Why are tanks and airplanes even built?

man portable anti tank missiles have several issue including weight, accuracy, and effective armor penetration.

while a typical LAW is effective against most WWII tanks it lacks the punch for anything built now. in order to make tanks obsolete you would one have to have a surefire way to end tanks as infantry, the AT4 is seen more of a countermeasure and not a solution as a tank can do massive damage before it can enter the range of the counter measure, which is why other tanks and TOW are common.

the same applies for man-portable anti air missiles, in that they are basically only good against helicopters.

Most infantry with anti tank weapons are motorized or mechanized. They themselves are part of an armored vehicle that is more so the platform of those weapons.

You haven't seen me after I eat MREs for a week.

>Use only infantry
>Your enemy specializes their equipment for anti-infantry work
>Suddenly roll out the tanks
>Your enemy has no weapons that can hurt them
I am a tactical genius.

An F-16 can carry 4 tomahawks of payload onto a target, then go back home and do it again hundreds of times