Do you love him?

his observations and methods were brilliant, but way of solving problems wasnt

Canada poster here
I saw that shit, I saw you reply to yourself, it was just you and me and there was 2 ips. Stop samefag bumping this shitty thread now, we get it there is some epic culture war you and your tranny discord buddies have but this is just pathetic, go shill this garbage on Jow Forums oh wait leftists cowards stay on Jow Forums lite where they can circlejerk because the board is so fucking slow.

Yup. As a marxist-leninist, I admire this guy whose teachings influenced successful leftist confederations like the European Union.

yikes

Attached: 1474744946334.gif (300x220, 2.15M)

One of the most brilliant scholars in human history. I think he was right about nearly everything and few of his detractors actually understand what he was talking about.

Historical materialism and the dialectic make no actual sense. It is historical revisionism being used to guess the future.

no

Attached: mikhail.png (583x738, 310K)

This is bait. His concepts were infantile and ridiculous, lacked any scrutiny of reality and real world effects and it only inspired low IQ people that used their right brain more than their left.
He was fucking bum that left his wife and children to die in misery while he gorged himself on the tabs of rich friends. Truly a leech in every sense.

True facts

youtube.com/watch?v=PaiXBEwsxVE

chill

best canadian post ive ever seem, OP needs to fuck off to Jow Forums

Weber blew him the fuck out

Material conditions drive history, that much is fact. I agree that the dialectic seems a bit mystical, like Jordan Peterson's chaos dragons bullshit, but it's just a strange framing device for a clearly observable historical process.

These aren't arguments. Have you actually read Marx?

What specific problems do you have with Marxist analyses or proposals? Do you think the bourgeoisie does not control our society, or that labor does not affect value?

He btfo'd classical economics so hard the mainstream moved to neoclassical economics. I'd say that's pretty based.

Marx was right
Marxists are wrong

NO! HE KILLED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE!! AND IS TRYING TO KILL THE WHITE RACE, NOT TO MENTION WHAT THE SOVIETS DID TO THE POLAND

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.u2.jpg (644x800, 71K)

how? he was a firm believer of classical economics and its labour theory of value wasn't he

Maybe a poor choice of words, but what I meant was that he exposed what happens when you take classical economics to their logical conclusion.

Surplus values is an illogical concept that makes no sense.
The bourgeoisie are workers, like the rest of the world. The entire planet is proletariat, everyone at the production process contributes something.
The list of richest people in the world constantly fluctuates and same families rarely maintain their positions.

Marxian economist are becoming more and more outdated as more and more markets that don't operate under his axioms become more and more relevant.
Classic economics are completely uncapable of analyzing software-based markets, and traditional means of production-based works that transform raw materials into goods are becoming more and more automated, destroying the whole concept of proletariat.

Only brainlets take the word of philosophers as fact as if it were science. Modern economists are barely any better but at least they don't get to renounce anything they want as "undialectical"

The LTV is bullshit
Violent revolutions create single party dictatorships and the socialist transition state is effectively serfdom under a different name
Alienation from production is a minor problem and easily fixable through capitalism anyway
The models and thinking behind "socialism is inevitable" is bullshit. Wages have continued to increase, the economy isn't a fixed pie; also capitalists are subject to competition from other capitalists for labor.
Exploitation is a meme. Capitalists charge rent in exchange for access to capital resources, a steady job, etc. The alternative for the worker is to go out on his own, raise all of the capital he needs to produce, and then market etc
Decentralized economies are more flexible and responsive to the constant changes, and also create far more efficient prices than democratic or otherwise political decision making
Prices are necessary to communicate need
"Socially necessary labor time" is impossible to measure and subject to different modes of production by different people with different amounts of capital

Or "revisionist" lmao

Like an imam calling something "infidel"

based
cringe

"Thank you, Marx"
I despise him, I hate him, I'm disgust by him. There's nothing in the world will make me love him.

Attached: jyoG073wQr8.jpg (941x1280, 415K)

Out of principle I hate him for being a kike, however his ideas aren't all without merit.

He was Jewish, not German.