Of these twenty-three finalist North American cities, sixteen will host 2026 FIFA World Cup matches...

Of these twenty-three finalist North American cities, sixteen will host 2026 FIFA World Cup matches. Which seven cities are unworthy and thus should be eliminated?

Attached: 2026.jpg (795x795, 45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/football/blog/2017/aug/21/atlanta-united-mls-soccer-popularity-average-attendance
newrepublic.com/article/117918/photos-rio-prepares-world-cup-2014-clearing-slums
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Monterrey, Guadalajara, Mexico City, Edmonton, Montreal, and Toronto.

all the american countries, please don't bring that shit here

Calicornia can get the fuck out of here. They are on fire and they are already screwing over the poor.
Atlanta, Nashville, Kansas City too for being hicksville.
Boston for having spaghetti roads
DC for being a shithole all around.


comedy answer

This.

Mexico is the only one of these three countries that cares about soccer. Let them have it.

Its already being joint hosted by /cum/. Never followed Soccer but apparently yeah different cities hold different games but in a semi-central location (in this case, the continent of North America)

look at how cute the canadian capacities are :3c

Attached: 2026 stadiums.jpg (312x621, 113K)

So the big 3, not even Puebla? I also thought Leon and Queretaro were big enough nowadays

lmao Mexico's not much better outside of Mexico City. Then again Canada is first world.

If we cut out the dinkiest stadiums, we cut Toronto, Guadalajara, Edmonton, Monterrey, Montreal, Orlando (suck it Orlando), aaaand.....Cincinnati.

Canada and Mexico are locked in, the 7 to be cut will all come from America.