Shit like this isn’t surprising in the slightest user, just look at the genetic makeup of East Germans. Those countries surround each other, there’s hardly any “pure” 100% Scandis (minus Iceland maybe) or Germans or Poles or whatever anymore, if there ever was. Doesn’t mean the cultures in those regions changed though, and odds are a person in question would still be majority whatever of wherever they came from.
t. Slav/German mutt.
Okay... now this is epic
Romanians=Slavs. Why the fuck are they excluded. Not a Slavic language but those fuckers have the same mother somewhere in the line as you guys.
>Romanians=Slavs
They have a little Slavic ancestry but I don't think it's significant.
Of course, Slavic nationalists like to claim everyone is Slavic.
First of all, hate Slavic Nationalists. Hate Nationalists. Hate Nation States.
Second of all, please do your research. Don't want to paste links to articles behind scientific paywalls here, but the evidence is there. They have almost identical genetic markers to other Balkan Slavs. There are only trace elements of some Italian DNA, but they are almost homogeneous with Serbs, Bulgarians, etc.
>They have almost identical genetic markers to other Balkan Slavs.
Balkan "Slavs" are not ethnic Slavs though.
>mentioning genetics in relation to the Slavic ethno-LINGUISTIC group
This is even dumber than pan-Slavism
>non-contiguous countries
*щёлк*
Aгa, этoт идeт в мoeй кoмпиляции cмyщeниe.
i thought google translate got better, but it seems like i overestimated it
How would you say it?
It does some languages better than others. The English to Spanish translator is almost flawless.