Get lean user

Get lean user.

A good baseline is weighting 10 kg less than your height in cm, if you're 175 cm, you should aim to weight 65kg.

Don't fall for the bulk meme

Attached: b78f21fe154ed55d20b8f48bffa1820f--sexy-guys-sexy-men[1].jpg (236x314, 9K)

That guy weights around his height -100cm, definitely way more than your retarded -10kg

also kek @ his pathetic legs

Don’t fall for the little twink meme

Hot, we need more twinks.

Attached: 8d4.png (250x244, 88K)

im 5'10, so i should weigh 147 lbs? lmao

no

This is my goal body. What's the best way to achieve this

Yes

So I have to weigh 55kg

Do situps and bench press. NEVER do legs. Have good genetics

yes nigger, i consume of all of those things daily just to be able to maintain my lean mass instead of shedding weight. no need to get mad over my freakish metabolism, fatty.

Ok no need to be hostile fatty.

I want to be strong though.
>B-but girls
I don't lift for them. If you do that is fine, your reason is your reason. I personally don't think looks are everything to girls anyway, I'm way more confident knowing I'm one of the strongest guys in my gym than I would be if I had a six pack.

Actually my goal is 85kg at 185 cm as I’m currently at 76kg.
>inb4 do more late and traps
I already am this pic is from 2 months ago.

Attached: F96AA4E0-2587-4D28-9467-EFE9A88A6400.jpg (3264x2448, 1.09M)

im not fat, im a skinnyfat alcoholic. im "hostile" because gaining weight is literally the easiest thing in the world unless you live in some 3rd world shithole where you eat rice and plants all day

found the obese american guys

=(

As a 175cm slim person with a Tom Hardy/Marky Mark body type, this is shitty advice. Bulk more or you'll be constantly weightmogged by actual men of all heights

i'd say losing weight is the easiest thing in the world, based on my personal experience. but unlike you i understand that the opposite is true for other people.

Good ottermode upperbody but his legs are too smol.

tfw 190.5cm and 73kg

>fancies himself a man
>weighs less than 200lbs

lmaoing at your life, manlets

>50 kg
No, that would be a little low for me.
Goal is 55kg, current weight is 60 kg.

172
64kg
According to scale 29%bf (grill)
I'm definitely not lean

Attached: 5E13B6ED-DFC7-4211-BD70-3F084A658A1E.jpg (320x460, 36K)

but then my arms wont look like dicks anymore

Attached: 20180814_191959.jpg (978x955, 375K)

No, height -100 is where it’s at

180cm - 80kg ideal

Shit that's me. I float around 80-82. I was 85kg in January, but felt fat and weak after basically three years away from the gym and only running and swimming occasionally. Been going to the gym religiously and trying to run (around 10-12k per run) and swim (2.5-3k). I know it's a meme, but being lean is the ideal for me. I want my body to be as efficient as possible (maximum strength in a decent size package).

Never do legs? Stupid retard. Training your lower body increases gains in upper body. You can always stop training legs when you're already buff af if you truly want those legs.

Yeah, my best physique was that height and weight too. Now I’m 10kg heavier after a year of not caring much about diet, striving to go back, mostly by swimming

Nice body.

I'm just starting out. Went from 187cm 96kg to 87kg now. Wanna cut further to 80kg and do a clean bulk from there till 85, go back to 80 with a cut, then just put on lean muscle mass till i reach >80 again.

>10kg like then you height in cm
>180cm tall
>need to weigh 170kg
Okay

Attached: 1535928544499.jpg (1080x1077, 62K)

Meant to say less than but my brain broke because of how stupid this is

>45,44kg lean body mass
Holy shit, do you have no muscles at all?

did I fucking stutter? drink some mutant mass you twink faggot

Attached: 1526139730268.gif (537x294, 3.47M)

Try lifting weights

>freakish metabolism

lol

Variance in metabolism is 4-7%. 5% of 2500 calories: 125 extra calories you have to eat more than someone with a "normal" metabolism. OH NO, that's literally a GLASS OF MILK EXTRA A DAY. Must be SO HARD to be a hard gainer.

you have to ____ __

Attached: 1516236074977.png (285x401, 181K)

variance in BMR is small, variance in NEAT in response to overfeeding or underfeeding is much higher than that and accounts for why on controlled diets with the same caloric surpluses some people will gain all the weight they were supposed to and some will gain much less

You're not eating nearly as much as you think you are

I am 190cm and have weighted around 80kg for as long as I remember.

I am kinda a lanklet

My ideal weight would probably be 85 to 90kg. So I guess the rule is just subtract 100 from your height.

I just started again 3 months ago and I'm only at 55kg DL and 40kg squat for reps (3x12 hypertrophy) but I'm pretty sure my scale is lying.

185 cm => 185 lbs
185 lbs = 84kg
84kg -10 = 74 kg
Actually that used to be my "peak time" body weight

this guy is about 70kg

>be 5'8
OP you're telling me i have to be 135 pounds for my height? what kind of skelly would do that to themselves

OP's law doesn't really work on manlets

You're right but people here like being fat and making bullshit excuses to justify it.

the taller you get you're still just as skelly as any other height. you may weigh more because of the height difference but bmi is the exact same. that's skelly territory.

>weighting 10 kg less than your height in cm, if you're 175 cm, you should aim to weight 65kg

That's not how subtraction works

wat? fuck no.
I'm 174cm and 67 kg at 12% bf and I could stand to gain at least 5kg of muscle on top of what I already have.

yeah okay, i thought we already established that it makes more sense if you take away just the metre, not the 10kg

If I went by this "baseline" I'd be the 132lb skelly that I was before I started lifting.

Cont. And that would mean losing all my gains thus far.

post body

this is the most retarded shit I've read in Jow Forums this week.

Whats the BF% estimate on someone like catface

hes 6'2 120

Attached: 00808_3JvDGFzlrPA_600x450.jpg (337x450, 16K)

>175 - 10 = 65
What

But hey, that actually kind of works if you change kg to lb. At 5'10 my weight goal is ~165-170 pounds and that's right where it puts me at height - 10

Get big and then get lean (5'10", 180 lbs). Just dipped body weight plus 3 plates for 5 sets of 5, so, still mildly strong

Attached: 41540762_550172898746550_3681479033637306368_n.jpg (480x640, 35K)

As a 175cm slim person with a Tom Hardy/Marky Mark body type, this is shitty advice. Bulk more or you'll be constantly weightmogged by actual men of all heights

You look like you just escaped Auschwitz.

Stop worrying about body fat % and just eat.

>190 cm
>I should weight 180lbs?
Even if I had 0% bodyfat I couldnt hit that.

I think it should be 10lbs plus your height in pounds.

I am 190cm I have no idea how you are so light.

You must have tiny bones or a small frame or you just dont lift at all.

My lean body mass is 83kg

Your metric stuff makes my head hurt. How does that work in American numbers?

>tfw iwn be this symmetrical
why live?

user, you have a great bod and really good genetics

>178 cm
>~ 63 kg
>Pic related. Skinny fat, but I can't lose weight. Also: sedentary, planning on bodyweight and running, would be enough? Should I reach 70 kg instead?

Attached: Skinny-Fat-Male.png (333x503, 46K)

Cute.

180 cm here, 64 kg, is 70 kg ideal? I want to keep lean, just tone a bit, only concern is belly fat

Attached: Skinny-Fat-Male.png (333x503, 46K)

Ty baby

This is disgusting, you get that right?

5'11"
155 lbs
12 % BF

have I made it?

Do you count your calories?

Count everything.

I doubt you're at 3500kcal+
Even 3000kcal should be enough.

yes don't fall for the amazing fucking size and strenght beginner gains at the cost of some miniscule fat gain, if you're not McDonalds bulking

What the fuck is the point of sub 12-14% bf? I live in a cold climate, a t-shirt is on 99% of the time. As long as I avoid hanging belly fat and/or pronounced love handles (which is easily 20%+), I honestly don't give a fuck (I'm 16-18% now if I had to guess)

I'm 185cm and look fat at 170lbs. Or maybe that's the body dysphoria.

I'm 178cm and I just cut down to 80kg, I don't look fat.

In general, unless you have hanging belly fat and/or enormous love handles, you don't look fat.

In stead of trying to go sub 30" waist male model posing mode, just get bigger everything else.

Bigger chest+arms+shoulders+lats at the same waist = you look slimmer.

would really like to know how you got 147
stupid FUCKING americans i can't TAKE it ANYMORE!!!!!

>5’
Sorry, you will never make it

im 196cm and weigh 86kg which is -10 but I still dont look like that cause ain't got no muscle my dudes.

OP cant into math

5'10" = 60"
60 * 2.54 = 177.8 cm

At this point he rounds down to the whole cm to get 177

177 - 110 = 67 kg
67 * 2.2 = 147.4 lbs

>weight and height in faggot europeein' units
No thanks OP, I'm straight.

Thats not a twink user.

Attached: C4B093C00DA944B4B62484F919B253F0.jpg (1080x1001, 116K)

i agree 100%

>193
>83kg~
I'm a skellington. Your rule is fucking dumb.

I can't fucking cut down below 180 for my afternoon weight.
Woke up yesterday weighing 175 lbs, and i was 183 by the end of the day and i only ate 1.6k cals that day
Worst part is i did an hour of cardio today and i've eaten like 2.5k cals so im going to be to 183 again tomorrow

Attached: 1518815377556.gif (500x500, 1.54M)

>185cm
>94kg
Literally all I have to do is lose 10kg and be peak aesthetics, if I lost 20 like you suppose i'd look like an Auschwitz survivor

live it

damn.

Post routine and stats pls

>175 cm
>63 kg
>still have obvious visible fat on my stomach

not gonna make it

are you fucking retarded?

Attached: 1525918403503.jpg (1000x944, 127K)

>65 kg
I'm 174cm at 63kg and I feel like a fucking skeleton. This is bullshit

Attached: 29940807511074.jpg (800x999, 92K)

Americans are dumb as shit, news at 11.