>Obviously you cant carry these
Except for the ones you can, which are the ones that actually make sense. Shame about that NFA thing.
youtube.com
Thoughts on pistol stocks?
Ian Kelly
Lincoln Torres
There is little call for Pistol stocks that can't be answered by a proper pistol-caliber-carbine. PCC's do the job better, have a cheek weld, better grip, better optics compatibility, and are only slightly less concealable than this rigamarole.
Basically Pistol stocks are the poor mans PCC, but even PCC's come in at $400 picrelated.
John Perez
>hiking and see a pig at 75 yards you'll kill with 9mm
Not gonna happen, plus you have to pack the meat out anyway, what's a difference of 4 lbs?
Regardless 4 lbs isn't gonna break the bank, the OP asked about home defense anyway, in which case a stocked pistol is retarded. The general rule is to buy the right tool for the job, a detachable stock and halfassed foregrip aren't the right tool for any job except meming at the range.
Mason Thompson
>9mm is the only caliber that can be stocked
>not going to happen
Sorry you live innacity user.
He asked a few questions about them including home defense. Which yes stocked pistols are retarded, as there's no real weight issues, and only slight size issues. A sub gun or sbr/pistol would be far far better.
I've gone on a number of trips where I carried only a handgun and a stock would have been useful for shooting critters, for coyotes to marmots and similar. The application of a pistol with a stock is pretty limited. I'm not really arguing they are good by any means just there's a few instances where they could be useful.
Eli Baker
>9mm
>ad hominem
Bro anyone concerned about cost of a stock vs value of buying a second gun isn't gonna be shooting rounds more expensive than 18 cents.
You can't ethically kill a pig at 75 yards with a pistol caliber unless you're just trying to be a faggot and shoot a wild animal 6 times.
>he asked a few things
>Obviously you cant carry these, so its only useful for home defense. Are they practical for this or are you better off just buying a real pdw instead of a glorified pistol?
These are the things he asked that are relative to what we've discussed
>I've done a thing and a thing might have been useful for unethically killing animals for no reason
Grats dude meme status of pistol stock confirmed
Christian Evans
The whole point of a PDW is to boost the effective range/fire of a sidearm without going up to the size and weight of an actual SMG. pistols with stocks fall into this first category, and PCCs fall into the second. Yes, if you CAN carry a PCC or a rifle, it is significantly more useful. If you can't though, a stock on a pistol will be a whole lot better than a handgun on its own. Just pick the right tool for the job.
Noah Bennett
Fucking no guns
Evan Adams
???? Who said anything about the cost of the stock?
>can't ethically kill a pig at 75 yards with a pistol caliber
You sure as shit can. Even comfortably with 9mm, we'll ignore all of the significantly more capable handgun calibers, because according to you, 45acp, 45 Rowland, 44mag, 357 mag, 500 s&w mag, 50ae, 454, 460, 10mm, are all incapable of taking game at distance without shooting it 6 times like a faggot. (also non of these can be stocked that's only glocks in 9mm) 147gr 9mm is still over 900fps at 75 yards. That's a little less than 300ftlbs. Buffalo have humanely been killed with ~500ft lbs.
You clearly have never hunted nor understand the capability of bullets.
grandviewoutdoors.com
>those are air rifles its different!
It's a 9mm 147gr bullet vs a 9mm 147gr bullet, except the pistol cartridge makes significantly more energy.
>The .357 stands out in my experience as the true “multi-species” gun. It is fairly flat shooting, hard hitting and has good terminal performance on deer- and hog-sized game. I’ve taken fox, coyote, turkey, javalina, deer and hogs with this set up, and it has done it all very well. Reaching out to 120 yards on a fox you really appreciate the flat trajectory and accuracy achieved. When shooting a tough, large-bodied boar at 40 yards, it’s the penetration that stands out.
>I've never been out or hunting
Wow I guess the pistol stock is useless thanks for confirming. I didn't even think about what if there was 40 attackers in a tactical situation.
>inb4 not related
>>Thoughts on pistol stocks?
>> Does shouldering a pistol really make you a more effective shooter in such a way that it makes up for the handling and price trade off?
So clearly they have a place and your just to retarded and dense to see it, since everything is high speed low drag oper8r shit.
Andrew Rodriguez
I knew you were gonna do some dumb shit like this and go off in the weeds.
The question started asking about putting a stock on a semiauto, not specifically hunting with revolvers and shit you mongo.
Stop, you're just trying to be right and it's embarrassingly obvious.
Jeremiah Bennett
>your just to retarded