Do you support the pan-Slavic union?

He is right though. Slavs can be treated as an ethnolinguistic group but only if you exclude the south.

Estonia isnt slavic.

the V4 should be a separate union or it wouldn't work out

>kosovo is separate from serbia
>yet in the slavic union
what the fuck

every times a russian wants to write that the south slavs aren't real slavs, he must write that thought with south slavic letters

Não, morre mouro de merda

you are spanish not slav

Meh, calm down.
There's no real slavs. Everyone has been mixed with local population in the place where they settled.

They fucking took Istanbul
Epic

Excuse me, but we're finnic BVLLS

>Baltics
>Kosovo
>Turkey

Attached: tumblr_inline_nt0vfexkpK1spsojg_500.jpg (500x495, 46K)

>500 hundred years of telling everyone we're not slavs
>"BAlTiCS shOUlD JoIN tHE paNslAVic UNioN"
oh for fucks sake...

Slavs are not real. It is a meme. No way that wast area previously occupied by scythians, sarmatians, dacians, eastern goths, marcomanni, suebi and many other would turn slavic in under three centuries, considering slavs, unlike literary every single other ethnicity, have no ancient history and emerged out of thin air in 6th century. It’s just that people east of Danube decided to speak trade pindig to play a joke on "them Romans and Franks" and it went too far.

if you give back german and finnish lands, then we're ok

Attached: 1487976598416.jpg (530x749, 96K)

no

lol you're saying that slavic languages is joke that got way out of hand?
their designation is a joke, too, as the word "slave" in most western languages signify slavery
Slavics are descendants of slaves that speak a made up language, hilarious!

Attached: Sigrid16.jpg (1600x1065, 370K)

All Slavs mestizos. You're just a fool. You do not know the history of your country and your people.
кaкoгo pyccкoгo ни пocкpeби - oбнapyжишь пoд ним тaтapинa(c)

>south slavic letters
Except they're not. You just took the Greek alphabet and added some Glagolitic and Jewish letters to it. It's not more creative than what Peter I did in 1708.

Ho Кocoвo Je Cpпcкa. тaкo cвe OК. Гдe Cpбиa идe тaмo и Кocoвo (тo јe и Cpбиa). Or not Je Cpпcкa?

peniswriting

nope

Attached: 1532691613626.png (384x390, 175K)

>you just took the greek alphabet
>old church slavonic has 46 letters, greek alphabet has 24
way to be a retard

>and added some Glagolitic
which was also south slavic. way to be a retard

>and Jewish letters to it
for example?

>It's not more creative than what Peter I did in 1708.
>introducing one more letter and imitating latin lowercase is equal to creating a new alphabet

what

>slavic union
>Kazakhstan
> Kavkaz countries
With Portugal, everything is fine, just build a couple of Orthodox churches and you're in party
Pic - kazakhstan "slavic" - they are mongoloid race

Attached: 147118098811282452.jpg (1280x853, 293K)

No

this

>He includes the Baltic states

Galicia.
Yes.

Attached: 20181030_013519.jpg (1230x1711, 1.03M)

fuck c*stile

Attached: GALIZA.jpg (960x931, 123K)

NÓS.

Attached: Denantes.gif (637x547, 87K)

FASTER

Attached: fast Galiza.gif (500x545, 130K)

Ah sorry, yes.

Attached: DENANTES_MORTOS_QUE_ESCRAVOS.gif (637x547, 87K)

Estonians are Balts in denial

Attached: ngyR7LjBDIk.jpg (1477x836, 154K)

fuck off and die retard

>old church slavonic has 46 letters
Which are either combinations of already existing Greek/Glagolitic letters (I+Є > Ѥ, Ъ + I > ЪI etc) or straightforward borrowings. You don't really need to have a lot of creativity to mix alphabets. It definitively doesn't deserve as much credit as you require for it.

>which was also south slavic.
Except it was created by Greeks. Nobody except for Bulgarians considers Cyril and Methodius Slavs.

>introducing one more letter and imitating latin lowercase is equal to creating a new alphabet
Yes, getting rid of useless letters and making Cyrillic applicable for printing is equal to creating a new alphabet at this point.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=zvjSHuBPtfQ
a song for my based irmán

Attached: sereia de castelão.jpg (1920x1080, 379K)

Baseadinho.

there's nothing slavic except language in the first place, a similar language is all that any two slavs have in common

what else do you expect, ethnic or genetic similarities? similar culture? just no

>Russia
>slavs

Attached: xEWIyrY_l7o.jpg (2160x2160, 1.38M)

Only if Canada is part of it

Attached: Slavic_ancestry_in_the_USA_and_Canada.png (1749x1740, 95K)

yes

Attached: we wuz slavs.png (1984x1736, 140K)

No because ''Slavic'' is a language-family, not an ethnic group or a culture. The term was invented by the Russian Empire and used as a propaganda tool to subdue their colonized territories. The peoples that speak the various Slavic languages are of different ethnic, cultural and national origins, and have very little in common other than a recent history of Soviet/Communist occupation, and their historical christian religion, as well as shared European culture. The first usage of the term ''Slavic'' comes from a Croatian priest in Vatican city to advocate for the liberarian of a region in Croatia at that time.

if "slavs" don't exist in the sense of genetics and culture do germanics or any other ethnolinguistic group in europe also not exist?

Attached: c7c.png (612x491, 106K)

>redtugal

Wait, what?

Germans are genetically closer to Poles than to the Swiss, and Austrians are genetically closer to Hungarians than to people from northern Germany.
Germanics share a language and lots of common history, but even in our case genetics aren't what distinguishes us from the rest.

yes you dumb amerinigger.

Depends on the country. Denmark and Netherlands are probably the purest Germanics, South Germans and Swiss are mixed with Celts and Austrians are mixed with Hungarians and Slavs, East Germans are mixed with Slavs, Scandinavians are mixed with the descendants of Slavic/Baltic Thralls according to Varg

>Slavs can be treated as an ethnolinguistic group but only if you exclude the south.
No, how is a Czech culture similar to Ukrainian or Russian, its not.

You have to define what you mean by ''ethnic'' group first. We know every country has its own language. We know there are several language-family groups in Europe. So the language part of ''ethnoliguistic'' is clear, but what is ''ethno-''? The dictionary definition is ''population made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent''. By that definition, there are no two countries in Europe that are made up of the same ethnic group, with the small exception of countries like Moldova, or Belgium or Macedonia who have recently become a country as a result of war disputes.

We have to look at 3 things - genetic admixture, culture and identity. On that criteria, there is no Slavic, Germanic or Latin ''ethnolinguistic'' groups in Europe.

You should look at the origins of these terms to understand where they come from, and how they become part of the mainstream narrative.

Only with communism

Russians are third most Slavic people after Poles and Belarusians
Day of the rope soon for you Volga-Ural subhumans

>they're more related to turks and gypsies.
that's right, sl*void

Attached: 1541339651623.png (409x337, 184K)

Only small western part of Russia is Slavic. Central Russia is slav/finno ugric mixes. North-west is finno ugric, South is full of churkas and hohol-like creatures. Territories west of Ural are finno ugric. Siberea is full of mongoloids and le56 soviet mutts. Also millions of Tatar subhumans all over Southern Ural

Attached: 15440390349850.jpg (899x401, 275K)

This is what you subhumans want us to believe so hard. Russians are literally third most Slavic peoples after Poles and Belarusians. Ukrainians and Slovaks are Balkan mongrels, Czechs are half Germans.
Pray to Allah that we will deport you to Kazakhstan instead of puting in ovens.

Attached: a85d518.jpg (1738x1736, 515K)

Yes, but I fixed your picture tho

Attached: 1545393113422.png (1984x1736, 139K)

Damn, fyromania looks like that?

yes but in a house with a fence

Yes but not Skopje, Sofia is the best and safest Slavic city.

>all this mental gymnastics
Really no one here is desperate to be a Slav so what's your point with this exclusivistic treatment of southern ones as lesser than others? I'm saying it as a mere fact that Bosnia despite its cultural and religious ties still feels closer to Ukraine than Turkey

slavs can do whatever they want.
we are not slavs, so shouldn't be red. also why is that part of turkey red?

what are you than ?

Btw the identity crisis big 4 won't be spared from their inevitable fate as vodka niggers

Attached: 1545393113422.png (1984x1736, 139K)

mostly made up of the indigenous balkan population + bulgars. very little slavic blood

Only if there is a Tzar to rule, id be loyal.

Balts are just slavs in denial

I was arguing about the alphabet, not about South Slavs not being Slavic though. I'm just tired of hearing that retarded "muh alphabet" argument.

Total shit.

Attached: European Genetics 4.png (1576x1152, 357K)

eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml

Attached: dhdh.jpg (1975x987, 292K)

You show "the average temperature in a hospital", but Russia is 6500 km wide. Do you really believe that all russian citizens are same? Don't you distinguish them if you really live there?

What bugs me is the isolation of the South Slavs. Which country should serve as the corridor between the South ones and the rest of the Slavs?

Hungarians are pretty Slavic

Russian is an ethnicity, brainlet. Do you want Pakistanis to participate in English genetic studies?
Besides, Russia was colonized in a wholy different way and if you think that Russians near China look any different from Russians in Smolensk, you are deluded.
tapatalk.com/groups/anthroscape/people-from-khabarovsk-far-east-russia-t71610.html
Link related.

yes
we are the most slav of them all
therefore we should be kangz of this shithole superpower

otherwise no

Attached: 1365846505381.jpg (1029x1724, 675K)

Of course, "russian" is ethnicity, but I siad "russian citizens", not "russians". I see them regularly, and for me the ones from Smolensk, St.-Petersburg or Saransk look completely different. Because they are different no matter what they think of that. Russia is not national state. Just deal with it.

The only territory that can be saved in this country is the lands north of Tver.
Slavs just can't have good countries.

Attached: IMG_9216.jpg (876x670, 247K)

But We Wuznt Tsars.

You wuz "criminals in law" and goatfuckers.

Slovenes confirmed for purest Slavs

>flag

Attached: 3a7.jpg (680x680, 77K)

Attached: IMG_0594.png (956x720, 550K)

>genetically more related to Turks

Stop being retarded

Attached: 5GNa1Lb.png (2100x1525, 383K)

>Saransk
Literally capital of Mordovia

Attached: 1533595817393.png (645x729, 105K)

Why does everyone keep excluding Northern Bulgaria (i.e Romania) from such pics?

Attached: 1542615217888.png (1960x1793, 865K)

Northerners are closer to Balts/Estonians but whatever
Northeast Poles near Kaliningrad are Balts too

Congratulations! Finally you figured out that Russia is not a monoethnic state, and slavs is a least numerous ethnic group in it.

Imagine being this retarded
tapatalk.com/groups/anthroscape/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12077
View his posts with people from all over the country, Moscow will be the least Slavic of them all

Also, I would debate Mordvins not being Slavs
aquilaaquilonis.livejournal.com/611653.html

Mordivns are slavs that got finn'd.
Genetically they're like poles with siberian admixture so basically russians.

Galicia and Portugal are, though.

Genetically Poles are Russians with Mediterranean admixture.

Attached: 1544388984484.png (880x1280, 66K)

>Eesti
op should honestly be killed i make portugal my enemy