Disgusting, I want to puke

Attached: 463464634.png (283x231, 137K)

Fuck off Chinamen. No one likes your country

this really triggers koreans
yo fat

Attached: 1544062822337.jpg (850x477, 50K)

dont pretend to be a chinese. i know ur korean and have jap-hate folders full of jap hating memes.
look at the all triggered korean in the comment section

and nobody likes yours either :)
oh btw please do not call me 'Chinaman'.
I am Canadian

Attached: canada flag.jpg (1600x1200, 285K)

I do like China
they give us cheap products.
meanwhile america gives us only trouble. I dislike america and it's people.

Attached: 80rN7me_2.jpg (517x411, 39K)

truly based

Based and redpilled

>dont pretend to be Chinese
I don't
I am Canadian
>i know ur korean and have jap-hate folders full of jap hating memes
and how can you prove that? are they really memes if they are true?
>look at triggered korean in the comment section
???what comment section

Attached: 490697020-612x612.jpg (612x356, 37K)

We Japanese are the worst kind of asian [sad emoji]. Ancestors of we Japanese were bullied and abused so hard that made them think escaping from the continent and risking their lives in unseaworthy boats is a good idea. You extract weakest ones from asian and you get japs.

Attached: Y3G68zI.jpg (763x1200, 217K)

Why is it always a god damn Canadian with a hardon for China? Didn't they fuck the housing market there?

more and more Canadians and indeed people around the world are seeing how evil America is
you never backed up Canada in Saudi Arabia dispute and your country fuck us over in trade deals and isolate us diplomatically
it is a small movement now but soon all of Canada and indeed the entire world will be against America
we've had enough of your cancerous influence

Attached: 1534320401086.jpg (670x502, 59K)

this of course doesn't even mention Huawei crisis, even when we appease you, you will still fuck us over
it is only a matter of time

We backed you up against Saudi Arabia, Trump just didn't.

Also that's a pretty stupid thing to do to ignore all of the travesties committed by China because you have some angst against your closest neighbor.

япoшки-хyecoшки

That's too bad. We like Russians.

same thing would have happened under any other presidency
naturally if the worlds greatest power under our country becomes hostile towards us we should start to align ourselves with the other world power
their ideology has created much success for them and our nation under Socialism with Chinese Characteristics will prevail to be a nation stronger than any before

Attached: 1508316200428.jpg (620x511, 131K)

>hostile
We aren't hostile, we just have an idiot spouting shit at the helm. Our cultures and economies are tied so tight, removing them would shock America, and destroy Canada.

In the end of the day we are still both western democracies that are far too similar to ever truly be enemies. Now go back to China, and stop ruining the Canadian housing market.

western democracy has proved itself to create weak individuals and divides nations, the biggest mistake our nation made was removing the influences of the monarchy and adopting the American cultural imperialism
only once we seek a strong government will we become a strong country. we along with Russia and China will be one of the last bastions of civilization left in this crumbling world

Attached: 1545703860125.jpg (1836x2000, 383K)

Oh! So you suffer from laziness in understanding world issues so you look up to people who build a cult of personality instead.

Here's a painful truth. No matter what you do there will always be the people at top taking advantage of things for their own good, and tying yourself to a singular individual does nothing to change that. All it does is make the good times better, and the bad times catastrophic.

yes, and I would rather my government have absolute power than be deluded into having freedom (as per democracies)
weakness stems from division, which is the principle of democracy
only through absolute rule and abolishment of the other cancer known as free market capitalism can humans prosper in a new glorious era

Attached: 1539446561924.jpg (600x862, 89K)

You just want society to provide for your NEET ass, and to have a figure head you can look up to as a strong father figure that you never had.

But I'll humor you for a moment. Explain to me why exactly a system with a singular person having total authority be better? I mean sure, things can get done more often, but you are placing all of your trust on this one person, and historically that has gone bad more often than it has right.

So please make your case.

>you want society to provide for your neet ass
but I'm not a neet
>strong father figure
nice try Freud
>explain to me why system with singular person is better
only through single person rule can a country have firm policy and make strategic decisions that are incredibly important when managing a country; another inherent fault of democracy is that policy changes every 4 years not allowing for decisions to get made. the fact you mentioned this probably indicates that you too know how inferior a democracy is compared to authoritarian rule; strategic planning is incredibly important when it comes to countries as most decisions made refer to the long term, and changing your national priority every 4 years for the guise of 'freedom' (also known as tyrant of the majority) is bound to turn your country into a shithole
>trust on one person
this is why only the best come to rule. a weakness in monarchies is that eventually a weak kid will be born, but if a government is meritocratic and only the best minds in the nation vote for a great leader to guide their nation to rule till death, then that is no longer a problem

Ah! But no government is a true meritocracy. To have a true meritocracy you must have a system with rule of law. What a system such as China's does encourage ability to circumnavigate the intrigue of a singular party state which does not translate to making decisions of the state. You can see that very well in the CCP. Xi himself isn't that adept at making all the decisions involved in the running of the state. I'll admit he is good, but he is also out of touch, as are all those making decisions there.

It also leads to a shit ton of corruption because a single person can't keep everything in check. The limits of a single person's abilities will always lead to disaster eventually if they try to take everything under them.

I will agree that it could be a useful tool during circumstances to allow a specific person majority control of a state, even the Romans recognized that and the republic had a system to appoint a dictator temporarily. Even so that system was exploited by those seeking to further their own power, and this would lead to both good, and bad side effects for the general populace.

But I'm getting off topic a big here. My overall point is that we are where we are at this point in time due to the free exchange of ideas. If we all begin living in a society where free exchange of ideas are limited then the state is intentionally limiting it's human resources for the benefit of stability.

Also policy doesn't change every 4 years, many policies are kept, and the whole cycle acts almost like a filtration system. It's why democracies always do the right thing eventually, whether it be due to the general populace accepting a change or because it's become a generally accepted successful policy.
And no, I don't think it's an inferior system to authoritarianism. I loath authoritarianism for it's tendency to stomp on the common person, and to breed a state that sees it's citizens as the enemy. I merely accept democracy for it's flaws.

>no government is a true meritocracy
or are they?
only the best rise to the top in the grueling Chinese system to be the successor in the Communist party
>he is also out of touch
wrong
he is one of the best leaders China has had for a very long time
it is the results of his thought that are revitalizing China for a new glorious era
>corruption
all been cleansed under based Xi Pings rule
corruption is also inherent in democracies; why is it that the same rich families are the only ones who get to be elected as president?
>free exchange of ideas
who says that it will disappear under authoritarian rule? in the same way we have laws against hate speech speech against the government should be prohibited as it actively weakens a country
democracy is the scourge of the weak and people prove time and time again they aren't capable of freedom as they do not have responsibility
only through grueling authoritarian rule can we keep the animals in check and let superior people rise through the ranks. people are the enemy as capitalism breeds people to fetishize materials and become self-centered and greedy, so either the capitalist system must be abolished and people re-educated to create a perfect system or give the people the system they fed their-selves into

Explain what Xi has done that can't be directly linked to the policies of the past.

>They aren't out of touch
Talk to the average Chinese person between 15-30 years of age. They want more personal freedoms in general, but are more or less too beaten down to do anything.

>Cleansed corruption
You mean his political enemies?

>Free exchange of ideas
I can't tell who is being more cynical of humanity here lol.

>Capitalism breeds materialism
Yeah, but have you met the average Chinese person? They have somehow made a more materialist culture than the US. The measure of a person there is what they own, and the concept of charity just doesn't exist.

>Only the best rise to the top
The best at what, and the best for whom is the question here. I believe it's whoever is the best at navigating the party politics, and it's generally only best for maintaining party rule over the masses, and if that includes economic growth then it will seek to achieve that. What happens when it fails though? What happens when in the next 50 years China sees it's first signs of stagnation? The Trade war has shown how dependent they are on foreign trade for their economic growth, and has shown that their economy isn't just some immortal untouchable growing machine. That is assuming they don't lie about their numbers.

Jap monkies are barking

Attached: 1545902871840.png (911x710, 110K)

>what Xi has done
don't even make me start
>invest billions of dollars into places like Africa, and unlike the Europeans improve quality of life there drastically in exchange for resources
>articulate his nation to deal with slowing economy and rising problems that are going to arise China in the future as a result of rapid economic development
>get rid of the aristocrats and corrupt people who originated in the regime to create a cleaner and even stronger government
>end the one child policy and make moves to create a sustainable birthrate for the nation unlike India/western nations
>finally start making decisions to end the imperialist colony of Hong Kong and rightfully add it to the Chinese mainland
Xi Ping will be seen as a hero of the Chinese nation a few dozen years into the future as he will be the one to have saved China during the time when she needs to be saved the most in the final endeavour to becoming a world power
to beat your enemy you must become even more powerful than them, and unfortunately capitalism is the greatest at creating power that Chinese made a reformed capitalist system so inherently brutal it makes western nations shake in fear at comparison
combined with the perfect authoritarian rule its not hard to say the future belongs to them
they will kick you out of Asia
they will kick you out of South America
they will kick you out of Europe
and then they will kick you out of your own continent

Attached: China-wb.jpg (600x547, 16K)

So may I ask one final question? Why don't you move to China? There are many ways to get in there, and I'm sure if you swore your loyalty to the state they would accept you.

I'm not going to continue debating though. You have your ideas, and I have mine that disagree with them, only the future will see who is right.

>why don't you move to China
because the country still has much modernizing to do, getting citizenship if you aren't an investor is insanely difficult (only around 1000-2000 people have it) and my time can be better spent here for the time being
they have not reached their peak yet but that peak is going to come in our life time, and only then will the Chinese dream truly come to be

ARR ROOK SAME