to their own account as having no antecedent? Clearly that still gives them an edge if they have such magical power.
Levi Ross
your point being ?
Levi Bell
Oh there is but I’d like to see you try to calculate the answer(without arbitrary slowdown) first yourself. I’m not going to waste my energy writing it out for a shitposter. So instead of a claim(As I’m unwilling right now to post how it is backed up)see it as a dare. I dare you that you won’t be able to do it. Maybe I’ll post it all later just not now.
Benjamin Harris
>the Hebrews started writing the Bible somewhere in the 1500s BCE after their deliverance from Egypt
Wrong. They started writing it around 300 BCE, drawing on a oral tradition going back much earlier. The Israelites simply didn't exist before 1000 BCE, in Egypt or elsewhere. They're newcomers, really.
Connor Martin
Yeah, it's almost like they thought they were God's chosen people, or something.
Gabriel Ross
what about us?
Sebastian Williams
You are wrong.
Hunter Anderson
Wrong again
the Hebrews existed as far as Abraham who was born in 2018 BCE in the Sumerian city of Ur
Historians confirm that the Amurru was Syria invaded Mesopotamia around this time
Abraham probably spoke a variant of the Aramean-Amurru tongue which gradualy became the dialect known as Hebrew
Moses started writting the Torah in the desert on the way to Canaan
After their deliverance from the Exile after -539, the Sopherim (Jewish scribes) began recording Moses's writting, which is what you are refering to
Hunter Brown
hey what about me where do my people come from
Bentley Evans
The last unknown son Mapu
Camden Garcia
nope, flood myths can be found in several African tribes as I have just explained to you several times
My personal theory is that native Americans are Canaanite explorers that migrated from Palestine
Remember, modern linguists classify Canaanites as Semites because it's the language they spoke, however this may have been because of Aramean influence (they also adopted their religion)
Therefore, we don't know what the original Canaanite language sounded like, so the Mesoamericans probably are the remnants of these Canaanites
Plus there are similarities in their customs, as both were known for their violent society, worship of agriculture gods, cannibalism, human sacrifice etc
Aaron Evans
Even if that were all true, that doesn't make Abraham an Israelite. If anything, it sounds like the Israelites were co-opting a Mesopotamian figure as their supposed ancestor, just like they co-opted Babylonian flood myths.
Kevin Stewart
>flood myths can be found in several African tribes as I have just explained to you several times
You've gone from "all" to "several". Which is it? Do they all have a flood myth? Or is it just a few of them? Make up your mind.
Julian Wilson
cmon, you just made that up on the spot i rather believe that God just said "and the left overs get to go here" which makes way more sense than trying to create convoluted canonicity to try and justify the presence of people whose existance wasnt known when the religion was being made
better that way dont you think? or if you really want us to be descendants of noah wouldnt it be more reasonable if it was one of those that went to asia? since from asia you can go to america from the bering strait
Daniel Brown
I didn't say Abraham wasn't an Israelite, Israelites are descendants of Jacob who was Abraham's grandson
they later were reduced to slavery in Egypt
the Egyptians did not record their shameful humilation when God brought the plagues to them, that is why they invented the "hyksos" meme to try and cover it
Nathaniel Fisher
It is also possible that the Canaanites that came to America came from Asia, yes
I do actually hold that the East Asians are also Canaanites
Thank you for correcting me
Carter Sullivan
>french education
Matthew Ortiz
So then why are you bringing up Abraham as if that disproves my point about ths Israelites emerging circa 1000BCE if Abraham wasn't an Israelite?
Non sequitur.
Ian Young
>East Asians are also Canaanites ah thank you for saying so, now i can leave this thread knowing full well i am not gonna loose anything important, from no on
You're changing your mind. Are you just plucking numbers out the air?
Jayden Flores
Please insert a space before your question marks as a matter of intercultural courtesy.
Asher Scott
I did not change my mind at any moment
Here is a timeline for you:
- (2370) the Deluge - Nimrod builds the cities of Akkad, Kalneh, Uruk, Babylon and Nineveh and establishes his kingdom - God confuses the languages of mankind - People start to spread across the planet, they are separated into several groups - Advanced civilizations sprout near river valleys: Sumerian, Egyptians and Harappan city-states - At some point Upper and Lower Egypt are united as a single state - a Semite named Sargon overthrows the powerful Sumerians and establishes his domination in the Near East and Akkadian language becomes the international language of the region - as the Akkadian empire weakens, the Gutians of unknown origin overthrow Sargon's dynasty and rule Mesopotamia for some time, only to be overthrown in their turn by the Sumerians who establish the 3rd Dynasty of Ur - Amurru tribes from Syria and Elamites from Iran settle into Mesopotamia and weaken the Sumerian control - (2018) Birth of Abraham the Amurru in Ur - Hammurabi seizes control over Mesopotamia and makes Babylon his capital - (1943) Abraham makes a covenant with God, thus making his future descendants the Hebrews his chosen people then settles into Palestine - Kassites overthrow Hammurabi's dynasty and take control of the Babylonian empire, while Egypt exerts dominance over Palestine and Syria - (1750) the Hebrew Joseph becomes the second most powerful person in Egypt after the Pharaoh. A famine in Palestine forces the Hebrews to settle into Egypt, where they are then reduced to slavery - (1513) Pharaoh lets the Hebrews go and they begin their exodus into the promised land - Moses begins to write the Bible
Tyler Kelly
Shan't be reading this.
Ayden Rodriguez
Although, I can tell you straight off we have accouts of the Artahasis BEFORE your chosen flood date, so suck it.
Jason Mitchell
>britbong asks a question >I answer >I am not interested
the absolute state of this board
Hudson Johnson
>Nimrod builds the cities of Akkad, Kalneh, Uruk, Babylon and Nineveh and establishes his kingdom This is just embarrrasing.
Benjamin Stewart
the datings of artahasis are wrong
David Davis
>Genesis 10:8
>Cush became father to Nimʹrod. He was the first to become a mighty one on the earth. He became a mighty hunter in opposition to Jehovah. That is why there is a saying: “Just like Nimʹrod, a mighty hunter in opposition to Jehovah.” The beginning of his kingdom was Baʹbel, Eʹrech, Acʹcad, and Calʹneh, in the land of Shiʹnar. From that land he went into As·syrʹi·a and built Ninʹe·veh, Re·hoʹboth-Ir, Caʹlah, and Reʹsen, between Ninʹe·veh and Caʹlah: This is the great city.
Josiah Turner
Nah, they're not.
Matthew Roberts
You want rigorous discussion, go to /his/.
Nathan Howard
oh so the noah story is just plagiarism... Got ya
Colton Jones
Popular Science (November 1979, p. 81) reports that physicist Robert Gentry “believes that all of the dates determined by radioactive decay may be off—not only by a few years, but by orders of magnitude.” The article points out that his findings would lead to the conclusion that “man, instead of having walked the earth for 3.6 million years, may have been around for only a few thousand.”