Do you love Japan?
Do you love Japan?
Jose Torres
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Adrian Hall
yeah
Adam Wright
We love islands.
Samuel Cruz
No, your poster are insufferable.
Josiah Turner
Do you love the Kuril islands?
Justin Brown
yes
its very disappointing that Japan barely promotes their pre-buddhist history, when i went to visit Kofuns it was barely indicated anywhere and were really hard to see, even though its some of the most unique structures in Asia
Nicholas Gomez
no
i only love ezo republic
fuck japan
Justin Ross
Japanese are Portugal's friend, please make Kuneru Marta anime
Jace Scott
Josiah Sanchez
No.
Eli Foster
Especially Kuril islands.
Thomas Mitchell
There's some in South Korea too. I wonder why...
Nathan Adams
Those Kofun in korea is newer and biggest and oldest Kofun is founded in japan.
Kofun is special tombs of the king or elite person of ancient Japanese.
Other race didn’t make Kofun.
Also largest Kofun is most wider tombs of the whole world Bytheway.
Also Japanese green stone is founded in Kofun in korea.
Actually this is just meaning southern part of korea was under the rule of ancient Japanese.
Even Americans and Chinese scholars are saying so too
The textbook produced by Oxford University Press, publishing textbooks in about 50 countries around the world, states that "Japan's power in the 5th century dominated the south of the Korean Peninsula." The American textbook "World Culture" published by Prentice Hall "is" around the year CE, (until Japan), until a group of several clans unified to unify the majority of Japan and govern the southern region of Korea "The textbooks in Canada and Australia also have similar descriptions [28].
In the online encyclopedia of Columbia University and the Library of Congress, "Old Korea was a country built by Chinese and Minoko in the northern part of the Korean Peninsula in the 12th century BC. At that time, the southern part of the Korean Peninsula was dominated by the Japanese Yamato administration It was written "It was under" [29].
In the People's Republic of China, the textbook "World History Lecture" published by Shanghai People's Publishing Company states that "Shilla has recovered the Nenna district that was the basis of the Japanese for a long time in the southern peninsula from the early days" There [30]. In the Japanese history column of the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, "Although the beginning of the 5th century, the power expanded to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula during the period when Yamato became prosperous", it was protested from the Korean government , Deleted all parts of Japanese history before the Second World War from the Japan Introduction column [31].
Ryan Foster
Also this is record of the ancient china.
Those American and Chinese scholars are made those result of resurch by those primary record of ancient China.
David Hernandez
no, you steal culture
Wyatt Butler
Zhang.
Christopher Williams
i dont netouyo autism but yes korean kofuns are definitely a proof of japanese influence on south korea and the ancient cultural ties between korea and japan were quite fruitful, sadly China broke this special relationship
Carson Butler
If that's true, why does it say on Wikipedia that Gaya (任那) in the south of Korea spoke Korean language? Why would Wikipedia lie? Maybe really Koreans built the burial mounds in Japan
Caleb Fisher
First of all, modern korea and ancient korean is different and more than your imagine, korean doesn’t have older record. Also we have no record exactly how the language of ancient time of korea was.
All we can see the ancient record of east Asia is relly on Chinese ancient record.
And this is saying this And that’s why American and Chinese historians concluded this Also korean of now is not ancient Yayoi Japanese.
Ancient Yayoi Japanese is mostly WU tribe of south chinese.
In fact kimono has influenced from WU Chinese dress.
About this. Ancient Japanese Island was as like new world for ancient east asisn. Just you can imagine ancient japan was USA. Ancient china was europ and ancient Korea was Ireland.
Ancient japan has big army more than people imagine(offcouse they were related WU Chinese and united many tribe in Japanese island. Its alll recoded. Izumo, kumaso, ise, Hayato, kashima, katori, emishi, Ainu(who were in east noth) was united by Yamato(wa) who established shogunate and samurai later.
And look at those ancient war
en.m.wikipedia.org
Japan and the Baekje was ally. In wiki it says baekje was forced to ally with japan but there is no mentioned those records it’s ideology after ww2 that japan must evil.
Japan has big influence at southern Korea and china(tang) had influence at mother part of korea.
Those Koran kingdom was subjected of japan or china at at that time.
Ancient Chinese Record is saying here So USA and Chinese historian concluded here And modern Korea was the descendants of people who allied with China and mixed with northern Mongolia later at the subjected of the Qing dynasty 500year of korean history.
I’m not netuyo Bytheway it’s just truth based on the record
Nathaniel Lewis
Sorry I mean tang Chinese had influence northern part of Korea.
Charles Bailey
好きだ
John Reed
Generally, Westerners who do not know about Korea often refer to Japanese textbooks when making textbooks
That's why their textbooks have such a vague claim, The same goes for those textbooks. In general, the textbook is wrong.
But, No Western scholar said any influence on southern part of Korea
On the contrary, they say that Koreans formed Japan.
At the same time, Japanese scholars do the same
Jace Cruz
Read the resurch of the Harvard university about ancient east Asia
It says also japan controlled southern part of the korea.
Also CHINESE government themself is accepted southern part of Korea was subjected to Japanese.
Read well
Austin Brown
Now look the ancient Chinese record
I did google translater for you becouse gook can’t read ancient chinese record
I’ll do this way and show you every ancient Chinese record and how ancient Chinese record (only the primary record of the east asisn history) were saying the position of the Japanese and korean
Now try to against google translater
Ok now tell me one by one of the Chinese character and how correct your sentence
而 倭以 耒卯年 japan in the sinmyo year
來 come
渡海 across the sea
破 defeated
百殘 Baekje
新羅 sills
以為 made them
臣民 subjects
There is no any meaning except this.
How you could interpolate this you fucker
Noah Scott
倭 is kanji of the Japanese Bytheway
Mason White
Book of the Song Dynasty
詔除武使
持節都督
倭
新羅
任那
加羅
秦韓
慕韓
六國諸軍事
安東大將軍
倭王
Eliminate military ambassador
Governor
Japanese
Silla
Ren
Garro
Qin Han
Mu Han
Military of the six countries
General Anton
Japanese king
en.m.wikipedia.org
k_of_Song
Logan Allen
why koreans are so fucking cringe
Jordan Roberts
Portraits of Periodical Offering
斯羅國,
本
東 夷
辰韓
之小國也。
魏
時
曰
新羅,
宋
時
曰
斯羅,
其實一也。
或属 韓
或属 倭
國王
不能
自通使聘。
普通二年,
其王
名
募秦,
始使隨
百濟
奉表献方物。
其國有城,
號曰健年。
其
俗與
高麗
相類。
無文字,
刻木為範,
言語待百濟
而後通焉
Sloan,
this
East barbarian
Chen Han
The small country also.
Wei
Time
曰
Silla,
Song
Time
曰
Sloan,
In fact, one.
Subject
Or Han
Or Japan
king
Can not
Self-commissioned.
Ordinary two years,
King
name
Recruit Qin,
Start with
Baekje
Form
Dedication.
Its state-owned city,
number
Jian Jiannian.
its
Vulgar
Koryo
Similar.
No text,
Carved for the wood,
Speech to be Baekje
Then wanted
Samuel Sanders
>this thread
Chase Powell
based
Adam Anderson
This is evidence that you are stupid.
Instead of the facts recognized among historians, you bring textbook content that can be modified at any time
It's just a bullshit based on Japanese textbooks.
Historical facts are recognized among historians
Because you do not have the same people as your assertion among Western historians So you brought the contents of the textbook. The problem is that there is no evidence that the contents of the textbook are true.
Because all Western scholars do not admit that
Noah Sullivan
im sorry i just wanted to talk about kofuns
Bentley Lee
Yes i love japan
Nolan Sanders
you aren't the one to be blamed
Nolan Lee
How the hell japan could modified official ancient record of the Chinese ancient book
And as I saied since korea and japan had no exact oldest ancient history records , what we can study the ancient eat asis is ONLY from ancient chineee record.
If you want against this you most against ancient chinese record becouse it’s only internationally accepted primary evidence of the ancient east asisn historyTod is the reason Chinese gorvenment themself accepted that southern part of the korea was subjected to ancient japan
Read here In the People's Republic of China, the textbook "World History Lecture" published by Shanghai People's Publishing Company states that "Shilla has recovered the Nenna district that was the basis of the Japanese for a long time in the southern peninsula from the early days" There [30]. In the Japanese history column of the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, "Although the beginning of the 5th century, the power expanded to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula during the period when Yamato became prosperous", it was protested from the Korean government , Deleted all parts of Japanese history before the Second World War from the Japan Introduction column [31].
Benjamin Evans
Hey look here I’m talking about Kofun.
I’ll talk anything about Kofun. Tell me your interests about Kofun.
Chase Cox
my high school was about 5km from this kofun
and never been there
local people are note interested
Connor Johnson
Thanks
Gavin Thomas
Nathaniel Bailey
Evidence is primary Chinese ancient historical record book which is only primary evidence of east asisn study since japan and korea had no oldest record of its history.
Google translate says it’s true So harverd uni and Chinese gorvenment accepted southern part of the korea was subjected to japan
Check mate gook
Brayden Taylor
extremely redpilled
Cooper Ortiz
I think I love South Korea now and I want to suck a South Korean boy's dick.
Matthew Myers
Submit primary evidence and try to against chinese ancient record.
Eli Howard
yes i love japan!
Nicholas Clark
Thank you for loving Japan!
Hudson Kelly
i love korea vs japan threads
Easton Ross
This is the same level of fucktarded reasoning that leads people to say that the French conquered England because William I came from Normandy, or that the French founded Germany because Charlemagne was a Frank.
The funny thing is that French don't believe such nonsense, because they have a real history in which they can take pride. Just as with the "Koreans created Japan" story, actually, I've only heard it from Koreans, far-left Japanese (i.e., Zainichi Koreans using Japanese names), and the occasional German. These sorts of "theories" are deliberate and blatant misunderstandings of history, often mere fabrications, made up out of envy and spite, to insult superior nations out of a sense of inferiority.
what are you rambling on gook?
it's pretty much the scholarly consensus outside korea that baekje and silla were subjugated by yamato as always.
japanese, chinese and western historians all agree while only gooks fall back on fantasies. seriously what level of mental gymnastics make it possible for you gooks to fall for the fantasy when even royal families of baekje and silla were taken as hostages by yamato and the story is recorded not only on japanese chronicles but your own primary history record, samguk sagi? korea's been japan's vassal from the get go, and your obsession with japan and imperial family comes from this miserable history.
Xavier Young
Hunter Hall
based
fuck japan
love korea
simple as
Justin Rogers
勿論
Aaron Morales
Im in love with you please take me