Which one is better and why?
Which one is better and why?
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
twitter.com
California
California thanks to Silicon Valley
california because it's democrat
Texas has lower taxes, much cheaper gas, cheaper rent. California is just so much more beautiful though.
Texas, California has shit tier politics
Texas, but because I am from there
Though California embraces multiculturalism, which means California very much doesn't want to be California but a salad of every other part of the world
I don't get it
California desu
Texas will become eventually the new California
Cali
It’s based and redpilled and not texass
Neither. Both states make you swear allegiance to Israel.
Nebraska.
My grand father got out of Texas to live in California
I hear the cities like dallas and houston are islands of civilisation in a dark sea of ignorance how true is this?
Very true.
They are basically the only places where you can do anything. There’s also fort worth and austin but austin is full of fuckin freaks
Texas
based
They're both retarded but Texas is marginally better
>dallas and houston are islands of civilisation in a dark sea of ignorance
leftist memes
to begin with, Houston is shit because the refugees from Hurricane Katrina in n*w orl*ans ruined the place and brought crime way up. There's little of value there.
>dallas
pretty sure this is really just to say Urban vs Rural, a trope mostly used for b8 because it predisposes that by living in a tiny apartment for a massive rent you're more knowledgeable, as if this were the 1800s where education only existed in cities, and champagne socialist leftist, ever crying for the elevation of lower classes actually hate those lower classes if they don't get in line for their thinking.
what is worth noting here is that the cities are of course Democrat, as are literally all inner cities across all America, but they don't have a complete and total stranglehold on Texas cities like they do in most. Rural Texas is overwhelmingly Republican, and the cities are only moderately Democrat.
take a gander at this: nytimes.com
those cities "should" be HARD blue, but that's only the very centers, and much of the populated peripheries are light colors.
lies, the Texas Hill Country is fantastic
t. metropolitan coastal bastard child
>oh god OH GOD MY RURAL ASS IS ON FIRE SOMEBODY GET THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER
yikes
also should have mentioned, i grew up in San Antonio and can confirm firsthand that there are large conservative social dispositions in cities here
both are superior to the rest of the country
California has better food and nature, so California.
i grew up actually on the very edge of town, half my neighborhood was in the city, the other half was not.
this way, i experienced both and confirm that it's only really Democrat in the very center of cities, and the rest is very evenly split.
if all the urban centers were as left wing as they say, Texas would be blue.
>better food
lies, filthy lies
Tex-Mex and BBQ are absolute kino
>and nature
fair, it takes a specific sort to enjoy most of Texas' hellish landscape though i did
>Tex-Mex and BBQ are absolute kino
Those are readily available in CA, along with far better everything else.
i can get Chinese food here, but i figure we're speaking on that which a place is KNOWN for
Tejas.