Vim is quicker to pick up.
Emacs is more extensible.
Redpill me on the vim vs. emacs question
Unironically, I would use ed on a 110 baud teletype.
emacs RSI
vim comfy
That's it.
>I wasn't able to figure out how to use emacs.
I'm so sorry user, we don't have a medical treatment for stupidity yet.
consider emacs if you want to take simple notes with org-mode, there's not much there that can compete with it, also markdown is for children.
there's no question your thread is shit try both to see why
This. I used to have a pretty minimal .vimrc and no plugins whatsoever.
I also often went to emacs but never stayed longer than a week because of the inane keybindings. And I was jelly of emacs dank packages like swiper, and the chad elisp is way cooler than the virgin vimscript.
As I tried adding plugins, it became a clusterfuck, and some plugins have emacs tier keybindings.
Then I gave evilmode a try, and I use emacs as a "better vim" instead of neovim or whatever.
>Blue collars wreck their back and knees everyday
>They just chill and crack a cold one after work
>nerds sit and type on a keyboard
>They cry about getting RSI and buy vertical mouses, kinetic keyboards and emacs pedals.
We're basically the male version of those tumblr chicks claiming they have PTSD over mean comments online.
>people overstrain their backs and knees every day, so overstraining your arms is impossible
You're basically a male version of a retard.
Why should I waste my time learning emacs when I already figured out Vim?