>I don't even know where you pulled that bs from
if you ever actually shot your gun or went to IDPA youd see all the broken glock mags, especially baseplates. post any handgun you own other than a glawk
Why are new pistols so yuck
this is now a perfection™ thread
>>Make thread only to just discuss aesthetics and quality feel built into older guns and not newer guns.
>>obsessing
Ok.
most beretta's dont make for good CC guns but
>but there has never been a really good compact or subcompact Beretta 92
uhhh...
This
I’ve owned both a 19 and a 17 and they were nothing special. They’re sold at bargain bin prices to LEOs and Military which is why they adopt them so often. And Glocks do have a reputation for malfunction, whether sperganon likes it or not, as well as the fact that they use cost cutting measures to keep them cheap, like using subpar sights, trigger and finish to keep the price low. As a consumer, your money is better spent elsewhere since just about every manufacturer offers what glock does and more.
Pic related is the glock I last owned. Got a 92 in its place lol
>a S&W sigma blocks your path
Those triggers are gritty as duck, have a hard reset and heavily break, the "safety" doesnt line up with the rest of the pad meaning you have a small pivot point that can easily pull either way.
Also yeah, out of 3 mags on my gen 4 two would engage the slide catch with rounds in them.
And yes the sights suck from the factory, and even glocks upgrades suck and should have been fixed by now.
Their slide coating is great, ugly but good. Ill give them that.
This is now aesthetic gun thread.
keep your rust out of here
> don’t seek nice things
> just accept things for being
> kinda ok
> doesn’t matter if you love it, you can save weight and money
> going with the safe option
> don’t worry about bored
> the gun is already more accurate than you and better
Are glockfags the actual suwiboys though?